id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_zkjiovzs2jdnhibamfo2mxgc7q	Rita Floyd	Parallels with the hate speech debate: the pros and cons of criminalising harmful securitising requests	2017	43	.pdf	application/pdf	13129	710	48	Floyd, R 2017, 'Parallels with the hate speech debate: the pros and cons of criminalising harmful securitising This article argues that harmful and derogatory securitising requests targeting affected, are legal protections against harmful and offensive securitising requests justified? securitisation, hate speech, PEGIDA, Muhammad cartoon crisis, harm, Islamophobia, securitising requests that are harmful and derogatory to racial, ethnic, or religious minorities against specific kinds of harmful and offensive securitising requests justified? when, in addition to a relevant audience accepting a securitising request, security measures on the ethics of speaking security commences from a focus on securitising requests as The case for protections against harmful and offensive securitising requests securitising requests of the first kind resemble hate speech closely. response because securitising requests (i.e. security speech) does not in fact cause factual or Given that everyone can speak security by requesting securitisation, we can say that 	./cache/work_zkjiovzs2jdnhibamfo2mxgc7q.pdf	./txt/work_zkjiovzs2jdnhibamfo2mxgc7q.txt