id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_la5dn44e2jampizjwzt4ugzjwi	Adina L. Roskies	Brain‐Mind and Structure‐Function Relationships: A Methodological Response to Coltheart	2009	14	.pdf	application/pdf	6056	406	62	to address Coltheart's concerns, I explore how different brain structure-function relationships would constrain the ability of neuroimaging to provide insight about psychological questions. for Coltheart's challenge to be met, the psychological theories in question a theory expressed purely at the psychological level and a pattern of brain theories as stated by Umiltà are about cognition, and the reworded statements are about the brain. Coltheart's challenge can be revived by allowing bridge principles or auxiliary assumptions that enable one to infer function from location. psychological function to brain structure" (2006b, 323). is some 'systematic' mapping from psychological function to brain structure" (2006b, 323). This argument would clinch the ultra-cognitive neuropsychologist's in-principle argument against the possibility of brain imaging data informing psychology, but it is false. However, although neuroimaging cannot tell us everything about brain function, it would be shortsighted to claim that it therefore can't tell us anything. Coltheart's challenge makes plain the importance of functional-anatomical mapping to neuroimaging.	./cache/work_la5dn44e2jampizjwzt4ugzjwi.pdf	./txt/work_la5dn44e2jampizjwzt4ugzjwi.txt