id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_2au25gcbsjbyjhlmtdsvefm7ni	Elizabeth A. Sharrow	Sex segregation as policy problem: a gendered policy paradox	2019	23	.pdf	application/pdf	12848	1122	52	Separate but ostensibly equal segregated athletic teams for men and boys versus women Policy design defines sex as a binary category for the purposes of competitive athletics, mobilizing this categorical definition to implement the practice of of discrimination "on the basis of sex." Activists drew on long traditions of feminist critique (Cott 1987), framing educational institutions as a breeding ground for sexist exclusions of women from public life (Evans 2010). domains established by policy design largely serve to retain "men's" sports for "male" participants and, because Title IX does not require sex equality in spending practices, they and intercollegiate athletics governed by Title IX borrow from signals transmitted by international sports governing bodies (e.g., the International Olympic Committee) in maintaining policy design, even without "testing" participant sex.31 Instead, NCAA and state high	./cache/work_2au25gcbsjbyjhlmtdsvefm7ni.pdf	./txt/work_2au25gcbsjbyjhlmtdsvefm7ni.txt