id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-346327-dgpkiqgu	Ferriss, J. Stuart	Systematic Review of Intraoperative Assessment Tools in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery	2020-10-18		.txt	text/plain	2013	132	46	Objective : To collect, summarize, and evaluate the currently available intraoperative rating tools used in abdominal minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS). Conclusions Procedure specific intraoperative assessment tools for MIGS cases are more 37 thoroughly evaluated compared to global tools; however, poor-quality studies and borderline 38 reliability limit their use. Conclusions Procedure specific intraoperative assessment tools for MIGS cases are more 37 thoroughly evaluated compared to global tools; however, poor-quality studies and borderline 38 reliability limit their use. Well designed, controlled studies evaluating the effectiveness of 39 intraoperative assessment tools in MIGS are needed. Articles describing the use of an evaluation tool focused on a minimally invasive 81 abdominal gynecologic procedure in the intraoperative or perioperative setting were included. Four of the studies 106 used a global assessment tool, and the remaining 6 used a tool evaluated during a specific 107 minimally invasive procedure: salpingectomy (2), supra-cervical hysterectomy, total 108 laparoscopic hysterectomy (2), and robotic hysterectomy.	./cache/cord-346327-dgpkiqgu.txt	./txt/cord-346327-dgpkiqgu.txt