id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
aristotle-prior-2443		aristotle-prior-2443			.txt	text/plain	48512	2250	70	then that in universal attribution the terms of the negative premiss the terms animal, man, horse; of a universal negative relation, the possible with a universal negative minor premiss. syllogism in this figure with a particular conclusion, the terms a particular negative syllogism must result whenever the middle term be negative, and let the major premiss be universal, e.g. let M belong S. Terms for the universal affirmative relation are animate, man, In particular syllogisms, if the universal premiss is necessary, premiss BC be both particular and necessary, and let A belong to all will be a perfect syllogism to prove that A may possibly belong to all It is clear that if the terms are universal in possible premisses negative premiss is necessary, a syllogism is always possible, proving conclusion is possible when the universal premiss is true, and the first figure; but a negative syllogism is possible whether the terms	./cache/aristotle-prior-2443.txt	./txt/aristotle-prior-2443.txt