key: cord-266764-q2vtrs95 authors: Munusamy, Thangaraj; Karuppiah, Ravindran; Faizal A Bahuri, Nor; Sockalingam, Sutharshan; Cham, Chun Yoong; Waran, Vicknes title: Telemedicine via Smart Glasses in Critical Care of the Neurosurgical Patient – A COVID-19 Pandemic Preparedness and Response in Neurosurgery date: 2020-09-18 journal: World Neurosurg DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.076 sha: doc_id: 266764 cord_uid: q2vtrs95 Objective The COVID-19 pandemic poses major risks to healthcare workers in neurocritical care. Recommendations are in place to limit medical personnel attending to the neurosurgical patient as a protective measure and to conserve personal protective equipment. However, the complexity of the neurosurgical patient proves to be a challenge and an opportunity for innovation. The goal of our study was to determine if telemedicine delivered through smart glasses was feasible and effective in an alternative method of conducting ward round on neurocritical care patients during the pandemic. Methods A random pair of Neurosurgery resident and specialist conducted consecutive virtual and physical ward rounds on neurocritical patients. A virtual ward round was first conducted remotely by a specialist who received real-time audiovisual information from a resident wearing smart glasses integrated with telemedicine. Subsequently, a physical ward round was performed together by the resident and specialist on the same patient. The management plans of both ward rounds were compared and the intrarater reliability was measured. On study completion a qualitative survey was performed. Results Ten paired ward rounds were performed on 103 neurocritical care patients with excellent overall intrarater reliability. Nine out of ten showed good to excellent internal consistency and one showed acceptable internal consistency. Qualitative analysis indicated wide user acceptance and high satisfaction rate with the alternative method. Conclusions Virtual ward rounds using telemedicine via smart glasses on neurosurgical patients in critical care were feasible, effective and widely accepted as an alternative to physical ward rounds during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 11 March 2020. 1 It causes a severe respiratory disease that often culminates in fatality especially in elderly patients or those with comorbidities. Its primary mode of transmission is airborne via droplets and the rate of transmission is alarmingly high. 2 Healthcare workers are at high risk of contracting the infection particularly when they are exposed to COVID-19 positive patients during aerosol generating procedures and interventions as warned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Merely being present in close proximity or in the vicinity of the patient could increase the risk significantly as the droplets can aerosolize up to 4 metres. 3 Neurosurgery is a specialty where acute patients are often ventilated and managed in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), hence healthcare workers who are involved in their care would be exposed to aerosols and airborne particulates. In addition, many neurosurgical patients are admitted to the hospital in a comatose or confused state and their identity and COVID-19 risk status are initially unknown. Thus, reviewing and managing an acute neurosurgical patient in the ICU would predispose the healthcare worker to a higher risk of occupational transmission of COVID- 19. 4 In view of these risk factors, ideally all healthcare workers who are present in the same treatment room or cubicle as the acute neurosurgical patient in the ICU should be made mandatory to wear the full armamentarium of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). This is neither practical nor cost-effective in a resource-constrained setting, especially when the global and nationwide supply of PPE is running low. 5 One potential solution would be to reduce the number of healthcare workers who interact with the neurosurgical patient to the J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f bare minimum as recommended by WHO. 6 This may prove to be difficult as most ICU ward rounds usually involve a number of doctors and nurses simultaneously. In a neurosurgical ICU there may be the need for intensivists, neurosurgical specialists, residents and nurses for multidisciplinary consultation on complex problems and also training. 7 Specifically during ward rounds, multiple staff members are required both for examination and documentation purposes. However, during this difficult period, attempts have been made in many units to try and only have a single doctor and a single nurse to interact and examine the patients during ward rounds or clinical review sessions. 8 Unfortunately, this may lead to sub-optimal management as often a junior doctor would assume the role and subsequently relays the information and findings to the specialist verbally in a delayed fashion. The junior doctor may not have the necessary expertise and experience to holistically manage a neurosurgical patient who may be ridden with complex medical and surgical issues. On the other hand, the specialist may miss certain clinically relevant information when he or she is not physically present by the bedside. This limitation becomes glaring when there is a need to convey visual or graphical representation from essential bedside devices in the ICU such as physiological and intracranial pressure monitors, ventilators, infusion pumps, computer and imaging terminals. Thus, a safer and practical option would be to facilitate the virtual presence of key medical personnel in the ICU, both routinely and when a need arises. This is possible via synchronous telemedicine which offers a real-time and contemporary solution to mitigate the shortcomings and bridge the communication gap during the COVID-19 pandemic. 9,10 Moreover, it can be applied to any clinical scenario to facilitate remote assessment and consultation with a high degree of clinical accuracy without compromising on patient care and safety. 11 Combining wearable technology such as smart glasses with telemedicine, offers the added advantage of J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f operation with a degree of freedom and unobtrusiveness as it provides view from the examining doctor's perspective with minimal line of sight impediment. 12 Such integrated system has the potential to co-exist with and streamline current clinical workflows and their synergistic combination would no doubt be useful in the transformation of healthcare to meet the clinical demands of the pandemic. Therefore, we have devised a simple yet effective solution using telemedicine via smart glasses to facilitate optimal management of neurosurgical patients in the ICU. In this article, we share our method and experience in implementing and sustaining this alternative management model to safeguard neurosurgical patients and healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have installed and integrated a secure mobile telemedicine system (MEDCOM Vision, Centre for Biomedical and Technology Integration, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia) into a commercially available smart glasses (Vuzix M400 Smart Glasses, Vuzix Corporation, Rochester, USA). The cost of a pair of the smart glasses was approximately $1,800 USD whereas the software was developed locally to conform to national and institutional regulations with emphasis on secure data storage and retrieval together with recognition, monitoring and control of registered users. In this study, the customised smart glasses was specifically used during the daily ward round session, all doctors attained competence and they were able to assemble, activate and start using the smart glasses and telemedicine system in less than five minutes. A copy of the SOP was provided as reference which included a guide on the sequence and essential parameters for teleconsultation in Neurosurgery together with an exemplary script. The smart glasses wearers were residents and they were taught how to safely disinfect the glasses after each use. On the other hand, the receiving doctors were specialists and they were taught how to participate in teleconsultation via any mobile device. Once the Neurosurgery team doctors were familiar and competent in teleconsultation via smart glasses, the study was commenced with institutional and ethical approval. This study used a single subject design consisting of ten virtual and ten physical ward round sessions. Each ward round team consist of a random pair of resident and specialist from a pool of three residents and two specialists. The team conducted two consecutive morning ward rounds daily -starting with a virtual ward round where the resident wore smart glasses and consulted the specialist in real-time and subsequently followed by a physical ward round where both resident and specialist conducted the ward round together (Video 1). A log of all usage of the J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f smart glasses was kept and the associated clinical interaction and conversation were recorded for analysis purposes. The two ward rounds were compared and analysed, particularly the problem list and management plans. If the outcome of both ward rounds differed from each other, a note was made on the reason and whether it was due to inaccuracy or inadequacy of the virtual ward round or availability of new information during the time interval. Consistency and intrarater reliability for the two ward rounds were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The following scale was used for both coefficients: excellent (> 0.9), good (> 0.8), acceptable (> 0.7), questionable (> 0.6), poor (> 0.5) and unacceptable (< 0.5). 13 A survey was sent to the users on completion of the study to assess acceptance, satisfaction, overall impact, efficacy and potential of this alternative method of teleconsultation. The team also convened regularly to discuss the difficulties and problems encountered in implementing the virtual ICU ward rounds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ten pair of ward rounds were performed in the study involving 103 patients. The summary of each paired ward round is shown in Table 1 and the total summary of all paired ward rounds combined is shown in Table 2 . The number of changes made to decision or management plan according to reason is shown in Table 3 . Nine out of the ten paired ward rounds show good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). The remaining paired ward round had an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.75). The overall intrarater reliability for all ten ward J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f rounds was excellent with an ICC of 0.936. The reasons for changes to decision or plan in the physical ward rounds were either due to inadequate information in the virtual ward rounds or availability of new information in the time interval between the two ward rounds. There were no inaccuracies observed in the information relayed during the virtual ward rounds. The summary of the overall user experience in this study is shown in Table 4 . The mode score of all attributes that compose user experience were either 4 or 5, thus indicating wide acceptance and high satisfaction with this alternative method of conducting ward rounds in the pandemic. Furthermore, Table 5 show that majority of users recognise the potential usage and application for smart glasses in a variety of healthcare settings. The use of smart glasses in medicine was pioneered in early 2010s and the initial specialties that adopted its use were primary care, dermatology and paediatric surgery. 14 Alas, the idea did not take off in earnest and usage was limited to a single-user setting, for example physicians used it to simultaneously access patient data by the bedside. These glasses however have been successfully utilised in business and industry to revolutionize and improve safety and productivity, especially in warehouse inventory management, high risk jobs that required safeguarding or when the supervision of more junior workers were required from a distance. 15, 16, 17 The COVID-19 pandemic created a situation similar to dealing with a hazardous work environment where the smart glasses have found necessity and success. Thus, our team decided to adapt its usage to a critical care environment within a hospital that was gazetted as J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f a COVID-19 treatment centre but at the same time was continuing to manage routine neurosurgical patients. By using the smart glasses, specialists monitoring the ward rounds were able to direct residents and junior staff members through the routine daily review of patients requiring critical care. This included physical examination, review of physiological parameters (both spot values and trends over a 24-hour period or longer), review of medications, blood results, radiological imaging and wound management. Therefore, the specialist was able to holistically and continuously "see" the exact first-hand clinical information in real-time and in a "bedside" manner to advise and guide the resident confidently and accurately. In all instances, visibility and audio-visual propagation were not a problem. The limitation during clinical examination was the inability for the specialist to observe a detailed physical examination including listening to the auscultation of chest and abdomen. 18, 19 Specialists were also unable to interact directly with patients who are conscious and able to communicate. In addition to the above, in the early phase of our study, we discovered that the residents may have difficulty adjusting and adapting to the smart glasses without prior training. During the first paired ward round in our study, the resident who used the smart glasses for the first time, quickly became overwhelmed with nausea and dizziness hence the study could not proceed beyond five patients. Post hoc analysis revealed that the resident was continuously shifting focus between the smart glasses display screen and the environment, thus he experienced a phenomenon similar to simulator sickness experienced by users of virtual reality glasses. 20, 21 Additionally, constantly focusing the eyes on a display screen at close focal distances causes visual fatigue, which immensely affected the duration of optimum usage of the smart J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f glasses. 22 Moreover, as the resident focused his central eye gaze on the display screen, his multitasking ability was significantly affected. Remarkably, despite the impediments, the first paired ward round was still able to achieve an acceptable internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.75. To improve user adaptability to the smart glasses, we organised a training session for all the residents and specialists before the subsequent paired ward rounds. In the training session, the residents were taught strategies to minimize sickness for example by adjusting the display screen to avoid significant obstruction of their field of view and refrain from looking at the display screen unless to localize an area of interest or prompted by the specialist. In addition, the residents were also taught how to conduct the virtual ward round seamlessly and present optimally to the specialist based on the SOP guidance. Ingeniously, a single training session was able to facilitate user adaptability and mitigate the shortcomings encountered during the first paired ward round. The residents were able to overcome the learning curve and attain confidence in using the smart glasses independently and effectively. This was reflected in the subsequent paired ward rounds which show good to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.8). Arguably, repeated learning may have contributed to the improvement over time. The use of technology can be seen as both an essential tool and as a barrier in critical care. 23, 24, 25 New technology is known to pose extra challenges, thus in order to be able to implement and use it as an aid rather than a hindrance or distraction, user acceptance and satisfaction are essential. Facilitating factors for sustainability of any new technology are clear benefits, active end-user involvement, adequate education and training, user-J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f friendliness, clear policies and seamless integration into existing frameworks or standards of care. 26, 27 These areas were addressed in our study and played a part in its success. Overall, our questionnaire findings show that there is significant potential for smart glasses in critical care of neurosurgical patients. Users accept incorporation of smart glasses into their daily work to aid management and clinical decision making. In our study, the smart glasses and telemedicine system proved to be user-friendly, reliable and accurate with high quality data transmission, hence clinically effective and sustainable. Some concerns were raised in the literature about reduced presence of specialists thereby potential compromise in patient safety and quality of care. 28 However, this was not observed in our study which showed a high degree of intrarater reliability between the virtual and physical ward rounds. Furthermore, no inaccuracies were observed in the communication and transfer of information via smart glasses. Nevertheless, as with any technology that improves efficiency and eases workflow, the primary danger would be that medical personnel may become complacent and depend entirely on this method of teleconsultation. As such, safe usage protocols and guidelines are necessary and periodic monitoring is recommended. Extrapolation for other use cases and to other specialities would require a similar approach before smart glasses can be deemed safe to be adopted as standard practice. Clinical demands in the ICU differs from other clinical areas due to rapid changes in patient condition and the need for immediate specialist consultation or intervention. ICU telemedicine is a promising mechanism to improve outcomes for critically ill patients. 29 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Moreover, with smart glasses, the ability to view the patient as a first-hand reviewer and provide accurate advice or remote guidance is highly desired and advantageous. 30, 31 Smart glasses can give the clinician information such as patients' data, clinical parameters or imaging studies within their field of vision so the clinician can use it simultaneously while performing other tasks or procedures. This can be very helpful as it helps to avoid looking away from the area of intervention or stepping away from the patient. 32 In addition, smart glasses integration with a mobile communication network permits real-time consultation with another authorised clinician. 33 This method of consultation can be used in a variety of areas and settings other than the ICU. These include onboard an ambulance to facilitate communication between paramedics and receiving hospital, out-of-hours consultation by the junior doctor with the specialist who is not on-site or even in-hours consultation if the specialist is away or busy at another clinical area. From the neurosurgical perspective, this method would also support long-distance management via real-time evaluation of patients and teleconsultations between nurses or general doctors in remote facilities and centrally located specialists or qualified neurosurgeons. This capability can potentially be cost-effective in avoiding unnecessary emergency transfer of patients, as well as optimizing patient safety. 34 Additionally, smart glasses can be widely used in training and education, from telementoring to remote supervision and guidance during procedures and interventions. Our study had several limitations. Firstly, it was limited by the small sample size of ten paired ward rounds. However, we managed to recruit over a hundred patients, thus data analysis and interpretation of findings were reliable. To adhere to infection control guidelines during the pandemic, we used a single subject design hence measured intrarater reliability which is generally considered to be inferior to interrater reliability as decisions may be contaminated by prior knowledge and repetition. This may result in overestimation of intrarater reliabilities. 36, 37 The study findings were specific to our specialty and institution, thus may be the result of existing workflow in our hospital where mobile technology is routinely used to support information sharing. Furthermore, given the different needs and experiences of each responder, the subjectivity of response and recorded information are potential contributors to bias. 38 We also have not conducted an evaluation in regard to the economic and ergonomic benefit of using smart glasses. 39 Nevertheless, our approach can be considered as the first step to improve the critical care management of neurosurgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic while adhering to local regulations, resource constraints and physical distancing measures. The smart glasses itself is subject to several technical limitations. 40 The wireless connection to the mobile network occasionally exhibited brief lag, however this did not affect the conduct or flow of the virtual ward round. The smart glasses would need to be disinfected J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f while its battery would need to be charged after each use. Besides, our study was also limited to the evaluation of only one particular type of smart glasses. As the technology evolves especially in this trying time, more types of smart glasses would become available to clinicians and medical educators. Therefore, head-to-head studies will be important here to explore their individual benefits, advantages and ability to revolutionize healthcare and education. 41 With more research to come, the solution using smart glasses would only get better and popular. We have shown that virtual neurocritical care ward round using telemedicine via smart glasses is feasible, effective and acceptable as an alternative to physical ward round to circumvent manpower shortage, physical distancing measures and key shortage of PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, as with any healthcare technology, attention must be paid to certain technical details, training requirements and clinical nuances to achieve optimal outcomes. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 1 Technical quality 0 0 0 60 40 4 2 Clinical accuracy 0 0 0 40 60 5 3 Reliability 0 0 0 40 60 5 4 Overall efficacy 0 0 0 40 60 5 5 User friendliness 0 0 40 0 60 5 6 User satisfaction 0 0 0 40 60 5 *Attributes scored on a 5-point Likert scale J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19 Aerosol and Surface Distribution of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Hospital Wards The impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgeons and the strategy for triaging non-emergent operations: a global neurosurgery study Critical supply shortages -The need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic World Health Organization. Infection prevention and control during health care when The application of Temporary Ark Hospitals in controlling COVID 19 spread: The experiences of one Temporary Ark Hospital Telemedicine and COVID-19: an Observational Study of Rapid Scale Up in a US Academic Medical System COVID-19: Launching Neurosurgery into the Era of Telehealth in the United States Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned and Transformation of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. World Neurosurg Surgeon point-of-view recording: Using a highdefinition head-mounted video camera in the operating room Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology Using google glass to solve communication and surgical education challenges in the operating room Augmented Reality "Smart Glasses" in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health Enabling technologies for operator 4.0: A survey Augmented Reality Smart Glasses in the Smart Factory: Product Evaluation Guidelines and Review of Available Products Telemedicine for Outpatient Neurosurgical Oncology Care: Lessons Learned for the Future During the COVID-19 Letter to the Editor: The Use of Telemedicine by Neurosurgeons During the Covid Era: Preliminary Results of a Cross-Sectional Research Virtual Reality Sickness and Challenges Behind Different Technology and Content Settings Simulator sickness in Augmented Reality training using the Microsoft HoloLens Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue Managing technology in the intensive care unit: The nurses' experience Use of technological equipment in critical care units: Nurses' perceptions in Greece Nursing care in a high-technological environment: Experiences of critical care nurses Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals Implementation of newly adopted technology in acute care settings: A qualitative analysis of clinical staff Healthcare professionals' views of smart glasses in intensive care: A qualitative study Telemedicine/Virtual ICU: Where Are We and Where Are We Going? Using Google Glass in Nonsurgical Medical Settings: Systematic Review First-Person Point-of-View-Augmented Reality for Central Line Insertion Training: A Usability and Feasibility Study Smart glasses for caring situations in complex care environments: Scoping review Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses Telemedicine for Neurotrauma Prevents Unnecessary Transfers: An Update from a Nation-Wide Program of Albania and Analysis of 590 Patients Biomedical Visualisation. Biomed Vis Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Colloid Cyst Risk Score Statistical methodology: II. Reliability and validity assessment in study design, Part A Information bias in health research: Definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods Lessons Learned from Google Glass: Telemedical Spark or Unfulfilled Promise? Evaluation of Google Glass technical limitations on their integration in medical systems We would like to thank Dr Tan Yunrong from the Department of Surgery for his contribution to this study.