id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-295375-nakxfhxk	Yu, Yang	Assessment of the quality of systematic reviews on COVID‐19: A comparative study of previous coronavirus outbreaks	2020-04-28		.txt	text/plain	2455	143	48	In this comparative study, we investigated the present status of conducting SRs on COVID-19, MERS, and SARS, appraised the methodological quality of these SRs using the a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR 2), and performed a preliminary examination of the potential risk factors associated with the quality of SRs, with the aim of providing suggestions from the aspects of methodological quality for conducting and using SRs during the COVID-19 pandemic. AMSTAR, a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews; MA, meta-analysis quality of most SRs is unsatisfactory, and those on COVID-19 have higher risks of poor quality, despite the rapid actions taken to conduct SRs. Teams that may want to conduct a SR should focus on the study design and focus on improving the quality of the SR. Prevalence of comorbidities in the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): a systematic review and meta-analysis	./cache/cord-295375-nakxfhxk.txt	./txt/cord-295375-nakxfhxk.txt