id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_wf7fzchginf6ljfguhdhmlhx64	Andreas Follesdal	Tracking justice democratically	2017	22	.pdf	application/pdf	10119	744	50	Abstract: Is international judicial human rights review anti-democratic and therefore such judicial review of democratically enacted legislation and policy making. Keywords: epistemic democracy, judicial review, international human rights, the such Review of democratically enacted legislation and policy making (see also of Human Rights' (ECtHR) Review even of quite well functioning democratic The account of epistemic democracy laid out here holds that majoritarian democratic legitimacy of Review as part of democratic decision making: Such institutions may It values democratic decision making both for epistemic Epistemic arguments for democratic decision making procedures rights judicial review over state decisions in order to protect individuals and We now turn to consider how international human rights judicial review foster better epistemic majoritarian democratic decision making, and helps remedy Several of these limit human rights to 'democracy promoting' review prevent it from being a part of democratic decision procedures: Review serves as an 	./cache/work_wf7fzchginf6ljfguhdhmlhx64.pdf	./txt/work_wf7fzchginf6ljfguhdhmlhx64.txt