key: cord-017767-zj1h5ixf
authors: Shieh, Wun-Ju; Zaki, Sherif R.
title: Advanced Pathology Techniques for Detecting Emerging Infectious Disease Pathogens
date: 2012-04-05
journal: Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3970-7_45
sha: 
doc_id: 17767
cord_uid: zj1h5ixf

Detection and surveillance for emerging and reemerging pathogens need a multidisciplinary approach. The intertwining complexity of these pathogens with their diverse tissue tropisms, direct effects on host cells, multiphasic immunological responses, and additional influence of superimposed secondary agents is beyond the expertise of a single discipline in modern medicine. A combined evaluation of patient’s history, clinical manifestations, and physical examination may suggest a list of differential diagnosis, but it is often insufficient to determine the specific infectious etiology. Laboratory methods are essential to identify an etiologic agent from testing clinical samples, such as blood, serum, nasopharyngeal swab, etc. These methods, including traditional microbiological techniques, conventional immunological assays, and modern molecular methods, remain the mainstay in today’s practice of clinical microbiology and infectious disease medicine. Nevertheless, there are technical and logistic issues associated with these methods, and the test results often lack a clinicopathologic correlation that can confound the interpretation of their clinical significance. For example, microbiological culture may fail to grow a causative organism, while the organism isolated by the laboratory in vitro may arise from contamination and does not represent the actual infective agent in vivo.

Detection and surveillance for emerging and reemerging pathogens need a multidisciplinary approach. The intertwining complexity of these pathogens with their diverse tissue tropisms, direct effects on host cells, multiphasic immunological responses, and additional in fl uence of superimposed secondary agents is beyond the expertise of a single discipline in modern medicine. A combined evaluation of patient's history, clinical manifestations, and physical examination may suggest a list of differential diagnosis, but it is often insuf fi cient to determine the speci fi c infectious etiology. Laboratory methods are essential to identify an etiologic agent from testing clinical samples, such as blood, serum, nasopharyngeal swab, etc. These methods, including traditional microbiological techniques, conventional immunological assays, and modern molecular methods, remain the mainstay in today's practice of clinical microbiology and infectious disease medicine. Nevertheless, there are technical and logistic issues associated with these methods, and the test results often lack a clinicopathologic correlation that can confound the interpretation of their clinical signi fi cance. For example, microbiological culture may fail to grow a causative organism, while the organism isolated by the laboratory in vitro may arise from contamination and does not represent the actual infective agent in vivo.

Pathology plays a key role as a bridging subspecialty in such multidisciplinary approach. Pathologic examination, if available, can establish a more speci fi c diagnosis correlated with clinical manifestations. Although general practice of pathology is largely oriented toward diagnosis of neoplastic diseases, pathologists have been increasingly called upon to make diagnoses from tissue samples collected by cytology, biopsy, and autopsy procedures in response to the challenge of emerging infections [1] [2] [3] [4] . Using these tissue samples as the source for laboratory workup, pathologists have made various contributions to our understanding of emerging infectious diseases in diagnostics, pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical aspects of these diseases (Table 45 .1 ). In addition, results from pathologic studies can help design better strategies for control and prevention of these emerging infectious diseases, especially when they occur as an outbreak [ 5, 6 ] . Furthermore, pathologic studies also play an essential role in identifying the effects of secondary pathogens that commonly complicate the primary disease syndrome [ 7, 8 ] .

Recent advances in molecular biology have revolutionized the practice of medicine, especially in the arena of diagnostic pathology and laboratory medicine [9] [10] [11] . The practice of pathology has evolved from using morphologic pattern recognition as the main tool to a sophisticated medical subspecialty by applying a wide array of advanced immunologic and molecular techniques on top of the traditional methods. The so-called "traditional methods" include routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain, histochemical (special) stain, and electron microscopy (EM). The more commonly used advanced techniques include immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR), and tissue microarrays. Other advanced techniques that are less standardized as diagnostic utilities include confocal microscopy, proteomics, laser capture microdissection (LCM), and in situ PCR. The results from these techniques provide different information regarding the infectious agents in the organ systems they involve (Table 45. 2 ). Each technique has its respective advantages and limitations, and there is no single technique that can stand alone as the only method for etiologic diagnosis. The advanced techniques complement the traditional methods to con fi rm the diagnosis; therefore, it is always necessary to apply these techniques as an integrated laboratory utility to take full advantage of the pathology approach.

A good example to illustrate such approach is the identi fi cation of a novel coronavirus during the global epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] . By using traditional culture ( Fig. 45 .1a ) and EM examinations ( Fig. 45 .1b ) on clinical samples and tissue specimens, the morphologic evidence of coronavirus leads to subsequent anatomic localization of this novel virus in lung tissues by using a combination of IHC ( Fig. 45 .1c ), ISH ( Fig. 45.1d ) , and PCR. Ultimately, correlations of these data with serological and clinical fi ndings con fi rmed the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) as the etiologic pathogen of the outbreak. This is a prime example of the contributions made by infectious disease pathology as part of a multidisciplinary approach to investigate emerging infections and disease outbreaks. 

Any pathology laboratory dealing with clinical diagnosis routinely performs H&E stain. It demonstrates the histologic and cytologic features in a tissue section and allows the pathologists to examine the microscopic changes related to infectious processes. This is the most unequivocal method to illustrate the evidence of a microbial infection and its consequence in the tissue. For example, the presence of abundant neutrophils in pulmonary alveoli is indicative of pneumonia ( Fig. 45 .2a ), while neutrophils in meninges support the diagnosis of meningitis. However, these histopathologic fi ndings shown by H&E stain are not speci fi c because they can be caused by a variety of organisms; their importance is to pave the fi rst step leading to further laboratory assays for detecting the causative agent. 

Many histochemical stains have been developed to highlight a variety of microbial organisms. Some of the common ones are tissue Gram stain (for bacteria), Grocott's methenamine silver stain (for fungi), acid-fast stain (for mycobacteria), periodic acid-Schiff stain (for organisms with high content of carbohydrate macromolecules), Warthin-Starry silver stain or Steiner's silver stain (for spirochetes and other bacteria). Interpretation of these special stains performed on tissue sections is usually more dif fi cult than those performed on cultures because the coexistence of host tissue responses and accompanied histopathologic changes in the sections can confound the interpretation. It needs more expertise and effort to examine these special stains and usually requires a trained pathologist to carry out such examination. For example, Streptococcus pneumoniae can appear as gram-negative cocci in tissue sections because the host in fl ammatory responses, antibiotic treatment, or autolysin produced by the bacteria per se can damage the bacterial cell wall and render the Gram stain appear negative. Even when these special stains properly highlight organisms of interest, they can only categorize them within a broad classi fi cation but not a speci fi c species. For example, gram-positive cocci demonstrated by tissue Gram stain in a lung section (Fig. 45 .2b ) could represent different species of Streptococci or Staphylococci, and further testing with more speci fi c assays is needed to reveal the true identity of these cocci.

Four decades ago, EM was the only ancillary technique available to the pathologists when routine H&E and special stains failed to reveal diagnostic features in histopathology [ 18 ] . EM examination provides a direct visualization of microbial organisms at a high magni fi cation. Ultrastructural fi nding is the most direct evidence to show the presence of an infectious agent in clinical specimens. Thin section and negative stain are two common EM methods used to study pathogen morphology and morphogenesis of the microorganisms with recognition of their cytoplasmic organelles and matrix constituents. Therefore, correlation of light and electron microscopic fi ndings not only improves pathologist's diagnostic acumen but also allows for a more coherent explanation of the pathogenesis. Since the advent of immunohistochemical and molecular techniques, EM has been less often used for identifying infectious agents. However, EM still played an essential role in determining the speci fi c family of the pathogen involved in several outbreaks caused by novel viruses, such as Sin Nombre virus [ 19, 20 ] , Nipah virus [ 21, 22 ] , SARS-CoV [ 12, 23 ] , and monkeypox virus [ 24 ] . In these outbreak investigations, negative stain of virus isolated from tissue culture and thin-section preparation of tissue specimen facilitated the ultrastructural examination. The determination of etiologic agents guided subsequent laboratory, clinical, and epidemiologic investigations. Advanced EM methods, such as immuno-EM or EM in situ hybridization using colloidal gold labels, have been developed for a more speci fi c ultrastructural diagnosis.

IHC has been widely used in all aspects of pathology diagnosis in the past three decades [25] [26] [27] . A large number of IHC is available that can be helpful in the identi fi cation of microorganisms. By using a variety of antibodies, IHC can detect the presence of microbial antigens in tissue specimens, whether they represent the intact or degraded pathogens, and whether they are intracellular or extracellular (Fig. 45.2c ) . Therefore, IHC has become a powerful technique used by pathologists for tissue diagnosis of infectious diseases. There are many ways to visualize an antibody-antigen interaction. The most common method is to apply an antibody conjugated to an enzyme, such as peroxidase [28] [29] [30] or alkaline phosphatase [ 31, 32 ] , which can further catalyze a reaction for colorimetric detection. The antibodies used for speci fi c detection can be polyclonal or monoclonal. Polyclonal antibodies are a heterogeneous mixture of antibodies that recognize several epitopes of a speci fi c organism or more commonly, a group of related organisms. Monoclonal antibodies are generated against a single epitope and hence more speci fi c to the target antigen than polyclonal antibodies. Many of these antibodies are commercially available and are widely used in diagnostic pathology laboratories. Others, especially those antibodies for detecting novel emerging pathogens, are available only at highly specialized centers such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Development of new IHC is a worthwhile but usually labor-intensive task. Similar to all other laboratory assays, the sensitivity and speci fi city of any IHC always need a careful evaluation before establishing its status as a diagnostic assay. Detection of two or more target antigens on one slide can be achieved with multiple staining IHC assays [33] [34] [35] . These assays can expand the information obtained from each slide and reduce turnaround-time compared to single staining or sequential staining methods. It is possible to assess the topographic relationship of the targets by using multiple staining IHC assays for determining the cellular tropism of viral infection with antibodies raised against virus and speci fi c cellular markers respectively (Fig. 45.1c ) . These multiple staining methods not only help con fi rm the immunolocalization of pathogens but also enhance further understanding of pathogenesis in many emerging infections [ 7, 16, 19 ] .

There are many advantages of using formalin-fi xed tissues and IHC to detect etiologic pathogens. It is particular useful in detecting those fastidious or slowgrowing organisms, such as mycobacteria [ 36, 37 ] or Tropheryma whipplei [ 38 ] , and can improve the speed, sensitivity, and speci fi city of microbial diagnosis. It is also valuable for characterizing emerging infections, whose causes are initially unknown, such as those caused by Nipah virus [ 21 ] or SARS-CoV [ 12 ] . Immunolocalization of antigens by IHC provides histomorphologic correlation between the infectious pathogen and host tissue responses, which is not only crucial for diagnosis but also important to study the pathogenesis of those emerging infections [ 19, 21, 39, 40 ] . Additionally, IHC performed on fi xed tissues can minimize laboratory worker's potential risk of exposure to infectious agents because of the deactivation of pathogens by formalin fi xation. Another advantage of using IHC is its capability of detecting well-preserved microbial antigens in archived formalin-fi xed, paraf fi n-embedded (FFPE) tissues, which allows retrospective studies of many emerging pathogens even after decades of archive [ 41, 42 ] .

ISH is a technique that uses fl uorescent or radiolabeled nucleic acid probes comprising complementary DNA or RNA strand to localize speci fi c sequences in tissue sections [ 43, 44 ] . It has been applied in many medical diagnostics, such as gene expression pro fi ling, chromosomal integrity, and karyotyping, etc. There are also many ways to perform ISH in diagnosis of infectious pathogens with a variety of probes [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] , including double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) probes, single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) probes, RNA probes (riboprobes), and synthetic oligonucleotides (oligoprobes). ISH can localize nucleic acids of microorganisms in tissues and provides histomorphologic correlation between the infectious pathogen and host tissue responses, similar to IHC. The advantages of using formalin-fi xed tissues and ISH to detect etiologic pathogens are also similar to IHC, except it is usually less sensitive than IHC because of the potential fragmentation of target nucleic acids by formalin fi xation [ 51, 52 ] . On the other hand, ISH can utilize in-house probes synthesized in a well-equipped laboratory with known sequences of the target nucleic acids, minimizing the need to depend on commercial resources.

PCR ampli fi cation undoubtedly is the most sensitive method available to detect microbial organisms in tissue specimens and has become a common practice in many pathology laboratories. PCR can be performed on FFPE samples [53] [54] [55] [56] ; therefore diagnoses can be made even if cultures were not obtained initially from biopsy or autopsy at the time of processing. In addition, molecular identi fi cation can accelerate de fi nitive diagnosis of fastidious organisms that either grow slowly or does not grow at all with culture methods. When combined with other techniques mentioned above, PCR has markedly improved the capabilities of providing rapid and accurate detection of many emerging and reemerging pathogens as well as pathogens commonly encountered in medical practice.

PCR requires the isolation of nucleic acids from microorganisms in clinical samples and needs to apply adjunct techniques with restriction endonuclease enzymes, gel electrophoresis (Fig. 45.2d ) , and other nucleic acid hybridization methods. Degenerate primers can be employed in PCR assays at reduced stringency to facilitate detection of related but unknown organisms [ 12, 57, 58 ] . A vast number of PCR-based techniques have been developed in the past two decades and have been increasingly applied to clinical samples. For instance, multiplex PCR has been shown to increase the diagnostic yield in acute respiratory tract infections and contribute to overall improved outcome in patient care [ 59, 60 ] . New platforms such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) combine nucleic acid ampli fi cation and fl uorescent detection of the ampli fi ed product in the same closed system, resulting in an excellent technique that can diagnose a wide spectrum of infectious pathogens with tremendous fl exibility, rapidity, and accuracy [ 55, 59, [61] [62] [63] . Nucleic acid sequence analysis has become highly automated and is now practical for use in many diagnostic and reference laboratories for the identi fi cation of a large number of microorganisms, whether they are cultivatable or not.

One particularly prevalent utility of PCR is the usage of wide-range paneubacteria 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) PCR for detecting unknown bacterial organisms in tissue specimens. 16S rRNA is 1,542 nt in length and is a component of the 30S subunit of prokaryotic ribosomes. The16S rRNA gene in bacteria contains wellconserved sequences that can be used as binding sites for universal PCR primers adjacent to variable sequences [64] [65] [66] . Subsequent analyses and comparisons of the sequences from amplicons to databases of known sequences can provide valuable information for etiologic diagnosis and further speciation. A set of broad-range PCR primers directed against conserved regions in the 16S rRNA gene was designed to speci fi cally amplify either gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria [ 67 ] . These differential 16S rRNA gene PCR assays provide more speci fi c information regarding the bacteria identity and are very useful for detecting bacterial pathogens in tissue samples in conjunction with histopathologic evaluation, special stains, and IHC.

Despite their high sensitivity, PCR techniques often face challenges from potential contamination issues. Processing of tissue samples, especially autopsy tissues, is often performed under a rather lax sterile condition and may enhance the chance of contamination. Many infectious pathogens can be present in the environment as commensals and their clinical relevance from PCR testing results can be confounded by such nature. Therefore, the PCR results should always be evaluated within the context of other diagnostic criteria. Moreover, any PCR testing of formalin-fi xed tissues may be compromised by damage to DNA caused by the fi xative. It is also important to know that identi fi cation to the species level may not be rigorous because the target gene may contain limited amount of sequence data available for comparison.

Microarrays can be performed on frozen tissue samples and may be helpful when multiplex PCR or other nucleic acid methods fail [68] [69] [70] . However, the sensitivity is generally lower than those multiplex PCR methods. Viral microarrays can be roughly divided into those targeting 10-100 agents and those designed for detection of thousands of agents, including unknown pathogens. Arrays designed to address a limited number of agents may employ multiplex consensus PCR to amplify speci fi c genetic targets. Oligonucleotide microarrays with probes of up to 70 nt can offer a considerable advantage for detection of rapidly evolving targets, such as RNA viruses because these arrays are less likely to be confounded by minor sequence variation. Viral microarrays can facilitate sequence analysis and pathogen identi fi cation [ 68, [71] [72] [73] . Additionally, both microbial and host gene targets can incorporated in these high-density arrays, thus allows an opportunity to detect microbes and assess related host responses simultaneously for pathogenic features consistent with various classes of infectious agents.

Other advanced pathology techniques such as confocal microscopy [ 74 ] , proteomics [75] [76] [77] , laser capture microdissection (LCM) [ 78, 79 ] , and in situ PCR [ 80 ] have been used sparingly for detecting novel pathogens in a few specialized laboratories. Although they can become potentially powerful tools for diagnosis of emerging infections, most of them remain as pilot utilities and need further optimization to gain wide acceptance as mainstream techniques in practice of infectious diseases pathology.

Appropriate clinical specimen collection, transport, and processing are crucial to establish an accurate laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases. Similarly, adequate tissue sampling is the fi rst and the most important step to obtain an organism-speci fi c diagnosis of infectious diseases by using pathology techniques. The pathology laboratory must have practical guidelines for optimal specimen collection and handling, and should communicate this information to the clinical staff and patient care sites. It is prudent to obtain biopsy or surgical samples from the precise site of infection and preferably before initiation of therapy to minimize the impact of treatment on subsequent diagnostic tests. This is particularly true for bacterial or fungal infections. Tissue specimens obtained surgically are acquired at great expense and pose considerable risk to the patient; therefore they should be procured with an amount of material adequate for both histopathologic and microbiological examination. Swabs are rarely adequate for this purpose. Representative samples from all major organs should be collected in autopsy cases, especially those unexplained fatal cases due to infectious causes.

Etiologic pathogens may be focally or sparsely present in involved organs and only a complete postmortem examination can attentively localize the causative organisms, as well as the full spectrum of their pathologic effects. In addition, the predilection site for infection may vary among different organisms. For example, herpes simplex virus tends to involve temporal lobe in the brain more frequently, while West Nile virus usually causes more severe infection in brain stem and spinal cord. Moreover, since multiple organs can be involved in the context of systemic diseases, collecting multiple representative portions of target organs with syndromebased approach (Table 45. 3 ) and tissue samples from any other organ system with fi ndings suggestive of infection ensures the best chance of detecting the causative agent. In fl uenza-associated myocarditis is a good example to show the dif fi culty of identifying in fl uenza virus in the heart tissue even with prominent histopathologic changes of myocarditis, while the evidence of infection is usually present in the respiratory tissues [ 81 ] . FFPE tissue samples are usually adequate for routine H&E stain, special stains, IHC, and ISH assays. However, prolonged formalin fi xation can cause cross-linking of proteins and nucleic acids in tissues and hence decrease the sensitivity of IHC, ISH, or PCR assays. In general, antigens and nucleic acids in tissue samples can be well preserved in paraf fi n-embedded blocks if formalin fi xation does not exceed 2 weeks. It is highly recommended to embed tissue samples in paraf fi n no longer than 72 h after adequate formalin fi xation. Although FFPE blocks can also be used for ultrastructural examination, it is preferably to dissect tissue samples into small thin pieces (1 mm 3 ), placed in glutaraldehyde fi xative, and stored in a refrigerator for optimal EM studies.

Sterile techniques are mandatory to obtain target tissue samples for microbiologic culture and PCR assays. While biopsy procedure is usually performed under a stringent sterile condition, autopsy is not. In addition, delay of postmortem examination will facilitate colonization by normal fl ora or contamination by environmental organisms and interfere subsequent diagnostic assays. Therefore, autopsy should be performed as soon as possible (preferably within 12 h after death) to minimize these postmortem confounding factors. Representative tissue samples for potential PCR assay should be obtained with sterile technique and frozen at −70 °C. It is noteworthy that FFPE can also be used for PCR testing if frozen samples are not readily available, but the sensitivity is usually lower because of the chemical property of formalin fi xative mentioned earlier. 

Diagnosis with pathologic techniques provides histomorphologic correlation for a speci fi c infectious agent with the disease it causes and is essential for identifying the cause of death. It helps identify or con fi rm the etiology of an outbreak caused by a novel pathogen, especially from severe or fatal cases. It is crucial for management of clinical patient with unknown etiology of infection, control and prevention for emerging disease outbreak, epidemiologic surveillance, and study of pathogenesis. Tissue samples, especially postmortem specimens, should be collected adequately and promptly. They should be preserved in proper media and processed in a timely fashion. The histopathologic features identi fi ed in the tissue specimens in conjunction with relevant clinical and epidemiologic information should determine performance of speci fi c IHC, ultrastructural, molecular, or other assays.

There are limitations of using pathologic techniques despite the advantages. Because immune mechanisms can greatly amplify the host response, the actual numbers of pathogens present in tissues can be relatively small. This means that many sections may need to be examined before a pathogen is identi fi ed. Topographic issues related to tissue sampling can also affect the outcome of tests. If the tissue specimens are not obtained from relevant lesions or areas with histopathologic changes, the subsequent tests performed on such specimens can all result in falsenegative outcomes. Timing of tissue sampling, as mentioned earlier, is another crucial element that can affect test results. Delayed autopsy procedure increases the chance of tissue autolysis and postmortem contamination, which can signi fi cantly interfere with histopathologic evaluation and all related pathologic tests. Technical issues, such as sensitivity and speci fi city, are universally present for each IHC, ISH, or PCR testing. A negative result cannot exclude the possibility of an infection caused by certain organisms because duration of illness, modalities of treatment, tissue sampling and fi xation may affect the outcome of these assays. Therefore, a correlation of the test results with clinical history, epidemiological information, and other laboratory assays is highly recommended for a more accurate interpretation involving in patient care and public health management.

Pathology and emerging infections-quo vadimus?

The critical role of pathology in the investigation of bioterrorism-related cutaneous anthrax

Will pathologists play as important a role in the future as they have in the past against the challenge of infectious diseases

Infectious disease pathology

Leptospirosis associated with outbreak of acute febrile illness and pulmonary haemorrhage

The role of pathology in an investigation of an outbreak of West Nile encephalitis in New York

pandemic in fl uenza A (H1N1): pathology and pathogenesis of 100 fatal cases in the United States

Histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of fatal in fl uenza virus infection in children during the 2003-2004 season

Molecular pathology-diagnosis of infectious disease

Molecular pathology in forensic medicineintroduction

Diagnostic pathology and laboratory medicine in the age of

A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome

Newly discovered coronavirus as the primary cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-paradigm of an emerging viral infection

Lung pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a study of 8 autopsy cases from Singapore

Immunohistochemical, in situ hybridization, and ultrastructural localization of SARS-associated coronavirus in lung of a fatal case of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Taiwan

Identi fi cation of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome

Diagnostic ultrastructural pathology-sub-speciality or special stain?

Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Pathogenesis of an emerging infectious disease

Ultrastructural characteristics of Sin Nombre virus, causative agent of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome

Nipah virus infection: pathology and pathogenesis of an emerging paramyxoviral zoonosis

Elucidation of Nipah virus morphogenesis and replication using ultrastructural and molecular approaches

Monkeypox virus: histologic, immunohistochemical and electronmicroscopic fi ndings

The increasing power of immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry

The contribution of immunohistochemical staining in tumour diagnosis

Beyond hematoxylin and eosin-the role of immunohistochemistry in surgical pathology

The unlabeled antibody enzyme method of immunohistochemistry: preparation and properties of soluble antigen-antibody complex (horseradish peroxidase-antihorseradish peroxidase) and its use in identi fi cation of spirochetes

A simpli fi ed method for the rapid preparation of peroxidase-anti peroxidase (PAP) complexes

Rapid preparation of peroxidase: anti-peroxidase complexes for immunocytochemical use

Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes)

Immunoalkaline phosphatase technique applied to paraf fi n wax embedded tissues in diagnostic renal pathology

Alkaline phosphatase and peroxidase for double immunoenzymatic labelling of cellular constituents

Double-immunostaining method using biotin-conjugated primary antibodies from the same species

Multiple antigen immunostaining procedures

Polyclonal antibodies raised against Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, Mycobacterium duvalii , and Mycobacterium paratuberculosis used to detect mycobacteria in tissue with the use of immunohistochemical techniques

Evaluation of an immunohistochemical test with polyclonal antibodies raised against mycobacteria used in formalinfi xed tissue compared with mycobacterial speci fi c culture

Diagnosis of Wihipple disease by immunohistochemical analysis: a sensitive and speci fi c method for the detection of Tropheryma whipplei (the Whipple bacillus) in paraf fi n-embedded tissue

Fatal malaria infection in travelers: novel immunohistochemical assays for the detection of Plasmodium falciparum in tissues and implications for pathogenesis

Immunohistochemical and in situ localization of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus in human tissues and implications for CCHF pathogenesis

Retrospective diagnosis of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, 1978-1993: implications for emerging infectious diseases

A retrospective immunohistochemical study reveals atypical scrapie has existed in the United Kingdom since at least 1987

In situ hybridization: methods and applications

Interphase cytogenetics in pathology: principles, methods, and applications of fl uorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

Optimal probe size and fi xation time for the detection of porcine circovirus-2 DNA by in situ hybridization in formalin-fi xed, paraf fi n-embedded tissue

Simultaneous detection of HBV-speci fi c antigens and DNA in paraf fi n-embedded liver tissue by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization using a digoxigenin-labeled probe

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: investigation of three cases using in situ hybridization with JC virus biotinylated DNA probe

In situ hybridization using a biotinylated DNA probe on formalin-fi xed liver biopsies with hepatitis B virus infections: in situ hybridization superior to immunochemistry

Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae -DNA within diseased gingiva by in situ hybridization using a biotin-labeled probe

Localization of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection in boars by in situ riboprobe hybridization

Detection of early infection of swine vesicular disease virus in porcine cells and skin sections. A comparison of immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridization

Molecular and immunological methods to detect rotavirus in formalin-fi xed tissue

Value of PCR ampli fi cation from formalin-fi xed paraf fi n-embedded tissues in the diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Detection of West Nile virus in formalinfi xed, paraf fi n-embedded human tissues by RT-PCR: a useful adjunct to conventional tissuebased diagnostic methods

Diagnosis of in fl uenza from respiratory autopsy tissues detection of virus by real-time reverse transcription-PCR in 222 cases

Duplex PCR assay simultaneously detecting and differentiating Bartonella quintana , B. henselae , and Coxiella burnetii in surgical heart valve specimens

Methods for detection and differentiation of existing and new crinivirus species through multiplex and degenerate primer RT-PCR

Nipah virus: a recently emergent deadly paramyxovirus

Multiplex quantitative PCR for detection of lower respiratory tract infection and meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus in fl uenzae and Neisseria meningitidis

Simultaneous detection of respiratory viruses in children with acute respiratory infection using two different multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assays

Comparison of the Luminex Respiratory Virus Panel fast assay with in-house real-time PCR for respiratory viral infection diagnosis

Comparative evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional RT-PCR during a 2 year surveillance for in fl uenza and respiratory syncytial virus among children with acute respiratory infections in Kolkata, India, reveals a distinct seasonality of infection

Real-time PCR to improve the diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection

16S ribosomal DNA ampli fi cation for phylogenetic study

Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identi fi cation of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases

PCR primers and probes for the 16S rRNA gene of most species of pathogenic bacteria, including bacteria found in cerebrospinal fl uid

Gram type-speci fi c broad-range PCR ampli fi cation for rapid detection of 62 pathogenic bacteria

Nonparametric methods for the analysis of singlecolor pathogen microarrays

Post-genomic virology: the impact of bioinformatics, microarrays and proteomics on investigating host and pathogen interactions

Oligosaccharide microarrays for high-throughput detection and speci fi city assignments of carbohydrate-protein interactions

Diagnostics and discovery in viral hemorrhagic fevers

A new arenavirus in a cluster of fatal transplantassociated diseases

Handbook of biological confocal microscopy

The use of proteomics to study infectious diseases

Proteomics and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): emerging technology meets emerging pathogen

Application of proteomics methods for pathogen discovery

Microdissection by exclusion and DNA extraction for multiple PCR analyses from archival tissue sections

Combining laser capture microdissection and proteomics: methodologies and clinical applications

situ PCR: protocols and applications

In fl uenza A virus infection complicated by fatal myocarditis