id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_zurom5oikvc5pgdcbpj6zeklfi	Colin Farrelly	Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation	2007	32	.pdf	application/pdf	9654	580	55	Rather than bracket questions of feasibility and human nature, empiricallyoriented political theorists believe that real, non-ideal considerations (like our historical principles of justice, and those political theorists who take seriously real, non-ideal In this paper I argue that theorising about justice at the level of ideal theory is egalitarians who function at the level of ideal theory adopt a cost-blind approach to rights egalitarians to give priority to a serially ordered principle of equal basic liberties (Rawls, misfortune, mean the liberal egalitarian theories of justice cannot address the issue of tradeoffs that inevitably arises in real non-ideal societies that face the fact of scarcity. deficiencies which follow from the fact that Rawls functions at the level of ideal theory.1 what principles of justice we ought to affirm; that Rawls, Ronald Dworkin, Robert David Hume, Rawls argues that justice is only necessary and possible when society falls 	./cache/work_zurom5oikvc5pgdcbpj6zeklfi.pdf	./txt/work_zurom5oikvc5pgdcbpj6zeklfi.txt