id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-263279-afdmegq0	Uhteg, Katharine	Comparing the analytical performance of three SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic assays	2020-04-26		.txt	text/plain	3175	186	51	Of the first assays that were available for validations were the CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR panel assay (IDT, Coralville, IA) as well as the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR (Altona Diagnostics, Hamburg, Germany), and both were initially validated for clinical use at the Johns Hopkins Hospital Medical Microbiology laboratory. To compare the analytical performance of the three assays, positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 clinical specimens (using the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 as the reference method as this assay was the first to be offered in house for clinical diagnosis) were tested by the CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR and/ or the ePlex® SARS-CoV-2 assays. Comparing the performance of the CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR to the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 included testing 20 positive and 48 negative clinical NP specimens. In this study, we compared the analytical performance of three different molecular assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2; the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, ePlex® SARS-CoV-2, and the CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR tests.	./cache/cord-263279-afdmegq0.txt	./txt/cord-263279-afdmegq0.txt