id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_gx5iilqq55e7tp6wdpe6js5mga	Richard Bradley	Aggregating Causal Judgments	2014	25	.pdf	application/pdf	11008	810	57	construct a single aggregate judgment on the causal relations between the variables aggregation so as to preserve the causal information contained in probability judgments. we therefore pursue an alternative two-stage approach, aggregating �rst the qualitative causal judgments represented by the DAGs (Section 3) and then the quantitative judge X and Y to be causally independent with common cause Z, then that independence judgment should be re�ected in the aggregate probability function Pr. This Consider a group of n individuals, labelled 1, 2, ..., n, each of whom holds a particular judgment on the nature of the causal relevance relation between the variables rule, never generates an aggregate causal relevance relation violating acyclicity. n, it becomes possible to construct an admissible pro�le hc1;c2; :::;cni of individually acyclic causal relevance relations such that, for some set of distinct variables V1, V2, ..., Vm0, each of V1cV2, ..., Examples of causal judgment aggregation rules violating independence are	./cache/work_gx5iilqq55e7tp6wdpe6js5mga.pdf	./txt/work_gx5iilqq55e7tp6wdpe6js5mga.txt