id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-276110-zztp61pj	Sætra (Sætra is the family name), Henrik Skaug	A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence: Examining the political harms of algorithmic governance in the domain of government	2020-06-08		.txt	text/plain	10940	545	55	These are objections based on the ideas of 'political man' and participation as a prerequisite for legitimacy, the non-morality of machines and the value of transparency and accountability. Such a technocracy, if the AI capabilities of policy formation here assumed becomes reality, may, in theory, provide us with better means of participation, fair and impartial political outcomes, and more efficient government resulting in benefits for most individuals and society in general. They are: a) people might need politics, b) legitimacy is linked to democracy, c) AI is not capable of morality, d) we have an issue with transparency related to AI and e) AI decision-making involves problems assigning responsibility. If politics is really about deciding which moral values are important, and what we see as the good society, having a policy process whereby human beings take part in the formulation of these issues is compatible with a technocracy.	./cache/cord-276110-zztp61pj.txt	./txt/cord-276110-zztp61pj.txt