Science Magazine 8 4 2 21 FEBRUARY 2020 • VOL 367 ISSUE 6480 sciencemag.org S C I E N C E P H O T O : M A R C E L O H E R N A N D E Z / G E T T Y I M A G E S FEATURES The fight against harassment in Latin American science gains strength #METOO MOVES SOUTH F or decades, from his base at the University of Los Andes (Unian- des) in Bogotá, Colombia, biologist Adolfo Amézquita Torres made his name studying the diverse, jewel- like poisonous frogs of the Andes and the Amazon. But on campus, he compiled a darker record, former and current students have alleged in dozens of complaints. They say he mis- treated women, including by favoring and emotionally abusing female students he was dating and retaliating against those who rejected his advances or complained about his behavior. Earlier this month, university officials concluded he was guilty of sexual harassment and misconduct and fired him in a watershed moment for the university— and for a growing effort to fight sexual mis- conduct on campuses across Latin America. Amézquita Torres, who until recently was head of Uniandes’s biology department, tells Science he did have consensual relationships with students, but claims that such dating was long considered acceptable and that he didn’t knowingly violate any university rules. He denies harassing, favoring, or retaliating against anyone, and says he will challenge the 6 February verdict, claiming the process was flawed and unfair. He vows to “use all available legal tools to recover as much as I can of my dignity.” The firing marked a dramatic turn in a twisting, nearly 15-month-long controversy, which deeply divided one of Latin America’s most prestigious private universities and was closely watched by Colombia’s media and women’s rights groups. Many applauded the university’s decision. “This is going to send a huge message … I think instructors are go- ing to be much more careful,” says ecologist Ximena Bernal, a native of Colombia who earned her undergraduate degree at Unian- des and now works at Purdue University. But she and others complain that the Uni- andes investigation was marred by bureau- cratic bungling and a lack of transparency. They say those missteps, which included re- versing an earlier decision to fire Amézquita Torres, highlight how universities across Latin America are struggling to protect women within cultures that have long toler- ated, and even celebrated, male privilege and a set of attitudes known as machismo. “There is a lot of variation from univer- sity to university, but some places exhibit rampant and almost institutionalized ma- By Lindzi Wessel and Rodrigo Pérez Ortega Published by AAAS o n A p ril 5 , 2 0 2 1 h ttp ://scie n ce .scie n ce m a g .o rg / D o w n lo a d e d fro m http://science.sciencemag.org/ 21 FEBRUARY 2020 • VOL 367 ISSUE 6480 8 4 3S C I E N C E sciencemag.org chismo,” says Juan Manuel Guayasamin Ernest, a herpetologist at San Francisco Uni- versity of Quito in Ecuador. And although women have gained ground in employment and status at Latin American universities in recent years, most research institutions are still “dominated by men surrounded by more men,” he says. Such masculine demography has helped promote a sometimes toxic atmosphere for women in academia—including faculty and students in the sciences—according to doz- ens of researchers from across Latin America who spoke with Science. Machismo can ac- tively deter women from pursuing a career in scientific research, Bernal says. “We have lost a lot of scientists because of this.” Many universities in the region lack for- mal policies for reporting, investigating, or punishing abuse or sexual misconduct, or don’t rigorously enforce the policies they do have. And campus administrators have long winked at potentially problematic behaviors, such as male faculty members dating their fe- male students. Women who speak out about such issues can face retaliation and public vilification. “It’s very common to hear … ‘Oh yeah, those feminazis, they’re just crazy people,’” says Jennifer Stynoski, a herpeto- logist from the United States who works at the University of Costa Rica, San José. Now, the tide might be turning. At Unian- des and elsewhere, administrators are prom- ising to adopt stronger policies and enforce them. In some countries, leg- islators and agencies are mov- ing to enact new, nationwide standards for reporting sexual harassment at campuses and research institutes. In 2019, more than 250 researchers signed a letter, published in Science, urging “scientists and institutions across Latin Amer- ica to be aware of the damage that machismo, and its denial, inflicts on women and the en- terprise of science as a whole,” and to take stronger action to deter misbehavior. And an emerging constel- lation of advocacy groups has been ratch- eting up the pressure for reform through social media campaigns, legal challenges, and other tactics—including marches and even the takeover of university buildings. “In Latin American countries in the last 5 years or so, we’ve had this movement against gender-based violence and harass- ment,” says Mario Pecheny, a political science researcher at the University of Buenos Aires. “It’s raised a huge mobilization of women.” NATIONS IN LATIN AMERICA have some of the world’s highest reported rates of violence against women, according to a 2017 United Nations report. University campuses are no exception. The National University of Colom- bia, Bogotá, surveyed 1602 of its female stu- dents and found that more than half reported experiencing some kind of sexual violence while on campus or during university-related activities. (The survey was first reported by Vice Colombia.) Verbal harassment and dis- crimination are at least as prevalent. But when victims go to university officials to report harassment or an assault, they often meet with indifference or confusion. In part, that’s because many administra- tors have no guidebook. In 2019, journal- ists Ketzalli Rosas, Jordy Meléndez Yúdico, and a team of 35 reporters at Distintas Lati- tudes, a digital news platform that covers Latin America, surveyed 100 universities in 16 Latin American nations and found that 60% lacked policies for handling sexual ha- rassment complaints. Janneke Noorlag, a Dutch immigrant to Chile, got a firsthand look at the conse- quences of such gaps when she was a master’s student studying environmental sustain- ability at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile (PUC), Santiago. In 2015, Noorlag’s husband and a faculty member, acting on her behalf, filed a sexual assault complaint against one of Noorlag’s classmates and a second man. PUC declined to investigate be- cause it “lacked the competence and techni- cal means to investigate properly,” according to a letter it sent to Noorlag’s husband. The university ac- knowledges that, at the time, it had no “specific protocols on sexual violence.” Instead, university officials told Noorlag to pursue the matter with local law enforce- ment. (She did; they declined to pursue charges.) Noorlag says she ultimately dropped out of PUC because of the university’s lapses, including allowing one of her alleged at- tackers to continue to attend classes and serve as a teaching assistant. (A university spokesperson says it did ulti- mately suspend the alleged attacker from teaching, adding that PUC now has a policy against allowing complainants and alleged perpetrators to attend the same classes.) Now, Noorlag says, “I really have no trust in university authorities.” Even a formal policy “doesn’t guarantee anything,” says Meléndez Yúdico, who is di- rector of Distintas Latitudes. Some policies can be difficult to implement because they lack important details, he says, such as a clear deadline for filing complaints, defini- tions of ambiguous terms, and procedures for protecting an accuser’s identity. And the existence of a policy “doesn’t mean the will is there to use it,” Meléndez Yúdico says. Uni- versities have let cases drag on indefinitely, without communicating a timeline for reso- lution, says Isadora Fragoso, an undergradu- ate student at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, and a member of the feminist student move- ment Rosas Rojas (Red Roses). “Although women go to the appropriate authorities to make complaints … they simply remain ar- chived,” she says. “They never proceed.” When universities do take action against alleged harassers, the punishment can seem mild. In 2017, Austral University of Chile scrambled to develop a sexual mis- conduct policy for professors after multiple allegations emerged against a prominent National movements, like the one behind this demonstration in Santiago, Chile, have helped drive changes on campuses. N E W S “Some places exhibit rampant and almost institutionalized machismo.” Juan Manuel Guayasamin Ernest, San Francisco University of Quito Published by AAAS o n A p ril 5 , 2 0 2 1 h ttp ://scie n ce .scie n ce m a g .o rg / D o w n lo a d e d fro m http://science.sciencemag.org/ N E W S | F E AT U R E S 8 4 4 21 FEBRUARY 2020 • VOL 367 ISSUE 6480 sciencemag.org S C I E N C E faculty member, biochemist Alejandro Yáñez Cárcamo. Complainants alleged he had ha- rassed a female administrator working under him, assaulted a female student, and made inappropriate comments toward women. (Yáñez Cárcamo did not respond to requests for comment.) In April 2018, after an inves- tigation, the university suspended him from teaching for 2 years, but allowed him to con- tinue his research at a field station. Protests by those who felt the school’s actions weren’t strong enough erupted throughout Chile. At Austral, faculty and stu- dents took over a building and went on strike. The university then moved to fire Yáñez Cárcamo, but a court reinstated him, ruling he could not be punished twice for the same misbehavior. In September 2018, the case received renewed attention when Yáñez Cárcamo attended a cam- pus event—defying a request from the university’s president to stay away— and was confronted by ecologist Olga Barbosa, then a professor at the univer- sity, who respectfully asked him to leave. A photograph of the confrontation went viral, and the incident made Barbosa, now the southern regional secretary for Chile’s Ministry of Science, Technol- ogy, Knowledge and Innovation, an icon for antiharassment activists. (Yáñez Cárcamo remains on the faculty and was allowed back on campus last year.) AT UNIANDES, the contentious case of Amézquita Torres put the challenges facing Latin American universities in the #MeToo era on very public dis- play. Administrators at the university, which enrolls nearly 25,000 under- graduate and graduate students and is considered one of Latin America’s top 10 training institutions, first began to examine the allegations against the herpetologist in November 2018, according to documents obtained by Science. That was just 2 years after Uniandes became one of the first universities in Colombia to adopt rules on reporting and investigating allega- tions of abusive behavior and sexual mis- conduct. By then, Amézquita Torres, who arrived at Uniandes as an undergraduate in 1985, had established an active interna- tional research program and become head of the biology department. As word of the complaints against Amézquita Torres spread, some stu- dents and faculty rallied to his defense, praising him as a skilled mentor and re- searcher and arguing he was being at- tacked for behavior—particularly dating students—long considered acceptable. Oth- ers took a decidedly different view. Female and male complainants, as well as more than 20 people familiar with the case in- terviewed by Science, paint Amézquita Torres as a charismatic but mercurial person- ality who fostered divisiveness. “You go from being on his good side to being on his bad side, and then you kind of have this verbal abuse wrath,” says one man, a former Uni- andes student who worked with Amézquita Torres and asked not to be named for fear of retaliation. “He’ll start not reading your man- uscripts, he’ll start neglecting you.” Mónica Pinzón, a former student of Amézquita Torres who is now a filmmaker, wrote to the university last year to describe how he targeted her for retribution. In 2003, he made sexually charged remarks and subjected her to “unmeasured rage” after she camped in an unapproved site during a field trip, she wrote. After that, “His treatment was horrible. … He wouldn’t read my thesis. … He made the rest of my time in the lab very bitter,” she says. Pinzón was also distressed by what she describes as controlling and manipulative behav- ior by Amézquita Torres toward his then- girlfriend, who was a student. The experi- ence led Pinzón to leave academia. “The only thing I regret,” she says, “is not speak- ing up when these things were happening.” In interviews with Science and in lengthy statements sent to the university, Amézquita Torres flatly denied many of the specific allegations against him, including that he retaliated against students. “I don’t do that … I am not aggressive to the stu- dents,” he told Science prior to the univer- sity’s announcement that it was firing him. Many of the accusations, he said, were the result of a “witch hunt” led by one person who had a conflict with him over “politics and money.” “Having relationships with the students,” he said, “makes you vulner- able to people with evil intentions.” Such defenses ultimately did not sway university officials, but the process that produced their verdict was chaotic. In early 2019, after an initial investigation, the uni- versity fired Amézquita Torres for failing to disclose his sexual relationships with stu- dents, ruling that such ties constituted con- flicts of interest. But he won reinstatement after arguing the university hadn’t followed proper procedures. The university then removed him as head of the biol- ogy department and barred him from teaching, but allowed him to continue his research, while a special faculty panel conducted a new investigation. In March 2019, fearing that the uni- versity was burying the case, the com- plainants and their allies used public demonstrations and other tactics to press their demands for more infor- mation and action. On social media, users widely shared a video of a stu- dent reading aloud from a statement written by a woman who claimed that Amézquita Torres had harassed her. Nearly 300 alumni of the biology department signed a letter to univer- sity officials, urging them to clarify where the investigation stood. Allies of Amézquita Torres responded by con- demning the pressure campaign, and the researcher himself went to court in a bid to silence media outlets cover- ing the case and students sharing the video on social media. He failed. Amid the escalating public battle, Uniandes got a new president: econo- mist Alejandro Gaviria Uribe, a former min- ister of health in Colombia. When he arrived in July 2019, Gaviria Uribe recalls promising to bring the case to “a fair and quick” resolu- tion. “Unfortunately, the process [took] lon- ger than I expected,” he told Science earlier this month. Now, students and faculty on all sides are digesting the verdict. “Before, [such be- havior] was normalized,” says a member of the university’s faculty who asked not to be named for fear of retaliation. “But now, with the #MeToo movement and the various other movements of female students, it has stopped being normal. The spark has ignited so that this case would finally explode.” “This isn’t just about him. … It’s an ac- tion against bad behavior in science,” adds one of the complainants, who asked to remain anonymous because of fears of SC R E E N S H O T : T W IT T E R In an image that went viral, ecologist Olga Barbosa confronts alleged harasser Alejandro Yáñez Cárcamo on a Chilean campus. Published by AAAS o n A p ril 5 , 2 0 2 1 h ttp ://scie n ce .scie n ce m a g .o rg / D o w n lo a d e d fro m http://science.sciencemag.org/ 21 FEBRUARY 2020 • VOL 367 ISSUE 6480 8 4 5S C I E N C E sciencemag.org retaliation. “It took us literally years, but something finally happened.” Gaviria Uribe has vowed to fix the bu- reaucratic problems exposed by the case. Although the sexual misconduct policy Uni- andes adopted in 2016 “has no precedents in Colombia and only a few in Latin America … we still have much to learn,” he says. The university plans to offer legal resources to complainants, he says, and add courses on gender issues. Officials will also need to define what constitutes appropriate rela- tionships between students and professors, Gaviria Uribe notes. Many hope the campus can now start to heal. Uniandes officials will be moving stu- dents who had been studying with Amézquita Torres to new supervisors. But biologist Catalina Palacios, a Uniandes doctoral stu- dent who aided some of the complainants, says, “We expect rough days ahead in terms of trying to rebuild the community here.” THE UNIANDES CASE underscores how far universities in Latin America have yet to go in addressing sexual harassment issues. One needed step, Bernal says, is for universi- ties to step up training and awareness. She recalls that it wasn’t until she left Colombia for the United States in 2001 that she realized behaviors long tolerated at Latin American universities weren’t OK. Recently, she spoke to a group of female Ecuadorian students who characterized their university as free of harassment—until Bernal started to ask specific questions about whether their pro- fessors dated their students and made sexist remarks. “They were like, ‘Oh yeah, well, guys are guys,’” she says. “When you think this is the norm, you don’t realize there’s a problem.” In 2018, such experiences led Bernal to circulate the letter eventually published in Science (22 February 2019, p. 825) that called for obliterating that norm. “Latin American women scientists … are immersed in a society where culturally ingrained mas- culine pride (‘machismo’) is normalized and deeply intertwined with the scientific endeavor,” Bernal and her cosigners wrote. “Machismo promotes sexist attitudes that often pass unnoticed,” they added. They urged scientists in the region to become “proactive about recognizing, confronting, and penalizing inappropriate behaviors.” Bernal and others see signs of progress, including a recent uptick in the number of universities adopting policies on sexual misconduct. UNAM, which adopted its pol- icy in 2016, says it has now fielded more than 1200 complaints and ousted about 100 alleged perpetrators—albeit sometimes after student protests that included building takeovers. Mexican academics campaign- ing against harassment have even adopted a popular hashtag: #MeTooAcademicos (#MeTooAcademics). And across Latin Amer- ica, students have taken to social media un- der the hashtag #MePasóEnLaU (It happened to me in the university). The campus-based movements echo broader campaigns against gender violence. Brazil has #NãoéNão (No is No), Argentina #NiUnaMenos (Not One Less), and Chile Educación No Sexista (Nonsexist Educa- tion). In many countries, activists have rep- licated a Chilean mass protest anthem and performance, called “Un Violador En Tu Camino” (“A Rapist In Your Path”), which includes women donning blindfolds and chanting against impunity for aggressors. Science groups and governments are also moving to address sexual misconduct in re- search. In recent years, major conferences held in the region—including those spon- sored by the Latin American Conference of Herpetology and the Colombian National Conference of Zoology—have added sym- posiums on the issue. In August 2019, the Chilean Senate approved a bill requiring all government-sponsored institutions to de- velop detailed sexual harassment policies; the bill now awaits action in its House of Representatives. And the country’s science ministry recently announced a gender equal- ity policy. Argentina’s National Scientific and Technical Research Council is working to es- tablish similar policies at its research centers. In many Latin American nations, inac- tion remains the norm. Yet Barbosa is en- couraged by what she is seeing. The rising challenge to machismo, she says, has helped her realize that she’s “not crazy” for envi- sioning a better future for female research- ers in Latin America. Those who commit harassment and abuse are beginning to face consequences, she says, which is what is needed “to make sure that this will not hap- pen to anyone else.” j Lindzi Wessel is a journalist in Santiago, Chile. Rodrigo Pérez Ortega is Science’s news intern. PH O T O : J A V IE R T O R R E S / A F P / G E T T Y I M A G E S In Santiago, Chile, women demonstrate against impunity for aggressors in a public performance piece that has since been replicated in many other nations. Published by AAAS o n A p ril 5 , 2 0 2 1 h ttp ://scie n ce .scie n ce m a g .o rg / D o w n lo a d e d fro m http://science.sciencemag.org/ #MeToo moves south Lindzi Wessel and Rodrigo Pérez Ortega DOI: 10.1126/science.367.6480.842 (6480), 842-845.367Science ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6480/842 PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions Terms of ServiceUse of this article is subject to the is a registered trademark of AAAS.ScienceScience, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement ofScience Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of o n A p ril 5 , 2 0 2 1 h ttp ://scie n ce .scie n ce m a g .o rg / D o w n lo a d e d fro m http://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6480/842 http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions http://www.sciencemag.org/about/terms-service http://science.sciencemag.org/