dspace cover page Appletopia: Media Technology and the Religious Imagination of Steve Jobs by Brett T. Robinson The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Fischer, Michael M. J. “Appletopia: Media Technology and the Religious Imagination of Steve Jobs by Brett T. Robinson.” Technology and Culture 56, 1 (2015): 291–293 © 2015 Society for the History of Technology As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/TECH.2015.0000 Publisher Johns Hopkins University Press Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116110 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. https://libraries.mit.edu/forms/dspace-oa-articles.html http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/116110 Appletopia: Media Technology and the Religious Imagination of Steve Jobs by Brett T. Robinson (review) Michael M. J. Fischer Technology and Culture, Volume 56, Number 1, January 2015, pp. 291-293 (Review) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: For additional information about this article Access provided by MIT Libraries (4 Jun 2018 13:28 GMT) https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.0000 https://muse.jhu.edu/article/572139 https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2015.0000 https://muse.jhu.edu/article/572139 B O O K R E V I E W S 291 period visioneering’s brand of futurism also reached broad, new audiences through Omni magazine. While visioneers often felt the credibility of their enterprises was threatened by association with such disreputable supporters as LSD guru Timothy Leary and, later, the cryonics movement, the case of nanotech- nology offers an interesting twist. McCray argues that Drexler and the Foresight Institute (which Drexler co-founded) successfully leveraged the credibility of then-recent advances in the understanding of biomolecular processes to help generate not only enthusiasm but generous funding for nano-scale research. When this research began to focus on instruments such as the scanning tunneling microscope and materials such as carbon nanotubes, Drexler’s computer simulations of molecule-sized machines, and his speculation about the danger of them turning their environment into a “gray goo,” came to be regarded as endangering immediately pro- ductive research. The Visioneers does not purport to be a comprehensive history. Notably, the wonderful “leaping robot” on the book’s cover belies a dearth of content on robotics, cybernetics, and artificial intelligence. Nevertheless, the book is a worthy contribution to a growing historiography of the sprawling intellectual and cultural spaces that have existed around the edges of mainstream science and technology. It may be profitably read alongside Fred Turner’s From Counterculture to Cyberculture (2006), David Kaiser’s How the Hippies Saved Physics (2011), Michael Gordin’s The Pseudoscience Wars (2012), Andrew Pickering’s The Cybernetic Brain (2010), and Helge Kragh’s Higher Speculations (2011). WILLIAM THOMAS William Thomas is a senior historian at History Associates, Inc., in Rockville, Maryland. His book, Rational Action: The Sciences of Policy in Britain and America, 1940–1960, is available this spring from the MIT Press. Appletopia: Media Technology and the Religious Imagination of Steve Jobs. By Brett T. Robinson. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2013. Pp. xii+147. $24.95. This reading of Apple ads—for the Macintosh (iMac), iPod, iPhone, and iPad—by a marketing professor suggests “Jobs and Apple provide an alle- gory for reading religion in the information age” (p. 105). With white dust jacket, black lettering, and silhouette with dark red highlighting of “topia” and “Steve Jobs,” the slim book mimics an Apple product. Brett Robinson traces his method to the Birmingham School of Cultural Studies (p. 108) but it seems more akin to the University of Chicago’s symbolic interac- tionist marketing studies in the 1950s and to the symbolic anthropology of 16_bkrevs 261–306.qxp_13_49.3bkrevs 779– 1/27/15 11:00 AM Page 291 T E C H N O L O G Y A N D C U L T U R E JANUARY 2015 VOL. 56 292 the 1960s and 1970s (see Melissa Cefkin, ed., Ethnography and the Cor- porate Encounter, 2009). Robinson argues that Apple, with its forbidden fruit icon, like other culturally key technologies (cathedral, arcade, railroad-telegraph, Golden Gate Bridge, automobile, translucent Le Grande Arche, Fifth Avenue Ap- ple Store) is a vehicle of transcendence. Like his hero Edwin Land, Jobs wants to stand in the intersection of engineering and the humanities, dis- solving the antagonisms between machines and human beings. For this, advertising is not just a tool of persuasion, but a highly emotive “aesthetic encounter” (p. 16). “The representations and practices of technology are composed of a diffuse set of rituals and rhetoric”; “images and slogans of technological advertising provide a computer catechism” (p. 5). Citing Umberto Eco’s satire of the Protestant PC (free interpretation, but difficult choices, not all can achieve salvation) versus the Catholic Macintosh (cheerful, friendly, conciliatory, catechistic in telling the faithful how to proceed step-by-step, and promising salvation to all), Robinson sees Apple ads operating like medieval morality plays. The PC is the fall into tedious work and depersonalization; the Mac is liberation and creativity, facilitat- ing “self-divinization by procuring the powers of omniscience and omni- presence granted by a global communication network” (p. 17). Robinson cites Ralph Waldo Emerson as seeing new technologies “reducing the earth to a brain . . . by telegraph and steam the Earth is anthropologized” (p. 7), Pierre Teilhard de Chardin updating this as a noosphere or supercon- sciousness through electronic communication, and Timothy Leary calling the personal computer the LSD of the 1990s (“It makes perfect sense to me that if you activate your brain with psychedelic drugs, the only way you can describe it is electronically”) (p. 55). The delicious review of iMac ads includes: “Narcissus” (the impish iMac monitor following a man walking past; man stops to look; as if in a mirror he sees in the screen extensions of his own creativity, productivity, sociability, and memory) (p. 33); and the sixty-six 30-second ad series “Get a Mac” (Mac dressed casually, PC in business suit, vignettes of “conflict between the human spirit of creativity and the dreary environment of labor and soulless efficiency”) (p. 40). The iPod ads shift from sharp product photos to silhouette dancers on neon backgrounds, white wires hanging from their heads, giving new meaning to the term “wirehead” (1960s hip- pies who liked electronics). In “Cubicle,” single albums and the materiality of analog media are sucked into the iPod nano as universal container; in “Wild Postings” it is the twenty-six iPod poster ads that are in color as a plugged-in man blocks out street sounds and encounters a man with child on his shoulders, the child’s legs in affectionate embrace around the man’s ears, “a visual metaphor for the companionship of the iPod” (p. 52). The iPhone ads, “Touching Is Believing,” evoke Michelangelo, doubting Thom- as, the idiom “seeing is believing,” and Buddhism-Gnosticism (suffering body, digital liberation). 16_bkrevs 261–306.qxp_13_49.3bkrevs 779– 1/27/15 11:00 AM Page 292 B O O K R E V I E W S 293 Robinson’s rare criticism is formulaic: “what Apple offers us in the iPhone ads is a false freedom, one that offers amusement and efficiency as counterfeit forms of human leisure” (p. 73). More trenchant: the Waldorf School, where many of the children of Apple, Google, Yahoo, and H-P exec- utives go, eschews computers, in favor of “chalkboards, wood desks, encyclo- pedias and No. 2 pencils,” “learning math by knitting and baking” (p. 199). In the ad “Listen to the Music,” dancers paint the air with neon light from the iPod, like glow sticks at a rave, or seeing trails when on acid; Cut Chemist plays trance-inducing acid house. Robinson delights in identify- ing the music in the ads (naming is owning, also access to purchasing)— hip-hop, reggae, and tribal percussion (The Black Eyed Peas) and rock and symphony (Chris Martin); and 1960s legacies in Jobs’s belief in enlight- ened individuals—therapist and LSD researcher Richard Alpert (turned Ram Das), yogi Paramahansa Yogananda, Bill Gates’s psychedelic history, Tim Berners-Lee’s Unitarian Universalism, and Roberto Parada’s illustra- tion “The Night Steve Jobs Met Andy Warhol.” MICHAEL M. J. FISCHER Michael M. J. Fischer is professor of anthropology and science and technology studies at the Massachussetts Institute of Technology. Arming Mother Nature: The Birth of Catastrophic Environmentalism. By Joseph Darwin Hamblin. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 298. $29.95. This fascinating book explores the ingenious, cruel, ludicrous, and heinous ways that American scientists, military planners, and medical profession- als attempted to recruit nature into their plans for waging total war against the Soviet Union and other ideological enemies. Joseph Hamblin traces this broad-based effort: among other things, he argues that military inves- tigations into environmental interdependencies and weaponry were part of the emerging ecological and environmental consciousness of the post– World War II era. Narratives about total war typically focus on nuclear weapons and doc- trines of mutual assured destruction, in which the targeting of entire cities decisively obliterates any remaining division between civilian and combat- ant. But once the United States lost the monopoly on nuclear weapons in 1949, and as the increasing destructive power of those weapons made nuclear war unthinkable, planners shifted their focus to other ways of wag- ing total war by turning the environment into a weapon of mass destruc- tion. The Pentagon was thus cooking up various dastardly plans to harness nature: triggering massive earthquakes and tsunamis with strategically placed nuclear explosions, unleashing diseases, defoliating forests, changing weather patterns. Even if these transformations affected both the United States and the Soviet Union, catastrophe planners assumed that the United 16_bkrevs 261–306.qxp_13_49.3bkrevs 779– 1/27/15 11:00 AM Page 293