id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
en-wikipedia-org-1616		Argument from free will - Wikipedia			.html	text/html	2872	706	54	The argument from free will, also called the paradox of free will or theological fatalism, contends that omniscience and free will are incompatible and that any conception of God that incorporates both properties is therefore inconceivable. See the various controversies over claims of God's omniscience, in particular the critical notion of foreknowledge.[1][2] These arguments are deeply concerned with the implications of predestination. Moses Maimonides formulated an argument regarding a person's free will, in traditional terms of good and evil actions, as follows: In his book Mere Christianity, Lewis argues that God is actually outside time and therefore does not "foresee" events, but rather simply observes them all at once. Free will argument for the nonexistence of God[edit] ^ The Free will Argument for the Nonexistence of God by Dan Barker, Freedom From Religion Foundation [1] Archived 2018-10-13 at the Wayback Machine Categories: Arguments against the existence of God	./cache/en-wikipedia-org-1616.html	./txt/en-wikipedia-org-1616.txt