key: cord-286957-qmh35xyy authors: Aziz, Muhammad; Goyal, Hemant; Haghbin, Hossein; Lee-Smith, Wade M.; Gajendran, Mahesh; Perisetti, Abhilash title: The Association of “Loss of Smell” to COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis date: 2020-11-01 journal: Am J Med Sci DOI: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.09.017 sha: doc_id: 286957 cord_uid: qmh35xyy BACKGROUND: The presence of olfactory dysfunction or “loss of smell” has been reported as an atypical symptom in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to evaluate the prevalence of “loss of smell” in COVID-19 as well as its utility for prognosticating the disease severity. METHODS: An exhaustive search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LitCovid NIH, and WHO COVID-19 database was conducted through August 6(th), 2020. All studies reporting the prevalence of “loss of smell” (anosmia and/or hyposmia/microsmia) in laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients were included. Pooled prevalence for cases (positive COVID-19 through reverse transcriptase (RT-PCR) and/or serology IgG/IgM) and controls (negative RT-PCR and/or serology) was compared, and the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and the p-value were calculated. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 51 studies with 11074 confirmed COVID-19 patients were included. Of these, 21 studies used a control group with 3425 patients. The symptom of “loss of smell” (OR: 14.7, CI: 8.9–24.3) was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group when compared to the control group. Seven studies comparing severe COVID-19 patients with- and without “loss of smell” demonstrated favorable prognosis for patients with “loss of smell” (OR: 0.36, CI 0.27–0.48). CONCLUSION: Olfactory dysfunction or “loss of smell” is a prevalent symptom in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, COVID-19 patients with “loss of smell” appear to have a milder course of the disease. The pandemic coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). 1 The pandemic has resulted in significant economic and healthcare burden. Along with the pulmonary symptoms, the disease is also associated with neurological manifestations such as headache, impaired consciousness, altered gait/ataxia, seizures, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, loss of smell, and altered taste/dysgeusia. 2, 3, 4 The disease severity is associated with laboratory abnormalities such as low albumin, elevated interleukin 6, increased alanine/aspartate aminotransferase, increased total bilirubin, increased procalcitonin, increased C-reactive protein (CRP), etc. Error! Bookmark not defined., 5, 6, 7, 8 The "loss of smell" is an atypical symptom of COVID-19 and has been reported with varying prevalence in literature. Further, it has been observed that loss of smell is usually associated with milder form of disease compared to severe disease. Error! Bookmark not defined. We performed a systematic review and metaanalysis of available studies to evaluate the prevalence of "loss of smell" in COVID-19 and its utility as a prognostic indicator. A systematic search of the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LitCovid NIH, and WHO COVID-19 databases through August 6 th , 2020, was conducted. The author (W.L.S.) created the initial search strategy using the vocabulary for "COVID-19" and "smell," which was cross-checked by another reviewer (M.A.). We highlight an example search strategy using EMBASE in Supplementary table 1. Two independent reviewers (M.A. and H.H.) performed the initial screening and data extraction from the articles. Any discrepancy in article screening or data extraction was resolved through mutual discussion. Only articles reporting the laboratory confirmed COVID-19 patients and "loss of smell" were included. Articles were excluded if they had <10 cases of interest. Articles with suspected cases of COVID-19 without a definitive laboratory diagnosis were also excluded. An adherence to "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) guidelines was observed. Severe disease is defined as the presence of either respiratory distress (i.e., rate >30/min, PaO2/FiO2 <300, and/or SpO2 <93%), need for hospitalization, and/or death. Given the heterogeneity in defining the "loss of smell" across studies, we included the concepts of "anosmia (complete loss of smell)" and "hyposmia/microsmia (diminished or partial loss of smell)" collectively as "loss of smell". Positive COVID-19 cases are defined as patients with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 (through reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and/or serological evidence of COVID-19 through IgG/IgM). Controls are defined as patients with negative RT-PCR and/or serological testing. The pooled prevalence of cases (COVID-19) and controls (non-COVID-19) were compared using the DerSimonian-Laird/Random-effect meta-analysis, and outcomes were reported using forest plots, proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI), odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI, p-value (<0.05 was considered statistically significant) and I 2 heterogeneity (>50% considered substantial heterogeneity). 9, 10, 11 Meta-analysis was conducted using comprehensive meta-analysis (BioStat, Englewood, New Jersey, USA) and Open Meta Analyst (CEBM, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom). Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis. If significant publication bias was suspected, we utilized the "trim-and-fill" method and Fail-Safe N test. The presence of bias in the individual study was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. 12 A total of 51 studies were included based on the search strategy mentioned previously ( Figure 1 ). Publication bias based on prevalence for "loss of smell" was noted based on visual assessment of the funnel plot and Egger's regression analysis (p = 0.01). We then used the "trim-and-fill" method to create adjusted funnel plot that did not significantly differ from the original funnel plot (Supplementary Figure 1) . The Fail-Safe N test was 504 with an alpha of 0.05. This signifies that 504 studies with effect size zero will be needed to nullify the effect noted for the current analysis. Using the QUIPS tool, only seven studies were considered low risk. The other remaining studies either did not account for confounders in their statistical analyses or outcome/prognostic factors were not adequately assessed (Table 1) . A total of 11074 COVID-19 patients (mean age 46.7±10.4 years and males 46.9%) were included in the final analysis (table 1). Error! Bookmark not defined., 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 The overall prevalence of "loss of smell" in COVID-19 patients was 52.0% (CI: 42.5%-61.6%, I 2 =99.4%) ( Figure 2 ). A total of 21 studies compared these symptoms in COVID-19 patients (n=2196) and controls (n=3425). Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined. "Loss of smell" was associated significantly more in the COVID-19 group compared to non-COVID-19 group (OR: 14.7, CI: 8.9-24.3, p<0.001, I 2 =83.2%) (Figure 3 ). Among COVID-19 patients, the odds of patients with severe disease and "loss of smell" were significantly low when compared to patients with severe disease and without "loss of smell" (OR: 0.36, CI 0.27-0.48, p <0.01, I 2 =27.4% (Figure 4 ). Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined., Error! Bookmark not defined. We summarized the overall prevalence of "loss of smell" for COVID-19 patients and compared with control patients i.e. those without laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 from the same study period. The overall prevalence of "loss of smell" was significantly higher for the COVID-19 group compared to control group. In addition, "loss of smell" had a lower association with severe COVID-19 compared to COVID-19 patients without "loss of smell". Olfactory and gustatory changes are one of the most underreported symptoms in COVID-19 and can sometimes be only presenting symptoms in these patients. Error! Bookmark not defined. As demonstrated in our study, "loss of smell" was associated with somewhat favorable prognosis of the disease and hence careful screening should be undertaken to identify potential patients with COVID-19. These patients should undergo testing to rule out COVID-19. This will help in preventing the spread of the virus We noted significant variations in the reporting of symptoms (i.e., dysosmia/anosmia/hyposmia/microsmia) in the studies. Mao Only 7 studies compared the disease severity in patients with "loss of smell" versus those without "loss of smell". Although our results are limited due to the very small sample size, "loss of smell" was characterized by the less severe disease compared to those without this symptom. This finding is noteworthy and needs to be further explored in more extensive studies. The limitation of our analysis is the observational nature of the studies with significant variations in the reporting of symptoms and follow-up. A temporospatial association of the disease severity and the symptom was not possible. However, our study is novel as we performed a pooled analysis combining the statistical power and further compared and demonstrated the prevalence in the control group. In conclusion, we demonstrate here that alteration in smell is prevalent in COVID-19 and should be included as one of the essential symptoms to screen the population. Further larger studies are urgently needed to evaluate the utility of olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19, as demonstrated in our study. Therefore, alteration in the sense of smell should be added as a screening question to identify not only the symptomatic disease but also possible healthy (or presumed asymptomatic) carriers of the disease. World Health Organization, World Health Organization, www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-directorgeneral-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid Neurologic Manifestations of Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease Taste Changes (Dysgeusia) in COVID-19: A systematic review and metaanalysis Gastrointestinal predictors of severe COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis Laboratory abnormalities in patients with COVID-2019 infection Procalcitonin in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A metaanalysis Elevated interleukin-6 and severe COVID-19: A meta-analysis The association of low serum albumin level with severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited A Basic Introduction to Fixed-Effect and Random-Effects Models for Meta-Analysis Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors Acute-onset smell and taste disorders in the context of Covid-19: a pilot multicenter PCR-based case-control study Loss of Taste and Smell as Distinguishing Symptoms of COVID-19 Self-reported Olfactory and Taste Disorders in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Study Features of anosmia in COVID-19 Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study Smell Dysfunction: A Biomarker for COVID-19 Strong associations and moderate predictive value of early symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 test positivity among healthcare workers, the Netherlands Objective evaluation of anosmia and ageusia in COVID-19 patients: Single-center experience on 72 cases Association of chemosensory dysfunction and Covid-19 in patients presenting with influenza-like symptoms Self-reported olfactory loss associates with outpatient clinical course in Covid-19 Taste and Smell Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients Clinical features, laboratory characteristics, and outcomes of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Early report from the United States Olfactory and gustatory abnormalities in COVID-19 cases Smell and taste disorders during COVID-19 outbreak: Cross-sectional study on 355 patients Symptoms and immunoglobulin development in hospital staff exposed to a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak Anosmia and dysgeusia associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an age-matched case-control study Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions in COVID-19. First reports of Latin-American ethnic patients Patterns of smell recovery in 751 patients affected by the COVID-19 outbreak Evolution of Olfactory Disorders in COVID-19 Patients Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: Prevalence and Prognosis for Recovering Sense of Smell COVID-19 experience of the major pandemic response center in the capital: Results of the pandemic's first month in Turkey Predictive Value of Sudden Olfactory Loss in the Diagnosis of COVID-19 Psychophysical tests reveal impaired olfaction but preserved gustation in COVID-19 patients Anosmia in COVID-19 patients Smell and taste dysfunctions in COVID-19 are associated with younger age in ambulatory settings -a multicenter crosssectional study Frequency and outcome of olfactory impairment and sinonasal involvement in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 Acute olfactory loss is specific for Covid-19 at the Emergency Department Loss of Smell and Taste Among Healthcare Personnel Screened for Coronavirus Clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with mild COVID-19 Objective olfactory evaluation of selfreported loss of smell in a case series of 86 COVID-19 patients Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of 1420 European patients with mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 Objective Olfactory Findings in Hospitalized Severe COVID-19 Patients Self-reported anosmia and dysgeusia as key symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 Neurosensory dysfunction: A diagnostic marker of early COVID-19 Symptoms in Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 A Cross-Sectional Survey Prospective study in 355 patients with suspected COVID-19 infection. Value of cough, subjective hyposmia, and hypogeusia Prevalence of New Onset Anosmia in COVID-19 Patients: Is The Trend Different Between European and Indian Population? Asymptomatic infection and atypical manifestations of COVID-19: Comparison of viral shedding duration Olfactory and Gustatory Outcomes in COVID-19: A Prospective Evaluation in Nonhospitalized Subjects Smell and taste alterations in COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis of different cohorts Recovery rate and factors associated with smell and taste disruption in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 New-onset anosmia and ageusia in adult patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection Remote psychophysical evaluation of olfactory and gustatory functions in early-stage coronavirus disease 2019 patients: the Bologna experience of 300 cases Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction as an Early Identifier of COVID-19 in Adults and Children: An International Multicenter Study Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry Ear nose throat-related symptoms with a focus on loss of smell and/or taste in COVID-19 patients Taste and Smell Impairment in COVID-19: An AAO-HNS Anosmia Reporting Tool-Based Comparative Study Quantitative evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in hospitalized patients with Coronavirus (COVID-19) Olfactory and gustatory function impairment in COVID-19 patients: Italian objective multicenter-study Clinical features of COVID-19 and influenza: a comparative study on Nord Franche-Comte cluster