Harm principle - Wikipedia Harm principle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to navigation Jump to search Part of a series on Liberalism History Age of Enlightenment List of liberal theorists (contributions to liberal theory) Ideas Civil and political rights Cultural liberalism Democracy Democratic capitalism Economic freedom Economic liberalism Egalitarianism Free market Free trade Freedom of the press Freedom of religion Freedom of speech Gender equality Harm principle Internationalism Laissez-faire Liberty Market economy Natural and legal rights Negative/positive liberty Non-aggression Principle Open society Permissive society Private property Rule of law Secularism Separation of church and state Social contract Welfare state Schools of thought Anarcho-capitalism Classical liberalism Radical liberalism Left-libertarianism Geolibertarianism Right-libertarianism Conservative liberalism Democratic liberalism Green liberalism Liberal autocracy Liberal Catholicism Liberal conservatism Liberal feminism Equity feminism Liberal internationalism Liberal nationalism Liberal socialism Social democracy Muscular liberalism Neoliberalism National liberalism Ordoliberalism Radical centrism Religious liberalism Christian Islamic Jewish Secular liberalism Social liberalism Technoliberalism Third Way Whiggism People Acton Alain Alberdi Alembert Arnold Aron Badawi Barante Bastiat Bentham Berlin Beveridge Bobbio Brentano Bright Broglie Burke Čapek Cassirer Chicherin Chu Chydenius Clinton Cobden Collingdood Condorcet Constant Croce Cuoco Dahrendorf Decy Dewey Dickens Diderot Dongsun Dunoyer Dworkin Einaudi Emerson Eötvös Flach Friedman Galbraith Garrison George Gladstone Gobetti Gomes Gray Green Gu Guizot Hayek Herbert Hobbes Hobhouse Hobson Holbach Hu Humboldt Jefferson Jubani Kant Kelsen Kemal Keynes Korais Korwin-Mikke Kymlicka Lamartine Larra Lecky Li Lincoln Locke Lufti Macaulay Madariaga Madison Martineau Masani Michelet Mill (father) Mill (son) Milton Mises Molteno Mommsen Money Montalembert Montesquieu Mora Mouffe Naoroji Naumann Nozick Nussbaum Obama Ohlin Ortega Paine Paton Popper Price Priestley Prieto Quesnay Qin Ramírez Rathenau Rawls Raz Renan Renouvier Renzi Ricardo Röpke Rorthy Rosmini Rosselli Rousseau Ruggiero Sarmiento Say Sen Earl of Shaftesbury Shklar Sidney Sieyès Şinasi Sismondi Smith Soto Polar Spencer Spinoza Staël Sumner Tahtawi Tao Thierry Thorbecke Thoreau Tocqueville Tracy Troeltsch Turgot Villemain Voltaire Ward Weber Wollstonecraft Zambrano Organizations Africa Liberal Network Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party Arab Liberal Federation Council of Asian Liberals and Democrats European Democratic Party European Liberal Youth European Party for Individual Liberty International Alliance of Libertarian Parties International Federation of Liberal Youth Liberal International Liberal Network for Latin America Liberal parties Liberal South East European Network Regional variants Europe Latin America Albania Armenia Australia Austria Belgium Bolivia Brazil Bulgaria Canada China Chile Colombia Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech lands Denmark Ecuador Egypt Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Iran Israel Italy Japan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Mexico Moldova Montenegro Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Nigeria Norway Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Senegal Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain South Africa South Korea Sweden Switzerland Thailand Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom United States Arizona School Classical Modern Uruguay Venezuela Zimbabwe Related topics Bias in academia Bias in the media  Liberalism portal  Politics portal v t e The harm principle holds that the actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to other individuals. John Stuart Mill articulated this principle in On Liberty, where he argued that "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."[1] An equivalent was earlier stated in France's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of 1789 as, "Liberty consists in the freedom to do everything which injures no one else; hence the exercise of the natural rights of each man has no limits except those which assure to the other members of the society the enjoyment of the same rights. These limits can only be determined by law." Contents 1 Definition 2 Broader definitions of harm 3 Modern examples 3.1 In US libertarianism 3.2 Critique of Harm Principle 4 See also 5 References 6 Bibliography 7 External links Definition[edit] The belief "that no one should be forcibly prevented from acting in any way he chooses provided his acts are not invasive of the free acts of others" has become one of the basic principles of libertarian politics.[2] The harm principle was first fully articulated by the English philosopher John Stuart Mill (1806–1873) in the first chapter of On Liberty (1859),[1] where he argued that: The object of this Essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control, whether the means used be physical force in the form of legal penalties, or the moral coercion of public opinion. That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinion of others, to do so would be wise, or even right... The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign. — John Stuart Mill[3] Even if a self-regarding action results in harm to oneself, it is still beyond the sphere of justifiable state coercion. Harm itself is not a non-moral concept. The infliction of harm upon another person is what makes an action wrong.[4] Harm can also result from a failure to meet an obligation. Morality generates obligations. Duty may be exacted from a person in the same way as a debt, and it is part of the notion of duty that a person may be rightfully compelled to fulfill it.[3][4] Broader definitions of harm[edit] In the same essay, Mill further explains the principle as a function of two maxims: The maxims are, first, that the individual is not accountable to society for his actions, in so far as these concern the interests of no person but himself. Advice, instruction, persuasion, and avoidance by other people, if thought necessary by them for their own good, are the only measures by which society can justifiably express its dislike or disapprobation of his conduct. Secondly, that for such actions as are prejudicial to the interests of others, the individual is accountable, and may be subjected either to social or to legal punishments, if society is of opinion that the one or the other is requisite for its protection. (LV2) The second of these maxims has become known as the social authority principle.[5] However, the second maxim also opens the question of broader definitions of harm, up to and including harm to the society. The concept of harm is not limited to harm to another individual but can be harm to individuals plurally, without specific definition of those individuals. This is an important principle for the purpose of determining harm that only manifests gradually over time—such that the resulting harm can be anticipated, but does not yet exist at the time that the action causing harm was taken. It also applies to other issues—which range from the right of an entity to discharge broadly polluting waste on private property, to broad questions of licensing, and to the right of sedition. Modern examples[edit] The examples and perspective in this section deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this section, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new section, as appropriate. (February 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In US libertarianism[edit] The United States Libertarian Party includes a version of the harm principle as part of its official party platform. It states: Criminal laws should be limited in their application to violations of the rights of others through force or fraud, or to deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Therefore, we favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims . . .[6] Critique of Harm Principle[edit] Scholars[who?] have argued that the harm principle doesn't provide a narrow scope of which actions count as harmful towards oneself or the population and it cannot be used to determine whether people can be punished for their actions by the state. A state can determine whether an action is punishable by determining what harm the action causes. If a morally unjust action occurs but leaves no indisputable form of harm, there is no justification for the state to act and punish the perpetrator for their actions.[7] The harm principle has an ambiguous definition of what harm specifically is and what justifies a state to intervene.[7] Scholars[who?] have also said that the harm principle does not specify on whether the state is justified with intervention tactics. This ambiguity can lead to a state defining what counts as a harmful self-regarding action at their own discretion. This freedom might allow for an individual's own liberty and rights to be in danger. It would not be plausible for a state to intervene with an action that will negatively affect the population more than an individual.[8] The harm principle scope of usage has been described as too wide to directly follow and implement possible punishment by a state.[8] See also[edit] Ahimsa Classical liberalism Primum non nocere - "first, to do no harm." Law of equal liberty Libertarianism Non-aggression principle Wiccan Rede References[edit] ^ a b "Freedom of Speech". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 17 April 2008. Retrieved 10 June 2013. ^ Hamowy, Ronald, ed. (2008). The Encyclopaedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. p. xxi. ISBN 978-1412965804. ^ a b Mill, John Stuart (1859). On Liberty. Oxford, England: Oxford University. pp. 21–22. Retrieved February 27, 2008. ^ a b Menezes Oliveira, Jorge (2012). "Harm and Offence in Mill's Conception of Liberty". Oxford, England: University of Oxford. p. 13. ^ Rossi, Philip J. (2012). The Social Authority of Reason. Albany, New York: SUNY Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0791483367. ^ "2016 Platform". Libertarian National Committee. 2016. Retrieved 25 February 2017. ^ a b Stewart, Hamish (2009-08-23). "The Limits of the Harm Principle". Criminal Law and Philosophy. 4 (1): 17–35. doi:10.1007/s11572-009-9082-9. ISSN 1871-9791. S2CID 144027938. ^ a b Saunders, Ben (2016-08-30). "Reformulating Mill's Harm Principle". Mind. 125 (500): 1005–1032. doi:10.1093/mind/fzv171. ISSN 0026-4423. Bibliography[edit] Feinberg, Joel (1984). The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. London, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0199878574. External links[edit] Baselines, at Legal Theory Blog. "Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy". Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy: 3.6 The Harm Principle. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018. v t e Libertarianism Origins Age of Enlightenment Anarchism Aristotelianism Liberalism Schools Libertarian capitalism (Right-libertarianism) Anarcho-capitalism Autarchism Christian libertarianism Conservative libertarianism Consequentialist libertarianism Fusionism Libertarian transhumanism Minarchism Natural-rights libertarianism Neo-classical liberalism Paleolibertarianism Propertarianism Voluntaryism Libertarian socialism (Left-libertarianism) Anarchism Collectivist Free-market Agorism Left-wing laissez-faire Left-wing market Green Individualist Insurrectionary Libertarian communism Mutualism Pan- Philosophical Social Autonomism Bleeding-heart libertarianism Communalism Geolibertarianism Georgism Green libertarianism Guild socialism Liberalism Classical Radical Libertarian Marxism Participism Revolutionary syndicalism Concepts Anti-authoritarianism Anti-capitalism Antimilitarism Anti-statism Argumentation ethics Class struggle Communes Counter-economics Crypto-anarchism Decentralization Departurism Direct action Economic democracy Economic freedom Egalitarianism Evictionism Expropriative anarchism Federalism (anarchist) Free association (Marxism and anarchism) Free love Free market Free-market environmentalism Free migration Free trade Freedom of association Freedom of contract Global Justice Movement Gift economy Homestead principle Illegalism Individualism Individual reclamation Liberty Localism Natural and legal rights Night-watchman state Non-aggression principle Non-voting Participatory economics Polycentric law Private defense agency Propaganda of the deed Property is theft Really Really Free Market Refusal of work Restorative justice Self-governance Self-ownership Single tax Social ecology Spontaneous order Squatting Stateless society Tax resistance Title-transfer theory of contract Voluntary society Workers' councils Workers' self-management People Stephen Pearl Andrews Mikhail Bakunin Frédéric Bastiat Walter Block Murray Bookchin Jason Brennan Bryan Caplan Kevin Carson Frank Chodorov Noam Chomsky Grover Cleveland Calvin Coolidge Voltairine de Cleyre Joseph Déjacque Ralph Waldo Emerson David D. Friedman Milton Friedman Mahatma Gandhi Henry George William Godwin Emma Goldman Barry Goldwater David Graeber William Batchelder Greene Daniel Hannan Friedrich Hayek Auberon Herbert Karl Hess Thomas Hodgskin Hans-Hermann Hoppe Michael Huemer Penn Jillette Gary Johnson Stephan Kinsella Samuel Edward Konkin III Janusz Korwin-Mikke Étienne de La Boétie Rose Wilder Lane David Leyonhjelm Roderick T. Long Lord Acton Tibor Machan Wendy McElroy Ludwig von Mises Gustave de Molinari Albert Jay Nock Robert Nozick Isabel Paterson Ron Paul Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Ralph Raico Ayn Rand Leonard Read Murray Rothbard Joseph Schumpeter Chris Matthew Sciabarra Julian Simon Herbert Spencer Lysander Spooner Max Stirner John Stossel Thomas Szasz Henry David Thoreau Leo Tolstoy Benjamin Tucker Josiah Warren Issues Anarcho-capitalism and minarchism Criticism Intellectual property Internal debates LGBT rights Objectivism Political parties Theories of law Books Anarchy, State, and Utopia Atlas Shrugged For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto Free to Choose Law, Legislation and Liberty The Market for Liberty Related Anti-collectivism Anti-communism Anti-fascism Anti-socialism Austro-libertarianism Center for Libertarian Studies Civil libertarianism Classical liberalism Constitutionalism Economic liberalism Fusionism Green libertarianism Libertarian conservatism Libertarian socialism Libertarian Democrat Libertarian Republican Libertarian science fiction Libertarianism in South Africa Libertarianism in the United Kingdom Libertarianism in the United States Objectivism Public choice theory Small government Technolibertarianism Libertarianism portal Outline of libertarianism Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harm_principle&oldid=997818340" Categories: Classical liberalism Ethical principles 1859 introductions John Stuart Mill Hidden categories: Use Oxford spelling from August 2016 Articles with limited geographic scope from February 2019 Pages in non-existent country centric categories All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from March 2020 Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Article Talk Variants Views Read Edit View history More Search Navigation Main page Contents Current events Random article About Wikipedia Contact us Donate Contribute Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Cite this page Wikidata item Print/export Download as PDF Printable version Languages العربية বাংলা Български فارسی Français 한국어 ქართული Magyar Nederlands 日本語 Português Svenska Türkçe Edit links This page was last edited on 2 January 2021, at 11:05 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement