id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_hxn7zpihwrdn3i27bznypk5rma	Felipe Romero	Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis	2019	15	.pdf	application/pdf	9327	1155	46	https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/philosophy-of-science-and-the-replicability-crisis(1d61bae7-cc7a-4d37-9cf5-b9f17561f1e9).html do work on several fronts, including conceptual analysis, history and philosophy of science, research ethics, and social Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science: We trust scientific findings because recent years, important published findings in the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences have failed to replicate Most likely, the replicability crisis is the result of the interaction of multiple methodological, statistical, and sociological factors (although authors often disagree about how much each factor contributes). successes (false positives), whereas the other 95% of the studies (true negatives) remain in the researchers' file Publication bias fuels a second contributing factor to the replicability crisis, namely, QRPs. Since statistical significance determines publication, scientists have incentives to deviate (sometimes even unconsciously) to achieve It is true that scientists have recently identified particular findings that do not replicate, but this is a tiny step in the direction of self-correction.	./cache/work_hxn7zpihwrdn3i27bznypk5rma.pdf	./txt/work_hxn7zpihwrdn3i27bznypk5rma.txt