id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-274597-a67u1elx	Röseler, Lukas	Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts	2020-10-16		.txt	text/plain	7390	448	59	Apart from anchors and the target question, the only other difference between Mussweiler and Englich's Studies 1 and 2 was the prime detection task in Study 2, in which participants tried to recognize the subliminally presented anchor. To facilitate a power analysis, we pooled the effect sizes of the original Studies 1 and 2 (which differed only with respect to the target question) and found a mean effect of d = 0.69 (N = 76, 95% CI = [0.23, 1.16] , N min95% = 94) of subliminal anchoring. We defined the replication attempt as successful if both of the following criteria were met: (a) The effect of the subliminal anchors was significantly larger than 0, and (b) the effect was not significantly smaller than the original effect [for the sake of precision, we pooled Mussweiler & Englich's, 2005 effect sizes from Studies 1 and 2, d = 0.69].	./cache/cord-274597-a67u1elx.txt	./txt/cord-274597-a67u1elx.txt