key: cord-327501-8s6dvanf
authors: Schwaiger, Julia; Karbiener, Michael; Aberham, Claudia; Farcet, Maria R; Kreil, Thomas R
title: No SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization by Intravenous Immunoglobulins Produced From Plasma Collected Before the 2020 Pandemic
date: 2020-09-17
journal: J Infect Dis
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa593
sha: 
doc_id: 327501
cord_uid: 8s6dvanf

The 2020 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is caused by a zoonotic coronavirus transmitted to humans, similar to earlier events. Whether the other, seasonally circulating coronaviruses induce cross-reactive, potentially even cross-neutralizing, antibodies to the new species in humans is unclear. The question is particularly relevant for people with immune deficiencies, as their health depends on treatment with immunoglobulin preparations that need to contain neutralizing antibodies against the pathogens in their environment. Testing 54 intravenous immunoglobulin preparations, produced from plasma collected in Europe and the United States, confirmed highly potent neutralization of a seasonal coronavirus; however, no cross-neutralization of the new SARS-CoV-2 was seen.

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) are produced from thousands of pooled plasma donations, and thus contain a wide variety of antibodies the donors have generated against infectious disease agents. IVIG can therefore protect people with immune deficiencies against circulating bacterial and viral infections.

When a new pathogen emerges, antibodies to the new agent only become detectable in IVIG preparations after a certain proportion of plasma donors have contracted the infection and successfully recovered from it. An even higher number of convalescent plasma donors is needed to result in neutralizing antibody (nAb) levels high enough for the resulting IVIG to afford protection against the new infectious agent. After the arrival of West Nile virus (WNV) in the United States, for example, it took several years before the prevalence of WNV nAbs reached approximately 0.5% in the plasma donor community, at which point they became detectable in IVIG lots produced from plasma donated in the United States. Thereafter, a significant proportion of IVIG lots even reached in vivo protective levels [1] .

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread around the globe at unprecedented speed, infecting millions of people within the first 6 months of circulation. The virus belongs to the Coronaviridae family of viruses, which contains several species of importance for human health. The human coronaviruses (HCoVs) 229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1 are in circulation as seasonal respiratory viruses that mostly cause self-limiting and mild infections but which can also lead to pneumonia and bronchiolitis [2] [3] [4] , whereas the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) caused a prolonged outbreak mainly limited to the Arabian Peninsula, and the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 viruses have established global transmissions chains-the latter 3 associated with significant human mortality.

Due to the widespread and long-term circulation of HCoVs, and the pooling of plasma from thousands of donors for every lot, IVIGs contain significant levels of HCoV nAb levels, as was shown for example for HCoV-NL63 [5] . Whether these HCoV antibodies cross-react with, or even neutralize, the related SARS-CoV-2 has not been fully elucidated. To date, antibody binding assays have shown some cross-reactivity between different HCoVs and SARS-CoV-2; however, functional and therefore clinically more relevant virus neutralization assays have shown no or only very low levels of cross-reactive antibodies [6] [7] [8] . The question is of significant clinical relevance, as SARS-CoV-2 cross-neutralizing antibodies in IVIGs, if they were present, might afford some protection to people with immune deficiencies and may even represent a treatment option for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

The current study tested a representative number of IVIG lots for nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 and the longer-circulating HCoV-229E, to establish clarity about cross-neutralization of the pandemic virus by antibodies induced by earlier circulating seasonal coronaviruses. In addition, results from the ongoing monitoring of the plasma donor community for the development of SARS-COV-2 antibodies are presented.

A total of 54 IVIG lots fractionated from plasma collected prior to the circulation of SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed. The IVIG lots were manufactured from plasma either donated by plasmapheresis (source) or recovered from whole-blood donations (recovered), in the United States (Gammagard Liquid; Baxter Healthcare Corp.; n = 30) or central Europe, that is Austria, Germany, and Czech Republic (KIOVIG; Baxter AG; n = 24). These 54 IVIG lots were tested in 2 independent experiments for nAbs (1 European lot was in a single assay due to volume constraints).

Two prepandemic plasma donations were collected in April and May 2019 by BioLife Austria.

Human plasma pool samples were generated by the combination of 6 individual donations obtained in the same week at Austrian plasma donation centers (BioLife). The pools were assembled from donations collected in week 13 (last week of March; n = 40), week 14 (n = 80), week 15 (n = 80), week 16 (n = 80), week 20 (n = 100), week 24 (n = 80), and week 28 (first week of July; n = 100) of 2020, that is during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 was calculated from data provided by the Austrian Federal Ministry for Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection (www. sozialministerium.at) and Statistics Austria (www.statistik.at).

SARS-CoV-2 nAb titers were determined in IVIG and human plasma samples that were used undiluted, or prediluted with cell culture medium 1:4, 1:5, 1:10, or 1:20 depending on sample amount available, and then serially diluted in 2-fold steps. Equal volumes of sample dilutions were mixed with virus stock at 10 3.0 tissue culture infectious doses 50% per milliliter (TCID 50 / mL) SARS-CoV-2 (strain BavPat1/2020, kindly provided by C. Drosten and V. Corman, Charité Berlin, Germany) and incubated for 150 minutes ± 15 minutes, before titration on Vero cells (Cat. no. 84113001, European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK) in 8-fold replicates per dilution. The virus-induced cytopathic effect was determined after 5-7 days of incubation. The reciprocal sample dilution resulting in 50% virus neutralization (NT 50 ) was determined using the Spearman-Kärber formula, and the calculated neutralization titer for 50% of the wells reported as 1:X. The detection limits were as follows: <1:0.8 for undiluted, <1:3.1 for 1:4 prediluted, <1:3.9 for 1:5 prediluted, <1:7.7 for 1:10 prediluted, and <1:15.4 for 1:20 prediluted IVIG.

The neutralization assay (µNT) included several validity criteria, that is confirmatory titration of input virus infectivity, cell viability, and neutralization testing of an internal reference standard, all of which had to comply with defined ranges.

The neutralization assay for HCoV-229E antibodies is essentially identical to the SARS-CoV-2, where samples were used undiluted or prediluted, then serially diluted in 2-fold steps and mixed 1:2 with 10 3.0 TCID 50 /mL HCoV-229E (Cat. no. VR-740, American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], Rockville, MD), incubated, and titrated on MRC-5 cells (Cat. no. CCL-171, ATCC, Rockville, MD). The virus-induced cytopathic effect was determined after 7-9 days of incubation.

Graphical illustration and statistical analysis (paired t tests) were done using GraphPad Prism v8.1.1 software.

The validity, specificity, and reliability of the SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay used in the current study were demonstrated by the analysis of 100 convalescent plasma donations from polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases [9] and was the basis for the correlation of function against diverse binding assays [10] . As controls, 2 plasma samples collected before the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 did not contain SARS-CoV-2 nAbs, as expected, but neutralized HCoV-229E with NT 50 values of 1:43 and 1:26, respectively.

SARS-CoV-2 nAb titers were below the limit of detection for all 54 IVIG lots tested, irrespective of geographic origin of the plasma (Europe vs United States) and plasma collection modality (recovered vs source) ( Figure 1A) .

In contrast, HCoV-229E nAb titers between 1:43 and 1:196 (mean = 1:98) were measured for the 54 IVIG lots tested ( Figure 1B) . IVIG lots produced from recovered plasma contained significantly higher levels of nAb to HCoV-229E as compared to IVIG lots produced from source plasma, independent of the geographic origin. A significant, although quantitatively minor, difference was also found between IVIG lots manufactured from source plasma collected in either the United States or Europe.

To evaluate the potential development of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the plasma donor community, samples of plasma pools of 6 donations each were tested. The use of pools enabled testing of a high amount of plasma donations for SARS-CoV-2 nAbs with the biosafety level-3 functional assay. As the mean SARS-CoV-2 µNT 50 of plasma donations is rather high (approximately 1:230 [9] ) even the nAbs of only 1 positive sample within a pool are detectable in this assay.

Testing a total of 560 plasma pools of 6 donations each, in total reflective of 3360 plasma donations, from week 13 (ie, last week of March) until week 28 (ie, first week of July) 2020 revealed that most of these pools had SARS-CoV-2 µNT titers below the limit of detection ( Table 1 ). The first pool with detectable nAbs to SARS-CoV-2 was collected in week 14. Further positive pools were found in weeks 15, 16, 24, and 28. Up to 7% of the tested pools showed nAbs to SARS-CoV-2, which indicates that up to 1.17% of the plasma donors were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nAbs at a cumulative incidence of COVID-19 in Austria of 0.21% (Table 1) .

Our analysis of IVIG lots revealed high nAb titers to HCoV-229E ( Figure 1B) , which confirmed the presence of functionally intact nAbs in these lots. It is interesting to note that in IVIG lots produced from recovered plasma significantly higher titers to HCoV-229E were found compared to IVIG lots produced from source plasma, independent of plasma origin. Recovered plasma is usually obtained from older donors [11] . A trend towards increasing probability of HCoV-229E infections with age has been detected in the Scottish [3] and US [4] population. Furthermore, higher HCoV-229E-specific nAb titers were found in older study participants (60-85 years) compared to younger ones (21-40 years) [12] . Thus, a higher infection rate with HCoV-229E in older people and consequently the generation of neutralizing HCoV-229E-specific antibodies in the older plasma donors would explain the higher HCoV-229E titers found in IVIG lots produced from recovered plasma.

Low levels of cross-neutralizing Abs have earlier been demonstrated between specific pairs of coronaviruses, specifically between SARS-CoV-2 sera and SARS-CoV [6] and SARS-CoV sera and MERS [13] .

In clear contrast, testing the same lots of IVIG that were shown to contain high HCoV-229E nAb titers with a highly specific SARS-CoV-2 µNT did not detect SARS-CoV-2-specific nAbs. These results are entirely consistent with the absence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the plasma used for production of these IVIG lots, as this plasma was donated well before the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

The current study, as well as an earlier study that tested 21 IVIG lots (9 Gamunex C, 10 Gammagard Liquid, 2 other) with a SARS-CoV-2-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; receptor-binding domain or spike protein) that was shown to correlate well with a neutralization test [14] revealed the absence of cross-reactive antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in IVIG lots produced from prepandemic plasma. Currently available IVIGs can therefore not be expected to afford protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nevertheless, several clinical trials currently investigate IVIG at high dosage in the treatment of COVID-19 patients (clinicaltrials.gov), with the expected benefit attributable to the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory capacity of IVIG, rather than an antiviral effect. With increasing numbers of human infections, including in the plasma donor community, it is interesting to follow the development of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in plasma donations and, after the several months production cycle time between plasma donation and IVIG lot release, also in IVIG lots. A longitudinal study on this topic is currently in progress. In this context it is noteworthy that the mean nAb titers induced by WNV [1] and SARS-CoV-2 [9] infection are of similar magnitude. After the emergence of WNV in the United States, nAb titers became detectable in IVIGs after approximately 0.5% of the population had contracted and recovered from the infection. In Austria, testing of plasma pool samples indicated that up to 1.17% of plasma donors were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nAbs. Based on the current number of reported SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United States (approximately 4.3 million per 30 July 2020; www.cdc.gov), and an estimated rate of >40% asymptomatic infections [15] , more than 7.2 million people in the United States could have been infected already, that is 2.2% of the approximately 330 million population. Based on these facts, the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nAbs in IVIG lots produced from US plasma, the major source for fractionation, is expected within the next few months.

Another, more immediately available possibility for the treatment of COVID-19 is production of a hyper-IVIG from the plasma of COVID-19 convalescent donors (CoVIg-19), and developmental work is currently under way through a large alliance of plasma stakeholders (https://www.covig-19plasmaalliance.org).

West Nile virus infection in plasma of blood and plasma donors, United States

Update on human rhinovirus and coronavirus infections

Epidemiology of seasonal coronaviruses: establishing the context for the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019

Human coronavirus circulation in the United States

Inhibition of human coronavirus NL63 infection at early stages of the replication cycle

Lack of crossneutralization by SARS patient sera towards SARS-CoV-2

A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: antibody kinetics, correlates of protection, and association of antibody responses with severity of disease. medRxiv

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-specific antibody responses in coronavirus disease patients

Characterization of 100 sequential SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma donations

Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies with eight commercially available immunoassays

Measles virus neutralizing antibodies in immunoglobulin lots produced from plasma collected in Europe or the United States

Antibodies to coronaviruses are higher in older compared with younger adults and binding antibodies are more sensitive than neutralizing antibodies in identifying coronavirus-associated illnesses

Cross-reactive antibodies in convalescent SARS patients' sera against the emerging novel human coronavirus EMC (2012) by both immunofluorescent and neutralizing antibody tests

A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans

Prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: a narrative review