key: cord-308110-cco3aq4n authors: Okamoto, Mika; Toyama, Masaaki; Baba, Masanori title: The chemokine receptor antagonist cenicriviroc inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro date: 2020-07-30 journal: Antiviral Res DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104902 sha: doc_id: 308110 cord_uid: cco3aq4n Cenicriviroc (CVC) is a small-molecule chemokine receptor antagonist with highly potent and selective anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) activity through antagonizing C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) as a coreceptor of HIV-1. CVC also strongly antagonizes C-C chemokine receptor type 2b (CCR2b), thereby it has potent anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. CVC is currently under clinical trials in the patients for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, in which immune cell activation and dysregulation of proinflammatory cytokines play an important role in its pathogenesis. In this study, CVC was examined for its inhibitory effect on the replication of SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, in cell cultures and found to be a selective inhibitor of the virus. The 50% effective concentrations of CVC were 19.0 and 2.9 μM in the assays based on the inhibition of virus-induced cell destruction and viral RNA levels in culture supernatants of the infected cells, respectively. Interestingly, the CCR5-specific antagonist maraviroc did not show any anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity. Although the mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 inhibition by CVC remains to be elucidated, CCR2b does not seem to be its target molecule. Considering the fact that the regulation of excessive immune activation is required to treat COVID-19 patients at the late stage of the disease, CVC should be further pursued for its potential in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The pandemic of severe pneumonia caused by the transmission of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a serious threat to humanity (Di Gennaro et al., 2020; Harapan et al., 2020; Helmy, et al., 2020) . At present, no vaccines exist, and the nucleoside analog remdesivir (RDV) has recently been approved for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection (Grein et al., 2020) . RDV has broad-spectrum antiviral activity against several viruses, including Ebola virus and coronaviruses. In addition to RDV, there is an attempt to treat COVID-19 with existing drugs developed for other purposes. These include hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine (Pastick et al., 2020) , the anti-influenza virus agent favipiravir (Pilkington et al., 2020) , and the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitor lopinavir/ritonavir . More recently, the anti-parasitic agent ivermectin has been shown to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in cell cultures (Caly et al., 2020) . However, these drugs are not optimized for SARS-CoV-2, so that they may have inevitable adverse effects due to the requirement of higher dosages. Furthermore, these antiviral agents must be used at an early stage of infection, since severe deterioration of pneumonia in some patients is considered to be closely associated with not viral replication but "cytokine storm" caused by dysregulated and excessive cytokine release from activated immune cells (Ye et al., 2020) . Therefore, the use of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory agents is mandatory in the late stage of this disease (Alijotas-Reig et al., 2020) . We have examined several compounds for their inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 replication in cell cultures and found that the chemokine receptor antagonist cenicriviroc (CVC) inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2. CVC is a C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) antagonist with potent and selective anti-HIV-1 activity (Baba et al., 2005) . In addition, CVC antagonizes not only CCR5 but also C-C chemokine receptor type 2b (CCR2b). Since CCR2b is the receptor of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), CVC exerts anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects in vivo (Dawson et al., 2003; Xia and Sui, 2009) . In fact, CVC is currently under clinical trials for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), in which immune cell activation and dysregulation of proinflammatory cytokines play an important role in its pathogenesis (Pedrosa et al., 2020) . VeroE6 cell line expressing transmembrane protease serine 2 (VeroE6/TMPRSS2) highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection was obtained from Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB) Cell Bank in Japan (JCRB no. JCRB1819) and used for virus propagation and antiviral assays after removal of mycoplasma contamination. Vero cells were also used for experiments. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 1 mg/ml G418 (Nacalai Tesque). For antiviral assays, the cells were cultured in the absence of G418. SARS-CoV-2 (WK-521 strain, GISAID database ID EPI_ISL_408667), a clinical isolate from a COVID-19 patient, was provided by National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan . The infectious virus titer was determined in VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells and expressed as 50% cell culture infectious dose (CCID 50 ) per ml. CVC and maraviroc (MRV) were purchased from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ). The nucleotide/nucleoside analogs RDV and favipiravir (FPV) were obtained from ChemScence (Monmouth Junction, NJ) and Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX), respectively. MCP-1 was purchased from PetpoTech (Rocky Hill, NJ). MRV is the CCR5 antagonist clinically approved for treatment of HIV-1 infection (Woollard and Kanmogne, 2015) . Except for MCP-1, these compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 20 mM or higher to exclude the cytotoxicity of DMSO and stored at -20°C until use. MCP-1 was dissolved in distilled water. VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells (2 × 10 4 cells/well) were cultured in a 96-well microtiter plate and incubated at 37°C. After 24 h, the cells were mock-infected or infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 and cultured in the absence or presence of various concentrations of test compounds. After 3 days, the number of viable cells was determined by a tetrazolium dye method. Briefly, 100 μl of culture medium was removed from each well, and 10 μl of water-soluble tetrazolium dye solution (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was added. After incubating at 37°C for 2 h, 100 μl of isopropanol acidified with hydrochloric acid was added, and the absorbance was read at two wavelengths (450 and 620 nm) with a microplate reader (Pauwels et al., 1988) . The 50% effective concentration (EC 50 ) of each compound was calculated from a dose-dependent curve based on the viability of infected and uninfected cells. All experiments using SARS-CoV-2 were conducted in biosafety level 3 (BSL3) facilities of Kagoshima University. For immunofluorescence microscopy, Vero cells (2 × 10 4 cells/well) were cultured in a microtiter plate and incubated. After 24 h, the cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at a MOI of 0.1 in the absence of CVC and incubated. After 2 h, the cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove unadsorbed virus particles and further incubated in the absence or presence of 40 μM CVC. After 3 days, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min. Then, the solution was removed, and the cells were washed with PBS and permeabilized with methanol. After washing with PBS, the cells were treated with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 0.1% Tween 20 (Fujifilm Wako, Osaka, Japan) and incubated overnight at 4°C with an anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid rabbit antibody (GeneTex, Irvine, CA). After incubation, the cells were washed with PBS and stained with the secondary antibody goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluoro ® 488; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The cells were washed with PBS, stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and observed under a fluorescent microscope (BZ-X800; Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The inhibitory effect of compounds on SARS-CoV-2 replication was also evaluated by the viral RNA levels in culture supernatants of the infected cells. VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were infected with the virus and incubated for 3 days in the absence or presence of test compounds, as described above. Ten μl of each culture supernatant was mixed with 10 μl of SideStep Lysis and Stabilization Buffer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and diluted with 80 μl of distilled water. The amount of viral RNA was measured by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using TaqMan Gene Expression Cells-to-CT TM Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), according to the manufacturer's protocol except for its cell lysis step. The primer pair 5'-AAATTTTGGGGACCAGGAAC-3' and 5'-TGGCAGCTGTGTAGGTCAAC-3' and the probe 5'-FAM-ATGTCGCGCATTGGCATGGA-TAMRA-3' were used for real-time PCR reat-time RT-PCR to determine the amount of viral RNA, as described above. When VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and incubated in the absence of compounds for 3 days, the cells were completely destroyed by the virus-induced cytopathic effect (Fig. 1B) . Such cell destruction was not observed for the infected cells in the presence of 20 μM CVC, although some morphological changes were identified (Fig. 1D ). In contrast, MRV did not inhibit the virus-induced cell destruction even at 40 μM (Fig. 1F) . The EC 50 s of CVC and MRV were 19 ± 0.2 and > 40 μM, respectively, based on the inhibition of virus-induced cell destruction (Table 1) . Both compounds did not show apparent cytotoxicity at concentrations up to 80 μM. Dose-dependent protection of the infected cells from virus-induced cell destruction was observed for CVC but not for MRV (Fig. 2) . These results indicate that CVC is a selective inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication. As previously reported , RDV proved to be a potent and selective inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication in our assay, whereas FPV did not show any selective inhibition even at a concentration of 80 μM (Table 1 and Fig. S1 ). The anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity was also examined by the inhibition of viral antigen expression in Vero cells. Vero cells is less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 replication than VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells. In fact, Vero cells were not destroyed by the virus-induced cytopathic effect on day 3 after infection (Fig. 3A) . However, viral antigen expression was observed for many cells in the absence of CVC (Fig. 3B ). In contrast, the antigen expression was completely inhibited in the presence of 40 μM CVC (Fig. 3D) . When the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of CVC was evaluated by the viral RNA levels in culture supernatants of the infected cells, CVC significantly and dose-dependently reduced the amount of viral RNA in culture supernatants (Fig. 4A ). Its EC 50 in this assay was 2.9 μM, and more than 95% inhibition was achieved by CVC at a concentration of 10 μM. In contrast, MRV did not reduce the viral RNA levels at concentrations up to 40 μM In 2005, we have reported that the small molecule and orally bioavailable CCR5 antagonist CVC inhibits HIV-1 replication at subnanomolar concentrations in vitro (Baba et al., 2005) . The anti-HIV-1 activity of CVC is attributed to the inhibition of viral entry using CCR5 as a coreceptor. However, different from other anti-HIV-1 CCR5 antagonists such as MRV, CVC also suppresses the binding of MCP-1 to CCR2b-expressing cells. This unique feature of CVC encouraged its manufacturer to develop this compound as an agent for treatment of NASH. A recent randomized, placebo-controlled trial of CVC for treatment of NASH demonstrated that twice as many subjects achieved improvement in fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis compared with placebo (Friedman et al., 2018; Tacke, 2018) . Safety and tolerability of CVC were found to be comparable to placebo, suggesting that it can be administered safely to COVID-19 patients for preventing severe deterioration of pneumonia due to the cytokine storm. In fact, alveolar macrophage-borne MCP-1 was reported to be a key agent in the initiation of the systemic inflammation of alveolar hypoxia in rats, and a CCR2b receptor antagonist prevented the mesenteric inflammation of alveolar hypoxia (Chao et al. 2011) . Furthermore, a recent study on transcriptome sequencing of the RNAs isolated from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells specimens of COVID-19 patients revealed the association between its pathogenesis and excessive cytokine release including MCP-1 (Xiong et al. 2020 ). It will be claimed that the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of CVC in vitro is insufficient for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. However, our antiviral assay system using (Table 1 and data not shown). The broad-spectrum anti-RNA virus agent FPV was not inhibitory to SARS-CoV-2 replication even at 80 μM (Table 1 and Fig. S1 ), which is consistent with a previous report (Choy et al. 2020) . The anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of CVC was more obvious, when determined by the inhibition of viral RNA levels in culture supernatants. Its EC 50 was 2.9 μM (Fig. 4) , which was similar to those of RDV (1.9 μM) and ivermectin (2.2-2.8 μM) (data not shown and Caly et al., 2020, respectively) . Thus, although the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of CVC in vitro is modest, we cannot exclude the possibility that CVC exhibits some antiviral efficacy in COVID-19 patients. The target molecule of CVC remains to be elucidated. Our preliminary studies on its mechanism of action revealed that CVC did not interfere with the entry of SARS-CoV-2 (data not shown). Unlike HIV-1, CCR5 is not the target of CVC for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication, since another potent CCR5 antagonist MRV was totally inactive (Fig. 2B and Fig. 4B ). Furthermore, MCP-1 could not block SARS-CoV-2 infection (data not shown), suggesting that CCR2b is not the target molecule either. Further studies, such as a time-of-addition experiment and biochemical approaches, are required to elucidate the mechanism of action, and they are currently in progress. In conclusion, in addition to the potent anti-inflammatory activity of CVC in vivo, the present study has identified its anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro. Since not only the inhibition of viral replication but also the control of excessive immune activation is mandatory to save COVID-19 patients at the late stage of the disease, CVC should be further pursued for its potential in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The data of CVC and RDV represent mean ± range for two separate experiments and mean ± standard deviation for three separate experiments, respectively. Immunomodulatory therapy for the management of severe COVID-19. Beyond the anti-viral therapy: a comprehensive review TAK-652 inhibits CCR5-mediated human immunodeficiency virustype 1 infection in vitro and has favorable pharmacokinetics in humans The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe covid-19 Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 released from alveolar macrophages mediates the systemic inflammation of acute alveolar hypoxia Remdesivir, lopinavir, emetine, and homoharringtonine inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro Targeting monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 signaling in disease Coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) current status and future perspectives: a narrative review A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cenicriviroc for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with fibrosis Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe covid-19 Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a literature review The COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive review of taxonomy, genetics, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control Enhanced isolation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2-expressing cells Rapid and automated tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay for the detection of anti-HIV compounds A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 2b study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of tropifexor and cenicriviroc in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis: Study design of the TANDEM trial A review of the safety of favipiravir -a potential treatment in the COVID-19 pandemic? Development of genetic diagnostic methods for novel voronavirus Cenicriviroc for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro Maraviroc: a review of its use in HIV infection and beyond Recent developments in CCR2 antagonists Transcriptomic characteristics of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in COVID-19 patients The pathogenesis and treatment of the `Cytokine Storm' in COVID-19 We thank National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition and National Institute of Infectious Diseases for kindly providing VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells and SARS-CoV-2 (WK-521 strain), respectively. Kagoshima University is applying for a patent of CVC as a SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor, and M.O., M.T. and M.B. are its inventors.