id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-304232-c0cpx2q3	Opriessnig, Tanja	Update on possible animal sources for COVID‐19 in humans	2020-06-17		.txt	text/plain	988	75	54	7 In support of these early results, an ongoing study conducted at the Friedrich Loeffler Institute in Germany further confirmed that pigs and chickens are not susceptible to intranasal infection with SARS-CoV-2 (https://prome dmail.org/prome d-post/?id=7196506). 7 Natural infection, as evidenced by the presence of antibodies, SARS-CoV-2 RNA or both, has been identified in selected dogs in close contact with COVID-19 patients (Table 3) . A recent French study, which investigated nine cats and 12 dogs in close contact with a cluster of COVID-19 patients, was unable to detect evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in any of the animals. Moreover, animal-to-human SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as natural animal-to-animal transmission has yet to be confirmed and none of the species considered to be susceptible to the virus at this point are presently used for xenotransplantation. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2	./cache/cord-304232-c0cpx2q3.txt	./txt/cord-304232-c0cpx2q3.txt