id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_sgbsm5wojrhj3iw5ke554ztify	Arturo Fontaine	The Philosophy of Arthur C. Danto	2015	5	.pdf	application/pdf	3714	265	68	as Writer'); and—a particularly unusual and enticing feature—Sean Scully's reaction to Danto's interpretation of his paintings ('From an Artist's Point of for anyone interested in Danto's philosophy or contemporary art criticism in general.2 Central to many concern for Danto himself—is the fundamental question of what makes a thing into art. where W is the work of art; and I is the interpretation, a function that maps a meaning M onto the Media, and Money')— Danto asserts that 'interpretative hypotheses are constrained by the historical situation in which the work was made' (189). 15 Danto, The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art, 66. Dickie, in his essay 'Art and Ontology', challenges Danto's theory of interpretation, as well as of Danto's necessary conditions for a work of art. So, if Danto is right, we look at Manet's painting interposing later theories of art, and, having misinterpreted to Danto's historical theory of interpretation, all of C. Danto's Art 	./cache/work_sgbsm5wojrhj3iw5ke554ztify.pdf	./txt/work_sgbsm5wojrhj3iw5ke554ztify.txt