id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_m5nsaaqscvc2re25tlpp3dhgwq	Carl Knight	Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment	2009	13	.pdf	application/pdf	7354	399	59	problems with denying compensation for the other kind of expensive taste that might remain noncompensable, Cohen's position on taste appears to be either implausible or virtually indistinguishable from However, compensation for valuational judgment-based expensive taste might be A. Cohen, Equality, Justice, Responsibility, Expensive Taste. harsh treatment of valuational judgment-based expensive taste – which the equality debate has difficulty is due to the fact that, on the two available interpretations of Cohen's account, the noncompensable expensive taste – chosen brute taste – cannot be formulated in such a way that it is morally distinguishable from (compensable) chosen judgmental taste. Equality of welfare would even compensate in the case where an individual with such a taste justification for compensation for expensive judgmental tastes. which full compensation is to be provided in each case of valuational judgment-based taste, is compensation for valuational judgment-based expensive taste, would be exposed as such once a	./cache/work_m5nsaaqscvc2re25tlpp3dhgwq.pdf	./txt/work_m5nsaaqscvc2re25tlpp3dhgwq.txt