id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_jlpk7rha3bfkdlxceazqez5ga4	Jan-Willem van Prooijen	Procedural justice as autonomy regulation	2009	15	.pdf	application/pdf	14511	996	55	The present research investigated the relation between autonomy (i.e., freedom of choice) and procedural decision-making procedures when they experience deprivation of autonomy needs. Keywords: procedural justice, autonomy, self-determination, fairness, basic psychological needs Although such a relation between autonomy needs and procedural justice may seem plausible, empirical research hitherto has contribution by investigating to what extent satisfaction or deprivation of autonomy needs have implications for people's fairnessbased responses to decision-making procedures. autonomy needs has been largely ignored or overlooked in contemporary procedural justice research (e.g., De Cremer & Tyler, basis of social-cognitive procedural justice theories such as fairness heuristic theory (Lind, Kulik, Ambrose, & De Vera-Park, provided), results suggested that people increasingly value procedural justice cues that are supportive of their autonomy (i.e., voice autonomy needs (Deci & Ryan, 1985) but that procedural justice morality-based behavior, and, more important for the present purposes, (b) test whether the relation between autonomy and procedural justice may generalize to pro-organizational behaviors.	./cache/work_jlpk7rha3bfkdlxceazqez5ga4.pdf	./txt/work_jlpk7rha3bfkdlxceazqez5ga4.txt