key: cord-257644-9f30s0gy authors: Mu, Xingjiang; Pridgeon, Julia W.; Klesius, Phillip H. title: Comparative transcriptional analysis reveals distinct expression patterns of channel catfish genes after the first infection and re-infection with Aeromonas hydrophila date: 2013-09-12 journal: Fish Shellfish Immunol DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2013.08.027 sha: doc_id: 257644 cord_uid: 9f30s0gy To determine whether transcriptional levels of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) genes are differentially regulated between a first infection with Aeromonas hydrophila and a re-infection, suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) was performed in this study using anterior kidney cDNA after the re-infection as tester. Of the 96 clones isolated from the SSH library, 28 unique expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were obtained, of which eight were confirmed to be slightly but significantly (P < 0.05) more up-regulated by the re-infection at 6 h post infection (hpi). Expression kinetics studies at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hpi revealed that the eight ESTs were significantly (P = 0.016) more up-regulated by the first infection, with a major peak at 3 hpi. A total of 96 genes reported in literature to be up-regulated by bacterial infections were selected and subjected to expression analysis at 3 hpi. Of the 96 selected genes, 19 were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) induced by A. hydrophila after the first infection and the re-infection. The 19 genes belonged to the following five main categories: 1) toll-like receptor (TLR2, TLR3, TLR5, TLR21); 2) antimicrobial peptide (NK-lysin type 1, NK-lysin type 2, NK-lysin type 3, cathepsin D, transferrin, hepcidin); 3) cytokine or chemokine (interleukin-1β, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor α, chemokine CXCL-10); 4) signaling proteins (cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1, very large inducible GTPase 1, arginine deiminase type 2, lymphokine-activated killer T-cell originated protein kinase); 5) lysozyme (lysozyme c). Overall, the total 27 genes (8 ESTs plus the 19 selected genes) were significantly (P < 0.001) more induced by the first infection. Peaked expression of lysozyme c and serum lysozyme activity after the first infection were seen at 24 hpi, whereas that after the re-infection were seen at 12 hpi, suggesting that both innate and adaptive immunity were involved in the defense against the re-infection of A. hydrophila. Aeromonas hydrophila is a causative agent of motile aeromonad septicaemia (MAS) [1, 2] . Swelling of tissues, dropsy, red sores, necrosis, ulceration, and hemorrhagic septicemia are typical symptoms of MAS [3, 4] . Many fish species can be affected by MAS, including tilapia [5, 6] , catfish [7, 8] , goldfish [9, 10] , common carp [11, 12] , and eel [13] . As an opportunistic pathogen, A. hydrophila caused outbreaks in fish farms with high mortality rates [14e16] . In West Alabama, MAS disease outbreak caused by A. hydrophila in 2009 alone has led to an estimated loss of more than 3 million pounds of food size channel catfish [17] . Virulence studies have revealed that AL09-71, a 2009 West Alabama isolate of A. hydrophila used in this study, is highly virulent to channel catfish, killing fish within 24 h post exposure [18] . Both innate and adaptive immunity play important roles in the defense of fish against bacterial infections [19] . Immunity of fish to bacterial infections is largely mediated by cellular immune responses with humoral antibodies having a secondary role [20, 21] . It was reported that live attenuated A. hydrophila induced the upregulation of multiple immune genes in channel catfish [22] . In addition, infection with A. hydrophila induced peak up-regulation of several genes at 6 h post injection (hpi) [22] . However, it was unknown whether gene expression levels in channel catfish after re-infection with A. hydrophila were induced higher compared to that by the first infection. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to: 1) identify up-regulated genes in channel catfish after a second infection of A. hydrophila compared to a single infection at 6 hpi by suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH); 2) compare the gene expression patterns of at different time (0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hpi) after the first infection and the re-infection to determine the peak response time; and 3) screen genes that were reported in literature and identify genes up-regulated by the first infection and the re-infection at the peak response time. The AL09-71 isolate of A. hydrophila was obtained from diseased channel catfish in 2009 from West Alabama. The isolate has been confirmed to be A. hydrophila through biochemical and molecular identification [17] . Bacterial cultures were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 24 h at 28 C. Channel catfish (26.2 AE 3.3 g) were obtained from stocks maintained at USDA-ARS, Aquatic Animal Health Research Laboratory (Auburn, AL, USA). All fish were maintained in dechlorinated water in 340 L tanks. Prior to experiments, fish were acclimated in flow-through 57-L aquaria supplied with w0.5 L h À1 de-chlorinated water for 14 days. Experimental fish were confirmed to be culture-negative for bacterial infection by culturing posterior kidney tissues from representative groups of fish on tryptic soy agar plates. A 12:12 h light:dark period was maintained and supplemental aeration was supplied by air stones. Mean dissolved oxygen was w5.6 mg L À1 at water temperature w27 C, with pH w7.1 and hardness w100 mg L À1 . Fish were fed w3% body weight daily with commercial dry fish food. Prior to the experimental infection, fish were moved to 57-L flow through aquaria and acclimated for 14 days. The sub-lethal infection dose of A. hydrophila AL09-71 given to fish was 1 Â 10 4 colony forming unit per fish (CFU/fish) based on previous challenge result (LD 50 ¼ 1 Â 10 5 CFU/fish [17] ). Prior to injection, thirty untreated fish were used to collect samples at 0 h. The remaining fish were divided into three groups (150 fish/group): 1) control group [intraperitoneally (IP) injection with 100 ml TSB]; 2) Innate group (IP injection with A. hydrophila AL09-71 at 1 Â 10 4 CFU/fish); 3) Adaptive group (IP injection with A. hydrophila AL09-71 at 1 Â 10 4 CFU/fish followed by a second injection with A. hydrophila AL09-71 at 2 Â 10 4 CFU/fish at 28 days post first injection). Anterior kidney samples were collected from 30 fish at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hpi and 10 tissues were pooled together as one sample (10 fish/pool, 3 pools per time point). All anterior kidney tissues were flash frozen on dry ice immediately after sampling and stored at À80 C until RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated from anterior kidney tissues using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following the manufacturer's protocol. All RNAs were treated with DNase provided by the DNAfree kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) to eliminate any DNA in the RNA sample. RNA samples were quantified on a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Rockland, DE). The first strand cDNAs used for quantitative PCR were synthesized using 2 mg of total RNA, AMV reverse transcriptase, and Oligo-dT primer provided by the cloned AMV first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For subtractive library construction, total RNAs were extracted from pooled anterior kidney samples at 6 hpi after the first infection or the re-infection of A. hydrophila AL09-71. The 6 hpi time point was chosen based on previous research results on gene upregulation in channel catfish in response to A. hydrophila [22] . cDNAs were then synthesized using PCR-select cDNA Subtraction Kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Two-step subtractive hybridizations were performed according to procedures described previously [22] . Briefly, two primary hybridization reactions (A and B) were formed by adding excess amounts of first infection cDNA (driver) to second infection cDNA (tester) samples at a 50:1 ratio. The samples were denatured for 2 min at 98 C and allowed to anneal for 8 h at 68 C. The remaining single-stranded, adaptor-ligated tester cDNAs were substantially enriched in each hybridization reaction for overexpressed sequences because non-target cDNAs present in the tester and driver could form hybrids. After filling in the adapter ends with DNA polymerase, over-expressed sequences (tester cDNA) had different annealing sites on their 3 0 -and 5 0 -ends. The molecules were then subjected to suppression subtraction PCR. The PCR products were then cloned into pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI). Plasmids were transformed into One Shot Ò TOP10 competent cells (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Transformed cells were plated on LuriaeBertani (LB) plates containing ampicillin (100 mg/ ml) and X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside) (40 mg/ml). From the library, a total of 96 colonies were subsequently picked to grow overnight in Lysogeny broth (LB) in the presence of ampicillin (100 mg/ml) at 37 C and 235 rpm in InnovaÔ 4000 Incubator Shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ). Overnight cultures were then sent to USDA-ARS MSA Genomics Laboratory in Stoneville, MS for plasmid DNA extraction and DNA sequencing with an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Raw sequence base calling and trimming was conducted at the MSA Genomics Laboratory by using Phred with a cut-off score of Q20. Vector and adaptor sequences were manually trimmed. Trimmed cDNA sequences were then analyzed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) BLAST program to search for sequence homologies. Sequencing results of different clones were used to design genespecific primers (Supplementary Table 1 ) by using the Primer3 program (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www. cgi). Quantitative PCR (QPCR) was performed using Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For each cDNA sample, channel catfish 18S ribosomal RNA primers were included as an internal control to normalize the variation in cDNA amount as published previously [22] . All QPCR was performed using Platinum Ò SYBR Ò Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG with ROX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in a total volume of 12.5 ml. The QPCR mixture consisted of 1 ml of cDNA (input RNA of 10 ng), 0.5 ml of 5 mM gene-specific forward primer, 0.5 ml of 5 mM gene-specific reverse primer and 10.5 ml of 1 Â SYBR Green SuperMix. The QPCR thermal cycling parameters were 50 C for 2 min, 95 C for 10 min followed by 40 cycle of 95 C for 15 s and 60 C for 1 min. All QPCR was run in duplicate for each pooled cDNA sample (10 kidney samples per pool; three pools were analyzed). The fluorescence intensities of the control and treatment products for each gene, as measured by cycle threshold (C t ) values, were compared and converted to fold differences by the relative quantification method [23] using the Relative Expression Software Tool 384 v. 1 (REST) and assuming 100% efficiencies. Expression differences between control and treatment groups were assessed for statistical significance using a randomization test in the REST software. The mRNA expression levels of all samples were normalized to the levels of 18S ribosomal RNA gene in the same sample. Expression levels of 18S were constant between all samples (<0.30 change in C t ). Each primer set amplified a single product as indicated by a single peak present for each gene during melting curve analysis. The relative transcriptional levels of different genes were determined by subtracting the cycle threshold (C t ) of the sample by that of the 18S rRNA, the calibrator or internal control, as per the formula: DC t ¼ C t (sample) À C t (calibrator). The relative expression level of a specific gene at different time points were compared to that of fish at time 0 using formula 2 ÀDDCt where DDC t ¼ DC t (time point x) À DC t (time point 0) as described previously [22] . To search for more channel catfish genes that might be differentially induced by a re-infection of A. hydrophila compared to that by a first infection, a total of 96 channel catfish genes reported in literature were screened in this study, including the following: 1) 43 genes induced by Edwardsiella ictaluri [24] ; 2) 28 genes upregulated by Flavobacterium columnare [25] ; 3) 5 toll-like receptors (TLRs) up-regulated by E. ictaluri [26] ; 4) 20 genes upregulated by A. hydrophila [22] . Primers for these 96 genes were purchased from SigmaeAldrich (St. Louis, MO). Lysozyme activity was measured using published procedures [27, 28] with slight modifications. Briefly, lyophilized Micrococcus lysodeikticus (SigmaeAldrich) at a concentration of 0.2 mg/ml in sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M; pH 6.0) was used as a substrate. Serum (20 ml/well in duplicate) from ten fish/group at different time points after injected with TSB or A. hydrophila were placed in a 96-well plate containing 250 ml of M. lysodeikticus cell suspension per well. Hen egg white (HEW) lysozyme was used as an external standard. The absorbance values of 0 min and 20 min post incubation (30 C) were measured at 450 nm. The rate of reduction in absorbance of samples was converted to lysozyme concentration (mg/ml) using a standard curve of HEW lysozyme. The results were expressed as mg/ml equivalent of HEW lysozyme. The effect of serum on cell proliferation was performed using published procedures [29, 30] with slight modifications. Serum samples collected at 28 days post first or second injection of A. hydrophila was used in this study. Briefly, logarithmic phase A. hydrophila AL09-71 bacterial cultures were diluted in tryptic soy broth to make a final concentration of 1.0 Â 10 6 CFU/mL based on published procedures [29, 30] . The assay mixture contained 10 mL serum and 50 mL diluted bacterial culture. Heat-inactivated (70 C, 30 min) serum samples at 28 days post first or second injection of A. hydrophila were used as negative controls. Plates were incubated at 28 C for 2 h. The number of viable cells in each well was determined by CellTiter 96 Ò AQ ueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation inner salt] (MTS) and an electron coupling reagent phenazine methosulfate (PMS) was added to each well. The MTS was then bioreduced by viable cells into a formazan product. The absorbance of the formazan product was measured at 490 nm using a BioRad 680 microplate reader (Biorad, Hercules, CA) at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, and 180 min post MTS addition. Relative increases in OD values were calculated using the following formula: Increased OD value ¼ OD value after incubation À OD value at 0 min of incubation. All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat 3.5 software (Systat Software, Inc, Point Richmond, CA). Differences in expression levels of gene at one time point, lysozyme activity, and inhibitory effect on cell proliferation were analyzed with Student ttest and the significance level was defined as P < 0.05. Statistical differences of expression levels of up-regulated genes at different time points after first infection compared to that after the second infection were analyzed with ManneWhitney U significance test, a well-known non-parametric statistical hypothesis test to assess whether one of two samples of independent observations tends to have larger values than the other. A total of 96 clones were obtained from the subtractive library using the secondary infected fish as tester and primary infected fish as driver. All 96 clones were subjected to sequencing. Of the 96 clones, 94 contained inserts. BlastN analysis revealed that 28 unique expressed sequence tags (ESTs) ( Table 1) were obtained from the 94 inserts. The insert sizes of the 28 unique ESTs ranged from 124 bp to 1054 bp, with average size of 452 bp (Table 1) . Eighteen and seven of the 28 sequences shared high identities with channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) and zebra fish (Danio rerio), respectively ( Table 1 ). The 28 ESTs listed in Table 1 were deposited in GenBank dbEST under accession numbers JK993536 to JK993563. Of the 28 unique ESTs, 8 were significantly (P < 0.05) more upregulated by the second exposure to A. hydrophila compared to that by the first exposure at 6 hpi (Fig. 1) . Of the 8 ESTs, two (A10: XbaI element 5 and B04: XbaI element 7) were up-regulated greater than 6-fold by the second infection (Fig. 1) . The other six ESTs that were also significantly more up-regulated by the second infection were: 1) A08: TLR20-1; 2) C04: inward rectifier potassium channel 13; 3) C09: immunoglobulin heavy chain gene locus; 4) C11: prolactin; 5) C12: NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2; 6) E05: reverse transcriptase-like protein (Fig. 1 ). Expression kinetics studies at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hpi revealed that the 8 ESTs were significantly (P ¼ 0.016) more up-regulated by the first infection, with a major peak at 3 hpi (Fig. 2) . The significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression levels of TLR20-1 induced by first infection compared to that by second infection peaked at 3 hpi, followed by a decreased peak at 24 hpi ( Fig. 2A) . Similar expression pattern was observed for XbaI element 5 (Fig. 2B) , XbaI element 7 (Fig. 2C) , inward rectifier potassium channel 13 (Fig. 2D) , immunoglobulin heavy chain locus gene (Fig. 2E) , and reverse transcriptase-like protein (Fig. 2H ). Significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression of prolactin (Fig. 2F ) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (Fig. 2G ) induced by first infection compared to that by second infection with the peak at 3 hpi were also observed. Based on expression kinetics study results of the 8 ESTs identified by SSH, the time point of 3 hpi was chosen to screen the 96 selected genes. Of the 96 genes selected from literature, 19 were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) induced by A. hydrophila at 3 hpi compared to that by TSB, regardless whether it was the first infection or the re-infection. The 19 genes belonged to the following five main categories: 1) toll-like receptor (TLR2, TLR3, TLR5, TLR21); 2) antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (NK-lysin type 1, NK-lysin type 2, NK-lysin type 3, cathepsin D, transferrin, hepcidin); 3) cytokine or chemokine (interleukin-1b/IL-1b, interleukin-10/IL-10, tumor necrosis factor a/TNFa, chemokine CXCL-10); 4) signaling proteins (cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1, very large inducible GTPase 1, arginine deiminase type 2, lymphokine-activated killer T-cell originated protein kinase); 5) lysozyme (lysozyme c). Overall, the expression of the four TLRs identified by the screen at various time points was significantly (P ¼ 0.005) more induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection. The expression of TLR2 (Fig. 3A) after injection with A. hydrophila once and twice both peaked at 3 hpi, with no statistical difference (P > 0.05) between the two. At 6 hpi, TLR2 was significantly (P < 0.05) more induced by the second infection compared to that by the first infection (Fig. 3A) . At 12 and 24 hpi, TLR2 was significantly (P < 0.05) more induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection (Fig. 3A) . Similar pattern was also observed for TLR3 (Fig. 3B) and TLR21 (Fig. 3D) . However, the expression pattern of TLR5 (Fig. 3C) after the first infection of A. hydrophila was not statistically different from that after the second infection. The significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression level of TLR5 in fish injected with A. hydrophila compared to that with TSB peaked at 3 hpi (Fig. 3C) . Overall, the expression of the six AMPs identified by the screen at various time points was significantly (P < 0.001) more induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection. Of the 6 AMPs identified by the screen, the expression levels of transferrin (Fig. 4A ) and hepcidin (Fig. 4B) induced by A. hydrophila were the highest (>50 fold). The expression of transferrin had a major peak at 12 hpi, regardless whether it was a first infection or a second infection (Fig. 4A) . The expression of hepcidin had peaks at 3 and 12 hpi, with significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression at 12 hpi induced by first infection (Fig. 4B) . The expression of NKlysin type 3 was highly and significantly (P < 0.05) induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection at 24 hpi (Fig. 4C) . Similar pattern was also observed for NK-lysin type 1 (Fig. 4D) and NK-lysin type 2 (Fig. 4E) . The expression of cathepsin D after infection had peak at 12 hpi, with a significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression level induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection (Fig. 4F) . Overall, the expression of the four cytokine or chemokine identified by the screen at various time points was significantly (P < 0.001) more induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection. Of the four cytokine or chemokine, the expression level of IL-10 at 12 hpi induced by the first infection was the highest (up to 80 fold) (Fig. 5A) . The expression of IL-10 had a peak at 3 hpi, regardless whether it was a first infection or a second infection (Fig. 5A ). Its peaked expression at 12 hpi induced by the first infection was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that by the second infection (Fig. 5A) . The expression pattern of IL-1b induced by the first infection was similar to that by the second infection (Fig. 5B) . However, the expression levels of IL-1b was induced significantly (P < 0.05) higher by the first infection compared to that by the second infection (Fig. 5B) . Chemokine CXCL-10 was induced the most at 24 hpi by the first infection (Fig. 5C) , which was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that by the second infection. The expression of TNFa was induced the most at 12 hpi by the first infection, which was significantly higher than that by the second infection (Fig. 5D ). Overall, the expression of the four signaling proteins identified by the screen at various time points was significantly (P < 0.001) more induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection. The expression of cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1 peaked at both 3 and 24 hpi after the first infection, with significantly higher expression induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection (Fig. 6A) . Similar pattern was observed for arginine deiminase type II (Fig. 6B) . The expression of the very large inducible GTPase 1 peaked at both 3 and 12 hpi after the first infection, with significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection (Fig. 6C) . The expression of the lymphokine-activated killer T-cell originated protein kinase also peaked at both 3 and 12 hpi after the infection, regardless whether the infection time was once or twice (Fig. 6D) . However, its highest expression was observed at 12 hpi after the first infection (Fig. 6D ). The expression of lysozyme c identified by the screen at various time points was significantly (P ¼ 0.026) more induced by the first infection compared to that by the second infection. Its expression after the first and second infection peaked at 24 and 12 hpi, respectively (Fig. 7) , with significantly (P < 0.05) higher expression induced by the first infection at both time points. Serum lysozyme activity at various time points after the first infection was significantly (P ¼ 0.005) higher than after the second infection (Fig. 8) . Its activity peaked at 24 hpi after the first infection, whereas its activity peaked at 12 hpi after the second infection. The serum lysozyme activity at 24 hpi after the first infection was significantly (P < 0.05) higher that that after the second infection (Fig. 8) . At 28 days post infection, serum of channel catfish infected with A. hydrophila exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) higher inhibitory effect on the cell proliferation of A. hydrophila compared to the serum of TSB treated control fish (Fig. 9A) , regardless whether the fish was infected once or twice. Serum of TSB treated control fish also significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited the cell proliferation of A. hydrophila (Fig. 9A) . When serum samples of fish were heatinactivated, no inhibitory effect on cell proliferation was observed (Fig. 9B ). Using SSH technique, 28 unique ESTs were identified from a total of 96 clones, of which 8 were confirmed to be slightly but significantly up-regulated by the second infection at 6 hpi compared to that by the first infection. Of the eight ESTs, two Xba elements (XbaI element 5 and XbaI element 7) were up-regulated greater than 6-fold by the second infection. In channel catfish, Xba elements were A/T-rich tandem repetitive non-coding sequences [31] . Non-coding RNA sequences play important roles in regulating transcription of protein-coding genes [32] , including immunity-related genes [33] . Transcriptome analysis of the host response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection across four founder mouse strains has revealed differential expression of 500 ncRNAs during infection [34] , indicating that differential expression of ncRNAs is widespread in response to infection. Taken together, these results suggest that the overexpression of ncRNAs such as XbaI elements might play important roles in immunity. Expression kinetics studies at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hpi revealed that the 8 ESTs were significantly more up-regulated by the first infection, with a major peak at 3 hpi. Therefore, 3 hpi was chosen to screen the 96 selected genes. Of the 96 genes selected from literature, 19 were found to be significantly induced by A. hydrophila at 3 hpi compared to that by TSB, regardless the infection time (first infection or second infection). The fact that SSH failed to identify these genes could be due to the following reasons. Firstly, we used cDNAs from the second infection as tester in an attempt to identify genes that are more up-regulated in adaptive response, which might have contributed to the failed discovery of other genes. Secondary, we chose 6 hpi instead of 3 hpi as the time point for SSH which might have contributed to the failed discovery of the known immunity-related genes identified by the screen. Nonetheless, SSH identified differentially expressed genes that were previously reported to be up-regulated by bacteria infections, including TLR20 and NADH dehydrogenase, both of which were reported to be upregulated in channel catfish by Edwardsiella icatluri infection [24, 26] . In addition, SSH also identified genes that were previously not reported to be induced by infection in channel catfish, such as XbaI elements, prolactin, and inward rectifier potassium channel. Prolactin, a peptide hormone that shares many properties with cytokines [35] , plays an important role in immunity by inducing the expression of the genes encoding the major phagocyte NADPH oxidase components and ROS production in fish macrophages via the JAK2/Stat/IRF-1 signaling pathway [36, 37] . Macrophages have two types of potassium channels: inwardly rectifying potassium channel and voltage-gated potassium channel [38, 39] . Potassium channel activity is required for the induction of nitric oxide and respiratory burst response in activated macrophages in goldfish (Carassius auratus) [40] . Of the 96 genes selected from literature, 19 were found to be significantly induced by A. hydrophila at 3 hpi, including four TLRs. Expression kinetics study revealed that the expression pattern of TLR2, TLR3, or TLR21 after the second infection was different from that after the firs infection. However, TLR5 exhibited similar expression patterns after the first and the second infections, with significant peaked up-regulation at 3 hpi. TLRs are evolutionarily conserved receptors that function in innate immunity through recognition of the conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) of an invading pathogen and eliciting inflammatory and immune responses [41] . The best characterized ligand that TLRs recognize include: (1) lipoproteins by TLR2; (2) dsRNA by TLR3; (3) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by TLR4; and (4) bacterial flagellins by TLR5 [42] . The recognition of PAMPs by TLRs will trigger an intracellular signaling cascade which activates signaling molecules such as cytokines, chemokines, interferons (IFNs), and costimulatory molecules that aid in the development of the immune response [43] . In addition to significant up-regulation of TLR5 at 3 hpi, four signaling proteins were also found to be significantly up-regulated at 3 hpi after the first infection or the second infection, including cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1, very large inducible GTPase 1, arginine deiminase, and lymphokine-activated killer T-cell originated protein kinase. At 3 hpi, the expression of the four cytokine or chemokine also peaked, although the expression of IL-1b and chemokine CXCL-10 after the first infection were the highest. When the expression levels of the total 27 genes at each time point after the first infection were compared to each other, the expression levels of the two XbaI elements were up-regulated the most (w300 fold). At 6 hpi, the expression levels of transferrin and IL-1b were the highest. At 12 hpi, the expression levels of IL-10 and chemokine CXCL-10 were the highest. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of XbaI element 5 and XbaI element 7 were the highest. At 48 hpi, transferrin had the highest expression. IL-1b is an important early response pro-inflammatory cytokine that mediates immune regulation in both innate and adaptive immunity [44] . When IL-1b was over-expressed in common carp (Cyprinus carpio), the macrophage functions such as production of superoxide anion and phagocytosis were significantly stimulated [45] . IL-10 is reported to be an anti-inflammatory cytokine that plays a crucial role in the regulation of inflammation by down-regulating expression of other cytokines such as IL-1b [46] . In consistent with previous report, we also observed the lowest expression level (<10 fold) of IL-1b at 12 hpi when IL-10 was expressed the highest (w60 fold). Significant up-regulation of hepcidin and transferrin has been reported in channel catfish after infection with E. ictaluri or A. hydrophila [22, 30] . In consistent with previous reports, this study also revealed that hepcidin and transferrin were induced by infection with A. hydrophila. Taken together, these results suggest that transcriptional regulation of immune genes plays and important role in the immunity of channel catfish against bacterial infections. When the expression levels of the 27 genes at different time points after the first infection were compared to that after the second infection, significantly higher expression levels of these genes were induced by the first infection. Lower transcriptional level of genes in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) re-infected with Yersinia ruckeri O1 at 35 days post the first infection has been previously reported [47] . Taken together, these results suggest that adaptive immunity might play an important role in the defense against the re-infection. Significantly higher bactericidal activity of serum samples at 28 days post infection with A. hydrophila was observed in this study when compared to that of fish serum treated only with TSB. In addition, peaked expression and activity of lysozyme after the first infection was at 24 hpi, whereas that after the second infection was at 12 hpi, further suggesting that adaptive immunity in fish must have developed, therefore enabling faster production of lysozyme c to kill the bacteria. In summary, 96 clones were isolated from the SSH library. Of the 96 clones, 28 ESTs were obtained, of which 8 were confirmed to be slightly but significantly more up-regulated by the twice exposure at 6 hpi. Expression kinetics studies at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hpi revealed that the 8 ESTs were significantly more up-regulated by the first infection, with a major peak at 3 hpi. Of 96 genes that were reported to be up-regulated by bacterial infections in literature, 19 were found to be significantly induced by A. hydrophila at 3 hpi. The 19 genes belonged to the following five main categories: 1) toll-like receptor (TLR2, TLR3, TLR5, TLR21); 2) antimicrobial peptide (NKlysin type 1, NK-lysin type 2, NK-lysin type 3, cathepsin D, transferrin, hepcidin); 3) cytokine or chemokine (interleukin-1b, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor a, chemokine CXCL-10); 4) signaling proteins (cadherin EGF LAG seven-pass G-type receptor 1, very large inducible GTPase 1, arginine deiminase type 2, lymphokine-activated killer T-cell originated protein kinase); 5) lysozyme (lysozyme c). Significantly (P < 0.05) higher bactericidal activity of channel catfish serum at 28 days post the first infection compared to the fish serum treated with tryptic soy broth was observed in this study. Peaked expression of lysozyme c and peaked lysozyme activity after the first infection was at 24 hpi, whereas that after the re-infection was at 12 hpi. Taken together, our results suggest that both innate and adaptive immunity were involved in the defense of catfish against the re-infection of A. hydrophila. We thank Drs. Dunhua Zhang (USDA-ARS) and Mediha Aksoy (Tuskegee University) for critical reviews of the manuscript. We thank Beth Peterman (USDA-ARS) for her excellent technical Hematological and biochemical parameters in common carp, Cyprinus carpio, following herbal treatment for Aeromonas hydrophila infection Immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) following experimental infection with Aeromonas hydrophila Aeromonas hydrophila septicaemia of Indian major carps in some commercial fish farms of West Godavari District Virulence and histopathology of Aeromonas hydrophila (Sah 93) in experimentally infected tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus (L.) Antagonism of Aeromonas hydrophila by propolis and its effect on the performance of Nile tilapia Endosulfan increases seric interleukin-2 like (IL-2L) factor and immunoglobulin M (IgM) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) challenged with Aeromona hydrophila Role of virulence plasmid of Aeromonas hydrophila in the pathogenesis of ulcerative disease syndrome in Clarias batrachus Antimicrobial peptides derived from hemoglobin are expressed in epithelium of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus, Rafinesque) Oral administration of formalin-inactivated cells of Aeromonas hydrophila A3-51 controls infection by atypical A. salmonicida in goldfish, Carassius auratus (L.) Effect of chemotherapy, vaccines and immunostimulants on innate immunity of goldfish infected with Aeromonas hydrophila Chinese herbs (Astragalus radix and Ganoderma lucidum) enhance immune response of carp, Cyprinus carpio, and protection against Aeromonas hydrophila Differences in the antibody response and survival of genetically different varieties of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) vaccinated with a commercial Aeromonas salmonicida/A. hydrophila vaccine and challenged with A. hydrophila O-serogrouping and surface components of Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas jandaei pathogenic for eels Aeromonad epidemic in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) Is Aeromonas hydrophila the dominant motile Aeromonas species that causes disease outbreaks in aquaculture production in the Zhejiang Province of China? Cloning, characterisation and expression of Aeromonas hydrophila major adhesin Molecular identification and virulence of three Aeromonas hydrophila isolates cultured from infected channel catfish during a disease outbreak in West Alabama in 2009 Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila in the presence or absence of extracellular products to channel catfish fingerlings Fish immune system: a crossroads between innate and adaptive responses Protective immunity against enteric septicaemia in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque), following controlled exposure to Edwardsiella ictaluri Immunity to bacteria in fish Transcriptional profiles of multiple genes in the anterior kidney of channel catfish vaccinated with an attenuated Aeromonas hydrophila A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR Identification and expression profile of multiple genes in the anterior kidney of channel catfish induced by modified live Edwardsiella ictaluri vaccination Identification and expression profile of multiple genes in channel catfish fry ten minutes after modified live Flavobacterium columnare vaccination Expression profiles of tolllike receptors in anterior kidney of channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque), acutely infected by Edwardsiella ictaluri On the variation in the catalytic activity of lysozyme in fishes Enzyme characterisation and gene expression profiling of Atlantic salmon chicken-and goose-type lysozymes Cloning and expression of a hepcidin gene from a marine fish (Pseudosciaena crocea) and the antimicrobial activity of its synthetic peptide Expression profiles of seven channel catfish antimicrobial peptides in response to Edwardsiella ictaluri infection Characterization of an A/T-rich family of sequences from channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs Transcription of Il17 and Il17f is controlled by conserved noncoding sequence 2 Unique signatures of long noncoding RNA expression in response to virus infection and altered innate immune signaling Prolactin, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-I in the immune system Induction of genes encoding NADPH oxidase components and activation of IFN regulatory factor-1 by prolactin in fish macrophages Prolactin-releasing peptide is a potent mediator of the innate immune response in leukocytes from Salmo salar Kv1.3 potassium channels in human alveolar macrophages Differential voltage-dependent Kþ channel responses during proliferation and activation in macrophages Induction of nitric oxide and respiratory burst response in activated goldfish macrophages requires potassium channel activity The Toll receptor family and microbial recognition Divergent Toll-like receptors in catfish Evolution of interleukin-1beta The immune responses of common carp, Cyprinus carpio L., injected with carp interleukin-1beta gene Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits human lymphocyte interferon gammaproduction by suppressing natural killer cell stimulatory factor/IL-12 synthesis in accessory cells Innate immune response in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against primary and secondary infections with Yersinia ruckeri O1 Catfish Genetics Research Unit) for their excellent sequencing work. We thank Beth Peterman (USDA-ARS) for her excellent technical support. We also thank the management team of the Aquatic Animal Health Research Unit for daily care and management of the fish. This study was supported by the USDA/ARS CRIS project #6420-32000-024-00D. The use of trade, firm, or corporate names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the United States Department of Agriculture or the Agricultural Research Service of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Supplementary material related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2013.08.027.