id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
doi-org-1330		Using the Harvesting Method to Submit ETDs into ProQuest | Information Technology and Libraries			.html	text/html	651	77	41	The following case study describes an academic library's recent experience implementing the harvesting method to submit electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) into the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database (PQDT). In this lesser-known approach, ETDs are deposited first in the institutional repository (IR), where they get processed, to be later harvested for free by ProQuest through the IR's Open Archives Initiative (OAI) feed. (West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2017), 200-04, https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316661 Donna O'Malley, June 27, 2017, reply to Andrew Wesolek, "ETD Embargoes through ProQuest," Digital Commons Google Users Group (blog), https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/digitalcommons/embargo$20proquest%7Csort:date/digitalcommons/Gadwi8INfgA/sg7de7SdCAAJ. Clement and Fred Rascoe, "ETD Management & Publishing in the ProQuest System and the University Repository: A Comparative Analysis," Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 1, no. "PQDT Global Submission Options, Institutional Repository + Harvesting," ProQuest, https://media2.proquest.com/documents/dissertations-submissionsguide.pdf. "PQDT Submissions Options for Universities," ProQuest, http://contentz.mkt5049.com/lp/43888/382619/PQDTsubmissionsguide_0.pdf. 4/5 (2014): 398–404, https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-09-2013-0093.	./cache/doi-org-1330.html	./txt/doi-org-1330.txt