id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_cxft2d6ia5bpff4sqwoz6tfxue	Erik Curiel	General Relativity Needs No Interpretation*	2009	27	.pdf	application/pdf	14035	660	50	as embodying physical theories in the first place, so those who argue that general relativity requires context of any of the consistent, cogent, concrete interpretations (in the sense of §2) we have of the theory: to transform a model of a physical system by the action of a spacetime diffeomorphism does nothing 5. therefore, we do not understand the way that general relativity's models represent the physical show that we lack understanding of the way general relativity represents physical systems. the ontology of the concrete content of general relativity as a physical theory is a categorial problem, just theory of quantum gravity.20 Those who hold that we must find an interpretation for general relativity questions of manifest physical content that general relativity cannot handle, or, at least, quantum field theory posed on classical limit of a quantum theory does not show that general relativity itself, as a complete physical	./cache/work_cxft2d6ia5bpff4sqwoz6tfxue.pdf	./txt/work_cxft2d6ia5bpff4sqwoz6tfxue.txt