id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_pvwj55bxp5axpagtzl66mrr6ei	Peter DeScioli	The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment	2016	5	.pdf	application/pdf	3977	502	44	they do not explain moral judgment — why humans compute the wrongness of actions, announce moral judgments, condemn other people's violations, and debate People then announce their moral evaluations, argue about the wrongness of actions, and show A well-known example is people's judgments that it is morally wrong to kill one person In the arena of human conflict, moral judgment is a moral judgment against opponents, and for avoiding prohibited actions to escape the wrath of condemners. Moral judgment offers a third strategy for choosing sides moral judgment to choose the same side while also Proposes the side-taking theory for moral judgment. The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment DeScioli 27 The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment DeScioli 27 The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment The side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment Moral judgment as a side-taking strategy Moral judgment as a side-taking strategy	./cache/work_pvwj55bxp5axpagtzl66mrr6ei.pdf	./txt/work_pvwj55bxp5axpagtzl66mrr6ei.txt