id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_k2s6ej72urfgbhihf4r2soz6t4	Niels Linnemann	On metaphysically necessary laws from physics	2020	13	.pdf	application/pdf	6696	574	60	On the other hand, Wolff argues that a certain conservation law obtainable via Noether's second theorem is an instance of a metaphysically I show how Wolff's example for a putatively metaphysically necessary conservation law fails but argue that so-called topological currents hand, Wolff takes it that equations of motion can count as examples of physical laws I show how Wolff's example for a putatively metaphysically necessary conservation law in the sense of Fine fails but argue that so-called topological currents do count as metaphysically necessary conservation laws carrying physical content. count as metaphysically necessary conservation laws carrying physical content. Is Fine right to claim that some laws of nature are metaphysically necessary in this sense, Metaphysically necessary laws which hold in virtue of the dynamical nature of topological currents amounts to a metaphysically necessary conservation law which Topological currents as metaphysically necessary conservation laws	./cache/work_k2s6ej72urfgbhihf4r2soz6t4.pdf	./txt/work_k2s6ej72urfgbhihf4r2soz6t4.txt