Peter van Inwagen - Wikipedia Peter van Inwagen From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search American philosopher Peter van Inwagen Born (1942-09-21) September 21, 1942 (age 78) Alma mater Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute University of Rochester Era 20th-/21st-century philosophy Region Western philosophy School Analytic philosophy Doctoral advisor Richard Taylor Main interests Metaphysics Philosophy of religion Philosophy of action Notable ideas Incompatibilism Consequence argument[1] Meta-ontology Mind argument Influences Alvin Plantinga Peter van Inwagen (/væn ɪnˈwɑːɡən/; born September 21, 1942) is an American analytic philosopher and the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame. He is also a Research Professor of Philosophy at Duke University each Spring.[2] He previously taught at Syracuse University and earned his PhD from the University of Rochester in 1969[3] under the direction of Richard Taylor.[4] Van Inwagen is one of the leading figures in contemporary metaphysics, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of action. He was the president of the Society of Christian Philosophers from 2010 to 2013.[5] Contents 1 Career 2 Awards and honors 3 Books 4 Personal life 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References 8 Works cited 9 Sources 10 External links Career[edit] Van Inwagen's 1983 monograph An Essay on Free Will[6] played an important role in rehabilitating libertarianism with respect to free will in mainstream analytical philosophy.[7] In the book, he introduces the term incompatibilism about free will and determinism, to stand in contrast to compatibilism—the view that free will is compatible with determinism.[note 1] Van Inwagen's central argument (the consequence argument) for this view is that "If determinism is true, then our acts are the consequences of the laws of nature and events in the remote past. But it is not up to us what went on before we were born, and neither is it up to us what the laws of nature are. Therefore, the consequences of those things (including our present acts) are not up to us."[9] Van Inwagen also added what he called the Mind Argument (after the philosophical journal Mind, where such arguments often appeared). "The Mind argument proceeds by identifying indeterminism with chance and by arguing that an act that occurs by chance, if an event that occurs by chance can be called an act, cannot be under the control of its alleged agent and hence cannot have been performed freely. Proponents of [this argument] conclude, therefore, that free will is not only compatible with determinism but entails determinism."[10] The Consequence Argument and the Mind Argument are the two horns in the classic dilemma and standard argument against free will.[citation needed] If determinism is true, our actions are not free. If indeterminism is true, our actions are random and our will can not be morally responsible for them.[11] Van Inwagen concludes that "Free Will Remains a Mystery."[12] In an article written in the third person called "Van Inwagen on Free Will,"[13] he describes the problem with his incompatibilist free will if random chance directly causes our actions.[14] He imagines the universe reverting a thousand times to exactly the same circumstances[15] it was in at some earlier time and observing all the "replays." If the agent's actions are random, she sometimes "would have agent-caused the crucial brain event and sometimes (in seventy percent of the replays, let us say) she would not have... I conclude that even if an episode of agent causation is among the causal antecedents of every voluntary human action, these episodes do nothing to undermine the prima facie impossibility of an undetermined free act."[16] In a paper submitted to The Journal of Ethics, "How to Think about the Problem of Free Will", Van Inwagen worries that the concept "free will" may be incoherent. He writes, "There are seemingly unanswerable arguments that (if they are indeed unanswerable) demonstrate that free will is incompatible with determinism. And there are seemingly unanswerable arguments that ... demonstrate that free will is incompatible with indeterminism. But if free will is incompatible both with determinism and indeterminism, the concept 'free will' is incoherent, and the thing free will does not exist."[17] In his book Material Beings,[18] Van Inwagen argues that all material objects are either elementary particles or living organisms. Every composite material object is made up of elementary particles, and the only such composite objects are living organisms. A consequence of this view is that everyday objects such as tables, chairs, cars, buildings, and clouds do not exist. While there seem to be such things, this is only because there are elementary particles arranged in specific ways. For example, where it seems that there is a chair, Van Inwagen says that there are only elementary particles arranged chairwise. These particles do not compose an object, any more than a swarm of bees composes an object. Like a swarm of bees, the particles we call a chair maintain a more or less stable arrangement for a while, which gives the impression of a single object. An individual bee, by contrast, has parts that are unified in the right way to constitute a single object (namely, a bee). Van Inwagen gave the 2003 Gifford Lectures; they are published in his The Problem of Evil.[19] There Van Inwagen argues that the problem of evil is a philosophical argument and, like most philosophical arguments, fails. In recent years, Van Inwagen has shown an interest in the afterlife debate, particularly in relation to resurrection of the body. In his unpublished article "I Look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the Life of the World to Come", he concludes that Christians must account for some sort of physical continuity in their account of existence of the same person after death. In particular, Van Inwagen notes, this is a problem for the Christian materialist, one who believes that human beings are physical substances. Awards and honors[edit] He was elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2005,[20] and was President of the Central Division of the American Philosophical Association in 2008/09. He was the President of the Society of Christian Philosophers from 2010 to 2013.[5] He has delivered lectures including: The F.D. Maurice Lectures, three lectures delivered at the University of London in March 1999 The Wilde Lectures on Natural Religion, eight lectures delivered at Oxford University in Trinity Term, 2000 The Stewart Lectures: three lectures delivered at Princeton University, October 2002 The Gifford Lectures, eight lectures delivered at the University of St. Andrews, May 2003 The Jellema Lectures: two lectures delivered at Calvin College, March 2004 The Münster Lectures in Philosophy, including a student colloquium at the University of Münster, November 2015 In May 2011 it was announced that he is to receive an honorary doctorate from the University of St Andrews, Scotland.[21] Books[edit] Thinking about Free Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2017. ISBN 978-1-107-16650-9. Existence: Essays in Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2014. ISBN 978-1-107-62526-6. The Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006. ISBN 978-0-19-924560-4. Ontology, Identity, and Modality: Essays in Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002. ISBN 978-0-521-79164-9. The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1998. ISBN 978-0-8133-2731-0. God, Knowledge and Mystery: Essays in Philosophical Theology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1995. ISBN 978-0-8014-8186-4. Metaphysics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 2002. ISBN 978-0-8133-9055-0. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1990. ISBN 978-0-8014-8306-6. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1983. ISBN 978-0-19-824924-5. Personal life[edit] Van Inwagen lives in Granger, Indiana, with his wife Elisabeth. Van Inwagen converted to Christianity in 1980.[citation needed] See also[edit] Mereological nihilism American philosophy List of American philosophers Notes[edit] ^ Indeed, some philosophers suggest free will must be compatible with determinism, otherwise we could not be responsible for our actions.[8] References[edit] ^ Vihvelin, Kadri (September 18, 2017). "Arguments for Incompatibilism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved April 13, 2020. ^ "Faculty | Department of Philosophy". Archived from the original on March 5, 2015. Retrieved July 2, 2015. ^ "Prof. Peter van Inwagen". faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk. Archived from the original on October 3, 2015. Retrieved October 3, 2015. ^ Holmes, Steve (August 18, 2014). "Peter van Inwagen". The Gifford Lectures. Retrieved November 17, 2017. ^ a b "SCP Officers and Committees". Society of Christian Philosophers. Archived from the original on August 2, 2012. Retrieved October 3, 2015. ^ van Inwagen 1983. ^ Kane 2005, p. 23. ^ HOBART, R. E. (1934). "I.—Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It". Mind. XLIII (169): 1–27. doi:10.1093/mind/XLIII.169.1. ^ Essay, v ^ Essay, 16 ^ Smart, J. J. C. (1961). "Free-Will, Praise and Blame". Mind. 70 (279): 291–306. doi:10.1093/mind/LXX.279.291. ISSN 0026-4423. JSTOR 2251619. ^ van Inwagen 2000, p. 14. ^ van Inwagen 2004, Chapter 10. ^ "Chance NOT the Direct Cause of Human Action". Information Philosopher. Retrieved April 13, 2020. ^ "Exactly The Same Circumstances". Informationphilosopher.com. Retrieved November 17, 2017. ^ van Inwagen 2017, p. 227. ^ Peter van Inwagen (2008). "How to think about the problem of free will" (PDF). The Journal of Ethics. 12 (3–4): 327–341. doi:10.1007/s10892-008-9038-7. S2CID 144635471. ^ (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995) ^ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) ^ Dame, Marketing Communications: Web // University of Notre. "Philosopher elected to American Academy of Arts and Sciences". Notre Dame News. Retrieved April 13, 2020. ^ Cook, Gayle (May 20, 2011). "St Andrews to honour David Attenborough". St Andrews. Retrieved April 13, 2020. Works cited[edit] Kane, Robert (2005). A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-514970-8. Retrieved April 13, 2020. van Inwagen, Peter (1983). An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-824924-5. van Inwagen, Peter (2000). "Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture". Philosophical Perspectives. Ridgeview Publishing Company. 14. Retrieved April 13, 2020. van Inwagen, Peter (2004). Campbell, Joseph Keim; O'Rourke, Michael; Shier, David (eds.). Freedom and Determinism. MIT Press. pp. 213–230. ISBN 978-0-262-53257-0. Retrieved April 13, 2020. van Inwagen, Peter (2017). Thinking about Free Will. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-16650-9. Retrieved April 13, 2020. Sources[edit] Zimmerman, Dean (2009). Sosa, Ernest; Rosenkrantz, Gary; Kim, Jaegwon (eds.). A Companion to Metaphysics (2nd ed.). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. pp. 619–621. External links[edit] Official Page at the University of Notre Dame The Problem of Evil, Oxford University Press, 2006. (Gifford Lectures 2002) Papers by van Inwagen Van Inwagen (Brief professional overview) Argument Against Free Will "Metaphysics" (Entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Interviews from the PBS program Closer to Truth Works by or about Peter van Inwagen in libraries (WorldCat catalog) v t e Analytic philosophy Related articles Areas of focus Epistemology Language Mathematics Science Turns Aretaic Linguistic Logic Classical Mathematical Non-classical Philosophical Theories Anti-realism Australian realism Descriptivist theory of names Emotivism Functionalism Analytical feminism Logical atomism Logical positivism Analytical Marxism Neopragmatism Neurophilosophy Ordinary language Quietism Scientific structuralism Sense data Concepts Analysis (paradox of analysis) Analytic–synthetic distinction Counterfactual Natural kind Reflective equilibrium Supervenience Modality Actualism Necessity Possibility Possible world Realism Rigid designator Philosophers Noam Chomsky Keith Donnellan Paul Feyerabend Gottlob Frege Ian Hacking Karl Popper Ernest Sosa Barry Stroud Michael Walzer Cambridge Charlie Broad Norman Malcolm G. E. Moore Graham Priest Bertrand Russell Frank P. Ramsey Ludwig Wittgenstein Oxford G. E. M. Anscombe J. L. Austin A. J. Ayer Michael Dummett Antony Flew Philippa Foot Peter Geach Paul Grice R. M. Hare Alasdair MacIntyre Derek Parfit Gilbert Ryle John Searle P. F. Strawson Richard Swinburne Charles Taylor Bernard Williams Timothy Williamson Logical positivists Ernest Nagel Berlin Circle Carl Gustav Hempel Hans Reichenbach Vienna Circle Rudolf Carnap Kurt Gödel Otto Neurath Moritz Schlick Harvard Roderick Chisholm Donald Davidson Daniel Dennett Nelson Goodman Christine Korsgaard Thomas Kuhn Thomas Nagel Robert Nozick Hilary Putnam W. V. O. Quine John Rawls Pittsburgh School Robert Brandom Patricia Churchland Paul Churchland Adolf Grünbaum John McDowell Ruth Millikan Nicholas Rescher Wilfrid Sellars Bas van Fraassen Princeton Jerry Fodor David Lewis Jaegwon Kim Saul Kripke Richard Rorty Notre Dame Robert Audi Peter van Inwagen Alvin Plantinga Australian David Chalmers J. L. Mackie Peter Singer J. J. C. Smart Quietism James F. Conant Alice Crary Cora Diamond Category Index v t e Metaphysics Metaphysicians Parmenides Plato Aristotle Plotinus Duns Scotus Thomas Aquinas Francisco Suárez Nicolas Malebranche René Descartes John Locke David Hume Thomas Reid Immanuel Kant Isaac Newton Arthur Schopenhauer Baruch Spinoza Georg W. F. Hegel George Berkeley Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Christian Wolff Bernard Bolzano Hermann Lotze Henri Bergson Friedrich Nietzsche Charles Sanders Peirce Joseph Maréchal Ludwig Wittgenstein Martin Heidegger Alfred N. Whitehead Bertrand Russell G. E. Moore Jean-Paul Sartre Gilbert Ryle Hilary Putnam P. F. Strawson R. G. Collingwood Rudolf Carnap Saul Kripke W. V. O. Quine G. E. M. Anscombe Donald Davidson Michael Dummett D. M. Armstrong David Lewis Alvin Plantinga Héctor-Neri Castañeda Peter van Inwagen Derek Parfit Alexius Meinong Ernst Mally Edward N. Zalta more ... Theories Abstract object theory Action theory Anti-realism Determinism Dualism Enactivism Essentialism Existentialism Free will Idealism Libertarianism Liberty Materialism Meaning of life Monism Naturalism Nihilism Phenomenalism Realism Physicalism Platonic idealism Relativism Scientific realism Solipsism Subjectivism Substance theory Truthmaker theory Type theory Concepts Abstract object Anima mundi Being Category of being Causality Causal closure Choice Cogito, ergo sum Concept Embodied cognition Essence Existence Experience Hypostatic abstraction Idea Identity Information Insight Intelligence Intention Linguistic modality Matter Meaning Memetics Mental representation Mind Motion Nature Necessity Notion Object Pattern Perception Physical object Principle Property Qualia Quality Reality Relation Soul Subject Substantial form Thought Time Truth Type–token distinction Universal Unobservable Value more ... Related topics Axiology Cosmology Epistemology Feminist metaphysics Interpretations of quantum mechanics Mereology Meta- Ontology Philosophy of mind Philosophy of psychology Philosophy of self Philosophy of space and time Teleology Theoretical physics Category  Philosophy portal v t e Philosophy of religion Concepts in religion Afterlife Euthyphro dilemma Faith Intelligent design Miracle Problem of evil Religious belief Soul Spirit Theodicy Theological veto Conceptions of God Aristotelian view Brahman Demiurge Divine simplicity Egoism Holy Spirit Misotheism Pandeism Personal god Process theology Supreme Being Unmoved mover God in Abrahamic religions Buddhism Christianity Hinduism Islam Jainism Judaism Mormonism Sikhism Baháʼí Faith Wicca Existence of God For Beauty Christological Consciousness Cosmological Kalam Contingency Degree Desire Experience Fine-tuning of the universe Love Miracles Morality Necessary existent Ontological Pascal's wager Proper basis Reason Teleological Natural law Watchmaker analogy Transcendental Against 747 gambit Atheist's Wager Evil Free will Hell Inconsistent revelations Nonbelief Noncognitivism Occam's razor Omnipotence Poor design Russell's teapot Theology Acosmism Agnosticism Animism Antireligion Atheism Creationism Dharmism Deism Demonology Divine command theory Dualism Esotericism Exclusivism Existentialism Christian Agnostic Atheistic Feminist theology Thealogy Womanist theology Fideism Fundamentalism Gnosticism Henotheism Humanism Religious Secular Christian Inclusivism Theories about religions Monism Monotheism Mysticism Naturalism Metaphysical Religious Humanistic New Age Nondualism Nontheism Pandeism Panentheism Pantheism Perennialism Polytheism Possibilianism Process theology Religious skepticism Spiritualism Shamanism Taoic Theism Transcendentalism more... Religious language Eschatological verification Language game Logical positivism Apophatic theology Verificationism Problem of evil Augustinian theodicy Best of all possible worlds Euthyphro dilemma Inconsistent triad Irenaean theodicy Natural evil Theodicy Philosophers of religion (by date active) Ancient and medieval Anselm of Canterbury Augustine of Hippo Avicenna Averroes Boethius Erasmus Gaunilo of Marmoutiers Pico della Mirandola Heraclitus King James VI and I Marcion of Sinope Thomas Aquinas Maimonides Early modern Augustin Calmet René Descartes Blaise Pascal Baruch Spinoza Nicolas Malebranche Gottfried W Leibniz William Wollaston Thomas Chubb David Hume Baron d'Holbach Immanuel Kant Johann G Herder 1800 1850 Friedrich Schleiermacher Karl C F Krause Georg W F Hegel William Whewell Ludwig Feuerbach Søren Kierkegaard Karl Marx Albrecht Ritschl Afrikan Spir 1880 1900 Ernst Haeckel W K Clifford Friedrich Nietzsche Harald Høffding William James Vladimir Solovyov Ernst Troeltsch Rudolf Otto Lev Shestov Sergei Bulgakov Pavel Florensky Ernst Cassirer Joseph Maréchal 1920 postwar George Santayana Bertrand Russell Martin Buber René Guénon Paul Tillich Karl Barth Emil Brunner Rudolf Bultmann Gabriel Marcel Reinhold Niebuhr Charles Hartshorne Mircea Eliade Frithjof Schuon J L Mackie Walter Kaufmann Martin Lings Peter Geach George I Mavrodes William Alston Antony Flew 1970 1990 2010 William L Rowe Dewi Z Phillips Alvin Plantinga Anthony Kenny Nicholas Wolterstorff Richard Swinburne Robert Merrihew Adams Ravi Zacharias Peter van Inwagen Daniel Dennett Loyal Rue Jean-Luc Marion William Lane Craig Ali Akbar Rashad Alexander Pruss Related topics Criticism of religion Desacralization of knowledge Ethics in religion Exegesis History of religion Religion Religious language Religious philosophy Relationship between religion and science Faith and rationality more... Portal Category Authority control BIBSYS: 90819793 BNF: cb11887783g (data) CANTIC: a11495467 GND: 13344516X ISNI: 0000 0001 1673 4752 LCCN: n79151632 LNB: 000101246 NKC: uk2007349618 NTA: 069801789 PLWABN: 9810629255005606 SELIBR: 98955 SUDOC: 026673789 VIAF: 75042238 WorldCat Identities: lccn-n79151632 Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_van_Inwagen&oldid=998934313" Categories: 1942 births 20th-century American philosophers 20th-century theologians 21st-century American philosophers 21st-century theologians Action theorists American Episcopalians Analytic philosophers Anglican philosophers Critics of atheism Duke University faculty Living people Metaphysicians Moral philosophers Ontologists People from Granger, Indiana Philosophers of religion Presidents of the American Philosophical Association Presidents of the Society of Christian Philosophers Syracuse University faculty University of Notre Dame faculty University of Rochester alumni Hidden categories: Use mdy dates from April 2020 Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata Articles with hCards All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from April 2020 Wikipedia articles with BIBSYS identifiers Wikipedia articles with BNF identifiers Wikipedia articles with CANTIC identifiers Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers Wikipedia articles with ISNI identifiers Wikipedia articles with LCCN identifiers Wikipedia articles with LNB identifiers Wikipedia articles with NKC identifiers Wikipedia articles with NTA identifiers Wikipedia articles with PLWABN identifiers Wikipedia articles with SELIBR identifiers Wikipedia articles with SUDOC identifiers Wikipedia articles with VIAF identifiers Wikipedia articles with WORLDCATID identifiers Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages Dansk Deutsch Eesti Español فارسی Français مصرى Polski Português Suomi Edit links This page was last edited on 7 January 2021, at 18:27 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement