id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_s3ynbyxlb5gmjj7xjknzyb4mpe	Abbas Husain	Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion	2020.0	10	.pdf	application/pdf	6204	764	50	Results: We discussed consensus guidelines for evaluation and promotion of digital scholarship with the intent to included the following: demonstrate scholarship criteria; provide external evidence of impact; and include digital peerreview roles. As traditional scholarship continues to evolve within the digital realm, academic medicine should adapt Conclusion: P&T committees can critically appraise the quality and impact of digital scholarship using specific, Summary of metrics used to demonstrate digital scholarship impact, role and quality, with a sample scholarly work. Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Husain et al. Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Husain et al. Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Husain et al. Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Husain et al. Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion	./cache/work_s3ynbyxlb5gmjj7xjknzyb4mpe.pdf	./txt/work_s3ynbyxlb5gmjj7xjknzyb4mpe.txt