key: cord-337172-vgw8uz83
authors: Kaltenboeck, Anna; Rajkumar, S. Vincent
title: The Case for Masks – Health Care Workers Can Benefit, Too
date: 2020-04-20
journal: Mayo Clin Proc
DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.014
sha: 
doc_id: 337172
cord_uid: vgw8uz83

nan

As the coronavirus crisis in the United States evolves, states and healthcare organizations are meeting the limits of their preparedness for surging cases that require critical care. Evidence to guide practice is scant. Four months into the pandemic, there are models of possible trajectories of the disease but there are still no clear, national recommendations to guide practice that could reduce the spread of infection in hospitals facing limited availability of personal protective equipment (PPE) including surgical masks and N95 masks. This confusion complicates the tradeoff decisions hospitals must now make between conserving supply for the immediate future, and limiting spread of infection now. Anticipating even greater need as the virus spreads in communities across the country, many have opted to limit the use of PPEs, especially N95 masks, to only certain clinical procedures and patient encounters. As the New York Times reported recently, doctors, nurses, and staff at hospitals across the country are sounding the alarm about risk of exposure. 1 But one solution may be hiding in plain sight, and it's rooted in basic high school physics. The largest respiratory droplets, which are expelled by coughing, sneezing, or speaking, come from the pharynx and upper respiratory tract. 2 This is also where the virus replicates the most. 3 Volume is a cubic function, so these large droplets can hold exponentially more copies of the virus than small ones. The large ones quickly succumb to gravity due to their size, while the smaller aerosols, generated in the lower respiratory tracts of infected patients, can remain suspended in the air for several hours. 4 This makes N95 respirators indispensable for protecting healthcare workers treating critically ill patients; it also raises the question of whether more humble alternatives could block the large droplets outside critical care settings. As Dr. Sui

Huang lays out in a brilliant exposition of the problem, even makeshift masks create a physical barrier that limits where these droplets can land. 5 While wearing them doesn't stop all exposure, it is curtailed, and studies of crude masks made from basic consumer materials suggest that they can make a difference.

Perhaps more importantly, masks drastically reduce the number of droplets that make it beyond the wearer's mask and into their surroundings. This insight may be critical for coronavirus. Preliminary analysis of nasals swabs from asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals indicate that they appear to have similar viral loads. 6 Using a mask allows even those who do not suspect that they are infected to reduce the probability of transmission. Added to social distancing, this barrier could reduce the number of viral copies making contact with others and coming to rest on surfaces, waiting for the unwitting brush of a hand that later meets the face. Countries that have adopted uniform mask requirements, such as the Czech Republic, have benefitted from a more notable flattening of their epidemic curves than their counterparts. 7 The CDC recently followed suit, recommending that the general public wear makeshift masks in public areas where social distancing is difficult. 8 However, some healthcare organizations have remained slow to consider them for all employees coming into work.

While current rationing helps preserve the supply of N95s and procedural masks, it comes at the risk of adding to the problem by infecting those working in hospitals. The same healthcare workers trying to avoid transmission from patients are susceptible to another sourceeach other. One study suggests that physicians spend around a quarter of their time caring for patients. 9 Though that measure likely varies by specialty and may be far higher under current circumstances, it highlights the fact that healthcare involves significant interaction outside of patient care. Even with rapid advances in the use of telemedicine and remote work policies for non-essential workers, this still leaves plenty of opportunities to unwittingly pass the virus among unprotected colleagues. Reports from other countries indicate that, relative to other groups, healthcare workers are over-represented among confirmed cases. Estimates from several US states suggests that as many as 20% of COVID-19 cases may be among healthcare workers. 10 The high numbers suggest that exposure beyond patient care is responsible for at least some transmission. 11 Adding to the problem is that higher inoculating doses of certain pathogens are hypothesized to result in more severe disease, 12, 13 and clinics and hospitals are the most likely places to encounter highly concentrated doses of the coronavirus. Initial analyses and anecdotal reports indicate that healthcare workers are indeed becoming more ill than the general population. 14, 15 The Joint Commission, which accredits hospitals, has endorsed allowing workers to use their own, privately owned masks and respirators. 16 But even these resources run dry quickly.

Some groups are already sewing masks for donation to hospitals that are critically short of PPE.

We suggest that hospitals treat makeshift masks not only as substitute but also as a complement to PPE, where none is currently being used due to rationing. Requiring that anyone on the premises of a patient care organization, whether in clinical or non-clinical workspaces, cover their nose and mouth with a mask -homemade if necessary -is a valuable measure in its own right. Some hospitals have already adopted this policy. We urge that this become a universal policy across the country in all health care institutions and nursing homes. The math of coronavirus hasn't worked in our favor, but it isn't set in stone. Even if we cannot completely prevent transmission, we can take simple steps to reduce its spread. Asking that the general public wear homemade masks was a step in the right direction. We recommend that all persons entering clinics and hospitals, in clinical settings as well as any other non-clinical areas where healthcare workers convene, should wear a mask. This can be a surgical mask if possible, but a makeshift homemade mask should be permitted if surgical masks are unavailable or are in short supply another. We must consider it as a small investment that pays compound interest by safeguarding healthcare workers, and flattening the curve by reducing the likelihood of spreading the virus among themselves, their patients, and families.

Frightened Doctors Face Off With Hospitals Over Rules on Protective Gear. The New York Times

Relative contributions of four exposure pathways to influenza infection risk

SARS-CoV-2 Entry Genes Are Most Highly Expressed in Nasal Goblet and Ciliated Cells within Human Airways

Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1

COVID-19: Why we should all wear masks -there is a new scientific rationale

The early phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in

Simple DIY masks could help flatten the curve. We should all wear them in public

Recommendation regarding the use of cloth face coverings, especially in areas of significant community-based transmission. Ceners for Disease Control and Prevention

Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties

Health care workers see wave of coronavirus coming in their ranks. NBC News

Virus Knocks Thousands of Health Workers Out of Action in Europe. The New York Times

Coronavirus infections: Epidemiological, clinical and immunological features and hypotheses

How Does the Coronavirus Behave Inside the Patient? The New Yorker

Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population