key: cord-261771-43075ute authors: Zhu, Zhen; Liu, Qi; Jiang, Xiaobing; Manandhar, Upasana; Luo, Zhongyu; Zheng, Xu; Li, Yuanyuan; Xie, Jun; Zhang, Bo title: The psychological status of people affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in China date: 2020-05-28 journal: J Psychiatr Res DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.05.026 sha: doc_id: 261771 cord_uid: 43075ute OBJECTIVE: An outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan (Hubei, China) in December, 2019. Facing this largescale infectious public health event, everyone is under great psychological pressure. The aim was to investigate the psychological status of people affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in China. METHODS: The online cross-sectional study involving 922 participants (656 medical staff and 266 general population) was conducted in China between February and March, 2020. The psychological status was evaluated using the Symptom Check List 90 Revised (SCL-90). Linear and logistic regression analysis were used to examine the effect in the study. RESULTS: Of the 922 participants, approximately 18.3% had psychological health problems. The score of the SCL-90 was significant higher in medical staff (mean = 1.49) than that in general population (mean = 1.36). In addition, the participants enrolled in March were less likely to have psychological health problems than in February (odds ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.30 to 0.59). Female had a 1.44-fold risk of psychological health problems than male (95% CI = 1.01 to 2.03). CONCLUSIONS: In the study, 18.3% had psychological health problems during the outbreak of COVID-19 epidemic. With the remission of the epidemic, the psychological health status of participants has been improved. Medical staff were likely to have higher SCL-90 scores than general population and female had more psychological problems than male. Our findings can be used to formulate psychological interventions for improving the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 epidemic. Since December 2019, an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei province, China has aroused public concern nationwide (Wu et al., 2009 ). As of March 30, 2020, there were 81518 confirmed cases in China and the morbidity rate was up to 4.05% (National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, 2020) . In order to control the rapid spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Chinese government has taken active and effective measures, including national blockade (Lau et al., 2020) . Up to now, the city in lockdown has lasted for more than two months. With the long-term isolation, it is urgent to explore people's psychological health status in China (Bao et al., 2020) . The epidemic has brought great psychological pressure to everyone, including medical staff and the general population. With the high pressure and pandemic risk, medical staff are at great risk of developing psychological problems (Chen et al., 2020) . As far as we know, the virus is mainly transmitted via virus-laden respiratory droplets. Due to the face-to-face contact and communication with patients in their work, medical staff are at higher risk of COVID-19 infection than the general population. In addition, at the early stage of the outbreak, the shortage of medical supplies and equipment was also aggravating psychological distress among medical staff. With regarding to the general population, people have to stay at home and isolate themselves in society to prevent infection. As a result, long-term isolation brings a series of problems to life and work, including loss of work and life embarrassment. The COVID-19 epidemic is still in progress, and a timely understanding of psychological status among the affected people is an urgent need for society. On 15 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared this disease a global pandemic (WHO, 2020b) . In the world, there were 754948 confirmed cases and 36571 confirmed deaths involving 203 countries, areas or territories with cases (Updated data: 1 April 2020, 02:06 GMT+) (WHO, 2020a) . People all over the world are committed to fighting the COVID-19 pandemic in all aspects. Therefore, it is of great significance to assess psychological health status for medical staff and the general population, which could improve the effect of epidemic control and promote rapid social recovery. In the current study, we conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the psychological status of people affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in China. We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the current psychological status during the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic between February 17 and March 10, 2020, in China. As the Chinese Government recommended the public to isolate themselves at home, subjects were electronically invited to participate in the study. Medical staff were included if they were from the hospitals for treatment of COVID-19 patients. The general population are non-health care workers. After Information on demographic data included data (February and March), residence (Wuhan and non-Wuhan), gender (male and female), age (years), work (medical staff and the general population) and hospital classification (the first-level hospital, the second-level hospital and the third-level hospital) were collected in the study. We used the Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) to assess the psychological health status of the participants. The SCL-90 is a widely used tool to evaluate a broad range of psychopathology symptoms (Liu and Wang, 2014) . A revised Chinese version was introduced in 1984 (Wang, 1984) . It consists of 90 self-reported items with nine subscales namely: somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, anger hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Besides, an additional scale measures disturbance in appetite and sleep. Subjects rate on a five-point scale of severity according to their experience in recent weeks. The Global Severity Index (GSI), the mean score of the scale, is a widely used global index of distress (Ignatyev et al., 2016) . Higher scores indicate more severe psychopathologic symptoms. If the total score of the SCL-90 scale is more than 160 points, it suggests a subject with positive psychological problems (Jin et al., 2010) . Categorical variables for basic characteristics were expressed as a number (%) and continuous variables for the ages of the participants and the SCL-90 scores were shown as the mean and standard deviation (SD). The chi-square test, t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine the distribution differences of the SCL-90 scores in the groups. We also calculated the effect sizes (Cohen's d and η 2 ) to describe the standardized mean difference of an effect. Cohen's d is directly related to a t-test as small (d = 0.2), medium (d = 0.5), large (d = 0.8), and η 2 is widely reported in ANOVA to define small (η 2 = 0.01), medium (η 2 = 0.06), and large (η 2 = 0.14) effects (Lakens, 2013) . To identify the potential risk factors that were associated with psychopathology, all related variables were included in the forward stepwise multiple linear and logistic regression models for analysis. All tests were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistic 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The basic characteristics of our study population are shown in were male. The average ages for medical staff were 37.28 years old (SD = 6.36). Approximately 18.3% of the participants had psychological health problems. Compared with the controls, the subjects with psychological health problems were more enrolled in February and more medical staff. When restricted to medical staff, there were significant differences between the subjects with positive and negative psychological symptoms in hospital classification, survey time and residence. Table 2 To identify the risk factors associated with psychological health status among the participants, multiple linear regression models were applied for analysis (Table 3) . Survey time was significantly associated with the total scores in the SCL-90 scale (β of the participants reported their psychological impact as moderate-to-severe, and approximately 28.8% as moderate-to-severe anxiety . In addition, the psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on medical staff and general population were also observed (Chong et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2009) . Therefore, great attention should be paid to the psychological health problems of the general public during the epidemic. Medical staff were at particularly higher risk of psychological problems than general population. In the stage of the outbreak, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases increased nationwide rapidly. The medical staff was obviously insufficient, which resulted in high workload of medical staff. The medical staff had more psychological pressure than general population in the pandemics and public health emergencies. A number of previous studies had reported that clinical workers who were at high risk of contracting SARS appear to have elevated levels of depression and anxiety (Lim et al., 2018; Brooks et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2012; Cheng et al., 2004; Lu et al., 2006) . In addition, it is suggested that the psychological problems of medical staff in secondary-level hospitals were more serious than those in first-level or third-level hospitals in China. For the first-level hospitals, it generally provides basic medical services, but do not treat for COVID-19 patients, such as community hospitals. For the medical staff that are from the third-level hospital, they are mainly middle-level backbone staff with working experience and psychological capacity. In addition, due to the contact with many diagnosed or suspected patients, they provide with sufficient psychological preparation and will pay more attention to their own safety. However, medical staff that are from the second-level hospitals, including county-level or district-level hospitals, is responsible for the treatment of a large number of patients with COVID-19 infection. The lack of protective equipment and work experience leads to the most serious mental health problems among all medical staff. There are other risk factors for psychological problems, such as gender. In the current study, females suffered greater psychological problems of the outbreak than male. This finding is consistent with previously extensive epidemiological studies. Lim et al. reported that women were at higher risk of depression (Lim et al., 2018) . In addition, female was associated with a greater psychological impact of the outbreak and higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression than male . This study has several limitations. First, we collected information on the basic demographic characteristics of the participants, but we did not investigate related socioeconomic characteristics (such as education and marriage status) and the knowledge and behavior of the epidemic. Some potential factors that may contribute to the risk of psychological health problems were not identified in the analysis. Second, more large-scale cohort studies are needed to investigate the long-term psychological health effect of the epidemic on medical staff and general population. In conclusion, approximately 18.3% of the participants had psychological health problems during the epidemic. With the remission of the epidemic, the psychological health status of participants has been improved. In addition, medical staff were more psychologically distressed than the general population, and female was likely to have more poor psychological health than male. This may assist government agencies and healthcare professionals in safeguarding the psychological status of the medical staff and general population in the face of the COVID-19 outbreak. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802722, 81501888) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2020kfyXGYJ010). None. None. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks -at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---9-march-2020 (accessed 30 March 2020). Wu, P., Fang, Y., Guan, Z., Fan, B., Kong, J., Yao, Z., Liu, X., Fuller, C. J., Susser, E., Lu, J., & Hoven, C. W., 2009 . The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic Table 1 The descriptive characteristics of the participants. Data shown as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation. Table 2 The distribution of SCL-90 scores stratified by different demographic categories (continue). 2019-nCoV epidemic: address mental health care to empower society A systematic, thematic review of social and occupational factors associated with psychological outcomes in healthcare employees during an infectious disease outbreak Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak Psychological distress and negative appraisals in survivors of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) Psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on health workers in a tertiary hospital Psychometric properties of the symptom check-list-90-R in prison inmates The psychological status of HIV-positive people and their psychosocial experiences in eastern China Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs The positive impact of lockdown in Wuhan on containing the COVID-19 outbreak in China Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between The experience of left-behind and mental health of college students from second generation of floating peasants: based on the perspective of reform in floating population system Depression after exposure to stressful events: lessons learned from the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic The mental health of hospital workers dealing with severe acute respiratory syndrome National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China Symptom checklist SCL-90 Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 1. The participant in March have less psychological health problems than in February Medical staff were likely to have higher SCL-90 scores than general population Female was likely to have more psychological health problems than male None.