Argument from religious experience - Wikipedia Argument from religious experience From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search The argument from religious experience is an argument for the existence of God. It holds that the best explanation for religious experiences is that they constitute genuine experience or perception of a divine reality. Various reasons have been offered for and against accepting this contention. Contemporary defenders of the argument are Richard Swinburne, William Alston, Alvin Plantinga, Alister Hardy, and Dinesh D'Souza. Contents 1 Outline 1.1 Suggested reasons for accepting the premise 1.2 Suggested reasons for disputing the premise 2 Alternate formulations 3 See also 4 References 5 Further reading Outline[edit] In essence, the argument's structure is as follows:[citation needed] There are compelling reasons for believing that claims of religious experience point to and validate spiritual realities that exist in a way that transcends material manifestation; According to materialism, nothing exists in a way that transcends material manifestation; According to classical theism, God endows human beings with the ability to perceive – although imperfectly – religious, spiritual and/or transcendent realities through religious, spiritual and/or transcendent experience. To the extent that premise 1 is accepted, therefore, theism is more plausible than materialism. As statements 2 to 4 are generally treated as uncontroversial,[citation needed] discussion has tended to focus on the status of the first. Suggested reasons for accepting the premise[edit] Some principal arguments that have been made in favor of the premise include: Very substantial numbers of ordinary people report having had such experiences, though this isn't to say that religious believers aren't ordinary.[clarification needed][1] Such experiences are reported in almost all known cultures. These experiences often have very significant effects on people's lives, frequently inducing in them acts of extreme self-sacrifice well beyond what could be expected from evolutionary arguments. These experiences often seem very real to the people involved, and are quite often reported as being shared by a number of people.[2] Although mass delusions are not inconceivable, one needs compelling reasons for invoking this as an explanation. Swinburne suggests that, as two basic principles of rationality, we ought to believe that things are as they seem unless and until we have evidence that they are mistaken (principle of credulity), and that those who do not have an experience of a certain type ought to believe others who say that they do in the absence of evidence of deceit or delusion (principle of testimony) and thus, although if you have a strong reason to disbelieve in the existence of God you will discount these experiences, in other cases such evidence should count towards the existence of God.[3] Suggested reasons for disputing the premise[edit] On the other hand, the following reasons have been offered for rejecting the premise: Religious experiences might be mis-firings of evolved mechanisms selected for very different reasons.[4] Some religious experiences are believed to have occurred only on the basis of religious texts such as the Bible, but these texts are of disputable historical accuracy.[5] It is conceivable that some claimed religious experiences are lies, possibly done for attention or acceptance.[5] Argument from inconsistent revelations: Different people have had, or believed to have had, religious experiences pointing to the truth of different religions. Not all of these can be correct. Kraemer highlighted a link between arguments of religious experience and self-righteousness (perception of superiority over those who do not receive providence).[6] In Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion, New Atheist author Sam Harris assigns great value to religious experiences, but denies that facts about the cosmos can rationally be inferred from them, highlighting how different religions would give incompatible interpretations of the experiences.[7] A Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article by Mark Webb suggests two responses to the argument: postulate a common core to the experiences that is then described with different details, or accept the experiences of one's own tradition as accurate while rejecting those of others as inaccurate.[8] It has been argued that religious experiences are little more than[clarification needed] hallucinations aimed at fulfilling basic psychological desires of immortality, purpose, etc. Sigmund Freud, for example, considered God to be simply a psychological "illusion"[9] created by the mind, instead of an actual existing entity. This argument can be based upon the fact that since we know about some believers for whom this argument is correct (their reports for religious experiences are nothing more than illusions), we assume that perhaps all such reports may be illusions. Alternate formulations[edit] American analytic philosophers Alvin Plantinga and William Alston developed arguments for accepting knowledge gained from religious experience based on drawing analogies with knowledge gained from sense experience.[8] In both cases they apply their arguments to Christian religious experiences, but accept that they may equally apply to other religious experiences.[8] Plantinga argues that just as the knowledge gained from sense experience is regarded as properly basic despite being unsupported based on foundationalism in the mould of Descartes, religious experiences should be accepted as providing properly basic knowledge of God.[8] Alston argues that if sets of practices used to form beliefs produce conclusions that are coherent over time both internally and with other belief-forming practices, they should be accepted. He argues this is the only way our ordinary beliefs are justified, and that by the same criteria belief based on Christian religious experience is justified.[8] See also[edit] Rational mysticism The Varieties of Religious Experience by William James Rudolf Otto References[edit] ^ Polkinghorne, Belief in God in an Age of Science "the surveys conducted by the distinguished biologist Alister Hardy" Swinburne references David Hay Religious Experience Today (1990) chapters 5, 6 and Appendix ^ For example the New Testament speaks of Jesus, after his resurrection, appearing to 10 or more people at once (see e.g. 1 Corinthians 15:6, Luke 24, Mt 28, Jn 16, Acts 1). ^ Swinburne, Is there a God? pp. 133–136 ^ This is broadly Dawkins' line in The God Delusion ^ a b Walker, Cliff. "Is The Bible Historically Accurate?". Positive Atheism. Archived from the original on 13 June 2010. Retrieved 11 May 2010. ^ Kraemer, Hendrik (2009). The Christian Message in a Non-Christian World. Centre for Contemporary Christianity. p. 107. ISBN 8190869108. ^ Smith, Holly (17 September 2014). "Waking Up: A Guide to Spirituality Without Religion". Washington Independent Review of Books. Retrieved 28 January 2019. ^ a b c d e Webb, Mark (2017). "Religious experience". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 13 January 2018. ^ Freud, Sigmund, The Future of an Illusion, W. W. Norton & Company, ISBN 0-393-00831-2 Further reading[edit] William Alston, Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience, Cornell University Press: 1991 ( ISBN 978-0-8014-8155-0) Ian Barbour, Religion and Science, SCM: 1998 ( ISBN 0-334-02721-7). Caroline Franks Davis, The Evidential Force of Religious Experience, OUP: 2004 ( ISBN 0-19-825001-0). Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion, Bantam Book: 2006 ( ISBN 0-618-68000-4) (although not identified explicitly, the argument from religious experience is dismissed). Joseph Hinman, The Trace of God: A Rational Warrant for Belief ( ISBN 978-0-9824087-3-5). William James, The Varieties of Religious Experience, OUP: 2012 [1902] ( ISBN 978-0199691647). Kai-man Kwan, "The Argument from Religious Experience" in The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. John Polkinghorne, The Faith of a Physicist, Fortress Press: 1996 ( ISBN 978-0800629700), and Belief in God in an Age of Science, YUP: 1998 ( ISBN 9780300072945). Richard Swinburne, The Existence of God, OUP: 2004 (2nd edition) ( ISBN 0-19-927168-2) and Is there a God?, OUP: 1996 ( ISBN 0-19-823545-3). Tom Wright, Simply Christian, Harper Collins: 2010 ( ISBN 9780061920622) (esp. Chapter 2, "The hidden spring"). Yandell, Ketih E. (1994), The Epistemology of Religious Experience, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-47741-3 v t e Arguments for and against the existence of God For Beauty Christological Trilemma Resurrection Consciousness Cosmological Kalam cosmological Contingency Cosmological argument#Metaphysical argument for the existence of God Degree Intelligent Design Ontogenetic depth Desire Experience Existential choice Fine-tuned universe Knowledge Love Miracles Morality Natural-law Necessary extent Seddiqin Nyayakusumanjali Ontological Anselm Gödel Modal Mulla Sudra Pascal's Wager Reason Reformed Teleological Junkyard Natural law Watchmaker Transcendental Trademark Against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Creator of God Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's Razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot v t e Philosophy of religion Concepts in religion Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Problem of evil Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto Conceptions of God Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Misotheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme Being Unmoved mover God in Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Mormonism Sikhism Baháʼí Faith Wicca Existence of God For Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological Kalam Contingency Degree Desire Experience Fine-tuning of the universe Love Miracles Morality Necessary existent Ontological Pascal's wager Proper basis Reason Teleological Natural law Watchmaker analogy Transcendental Against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot Theology Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Creationism Dharmism Deism Demonology Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism Christian Agnostic Atheistic Feminist theology Thealogy Womanist theology Fideism Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism Religious Secular Christian Inclusivism Theories about religions Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism Metaphysical Religious Humanistic New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Panentheism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Possibilianism Process theology Religious skepticism Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism more... Religious language Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism Problem of evil Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy Philosophers of religion (by date active) Ancient and medieval Anselm of Canterbury Augustine of Hippo Avicenna Averroes Boethius Erasmus Gaunilo of Marmoutiers Pico della Mirandola Heraclitus King James VI and I Marcion of Sinope Thomas Aquinas Maimonides Early modern Augustin Calmet René Descartes Blaise Pascal Baruch Spinoza Nicolas Malebranche Gottfried W Leibniz William Wollaston Thomas Chubb David Hume Baron d'Holbach Immanuel Kant Johann G Herder 1800 1850 Friedrich Schleiermacher Karl C F Krause Georg W F Hegel William Whewell Ludwig Feuerbach Søren Kierkegaard Karl Marx Albrecht Ritschl Afrikan Spir 1880 1900 Ernst Haeckel W K Clifford Friedrich Nietzsche Harald Høffding William James Vladimir Solovyov Ernst Troeltsch Rudolf Otto Lev Shestov Sergei Bulgakov Pavel Florensky Ernst Cassirer Joseph Maréchal 1920 postwar George Santayana Bertrand Russell Martin Buber René Guénon Paul Tillich Karl Barth Emil Brunner Rudolf Bultmann Gabriel Marcel Reinhold Niebuhr Charles Hartshorne Mircea Eliade Frithjof Schuon J L Mackie Walter Kaufmann Martin Lings Peter Geach George I Mavrodes William Alston Antony Flew 1970 1990 2010 William L Rowe Dewi Z Phillips Alvin Plantinga Anthony Kenny Nicholas Wolterstorff Richard Swinburne Robert Merrihew Adams Ravi Zacharias Peter van Inwagen Daniel Dennett Loyal Rue Jean-Luc Marion William Lane Craig Ali Akbar Rashad Alexander Pruss Related topics Criticism of religion Desacralization of knowledge Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religion Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Faith and rationality more... Portal Category v t e Theology Conceptions of God Theism Forms Deism Dystheism Henotheism Hermeticism Kathenotheism Nontheism Monolatry Monotheism Mysticism Panentheism Pandeism Pantheism Polydeism Polytheism Spiritualism Theistic finitism Theopanism Concepts Deity Divinity Gender of God and gods Male deity Goddess Numen Singular god theologies By faith Abrahamic religions Baháʼí Faith Judaism Christianity Catholic Islam Buddhism Hinduism Jainism Sikhism Zoroastrianism Concepts Absolute Brahman Emanationism Logos Supreme Being God as the Devil Sustainer Time Trinitarianism Athanasian Creed Comma Johanneum Consubstantiality Homoousian Homoiousian Hypostasis Perichoresis Shield of the Trinity Trinitarian formula Trinity Trinity of the Church Fathers Trinitarian universalism Eschatology Afterlife Apocalypticism Buddhist Christian Heaven Hell Hindu Islamic Jewish Taoist Zoroastrian Feminist Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Judaism Mormonism Goddesses Other concepts The All Aristotelian view Attributes of God in Christianity / in Islam Binitarianism Demiurge Divine simplicity Divine presence Egotheism Exotheology Holocaust Godhead in Christianity Latter Day Saints Great Architect of the Universe Great Spirit Apophatic theology Olelbis Open theism Personal god Phenomenological definition Philo's view Process Tian Unmoved mover Names of God in Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism By faith Christian History Outline Biblical canon Glossary Paterology Christology Pneumatology Cosmology Ecclesiology Ethics Hamartiology Messianism Philosophy Practical Sophiology Soteriology Hindu Ayyavazhi theology Krishnology Islamic Oneness of God Prophets Holy Scriptures Angels Predestination Last Judgment Jewish Abrahamic prophecy Aggadah Denominations Kabbalah Philosophy Religion portal Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Argument_from_religious_experience&oldid=985685668" Categories: Arguments for the existence of God Subjective experience Philosophy of religion Hidden categories: Use dmy dates from June 2020 All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from November 2014 Wikipedia articles needing clarification from January 2019 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية Euskara فارسی Bahasa Indonesia Edit links This page was last edited on 27 October 2020, at 10:18 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement