id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_f4cjrxsiwre3xdf5rdzw5wv5na	James E. Cutting	Mere Exposure and Aesthetic Realism: A Response to Bence Nanay	2017	5	.pdf	application/pdf	2205	169	65	MERE EXPOSURE AND AESTHETIC REALISM Keywords: aesthetic realism, aesthetic antirealism, canons, mere exposure correct in that a general force of Impressionism and its Canon (Cutting, 2006), and more particularly its results by Meskin, Phelan, Moore and Kieran (2013) limit my conclusions; and that mere exposure Mere Exposure as One among Many Aesthetic Effects Nanay is also off base in thinking my view is that mere exposure is the dominant factor in canon In showing potential limits to my results, Nanay writes that "one could argue that the mere exposure endorse the general idea of Meskin et al.: Mere exposure might work differently for "good" art than Nanay makes a distinction between mere-exposure-effect tokens (MEE-tokens) and MEE-types, almost all mere exposure experiments, per se, are about MEE-tokens, at least as I would define Wollheim (1987) and Wölfflin aside, I think my art exposure experiments are about tokens, "Perceptual learning, the mere exposure effect and aesthetic antirealism," 	./cache/work_f4cjrxsiwre3xdf5rdzw5wv5na.pdf	./txt/work_f4cjrxsiwre3xdf5rdzw5wv5na.txt