id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_4ry4e6snozd7bo3xtbbu7tlfkq	Jonathan Fuller	Meta-Research Evidence for Evaluating Therapies	2018	14	.pdf	application/pdf	6031	398	54	I argue that meta-research evidence works by rationally revising our confidence I then make the case for meta-research evidence, considering several important objections to its use in evaluating therapies: the irrelevance objection, to evaluating the evidential support that E lends to H, or how strongly E supports H.1 A systematic review of publication bias is meta-evidence with respect to particular clinical trial evidence if it has some rational bearing on our But meta-research evidence functions by rationally revising our confidence in the FOE and thus in the premises of our we have been working (i.e., that they are evidence of bias in FOE), they warrant a lower confidence in the hypothesis; but in practice meta-research is First, the irrelevance objection argues that meta-research findings are not relevant to the therapeutic hypothesis; only FOE has rational bearing on this causal matter.	./cache/work_4ry4e6snozd7bo3xtbbu7tlfkq.pdf	./txt/work_4ry4e6snozd7bo3xtbbu7tlfkq.txt