id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_jpkzqd4svvfgbeoc7v4etzqiem	Bonnie Robinson	Encouraging Digital Scholarly Publishing in the Humanities	2017.0	29	.pdf	application/pdf	9308	829	57	innovative peer review processes to support digital publishing. Initial survey results indicated that presses use the same peer review process for both digital and print  Scholars value the current peer review process in terms of improving the manuscript's quality commercial presses, since "peer review is a default to promotion and tenure committees." So publishers Our survey to press directors revealed that publishers use the same peer review process for digital as for By identifying potential concerns and new possibilities in peer review and digital publishing, our project  Has digital publishing increased the usefulness of peer reviewed shorter forms of scholarship, the peer review process, digital publishing, and the role of academic presses. Presses and universities/academic institutions have much in common, in terms of valuing peer review of digital born scholarship/open access material for collaborating presses, universities, libraries: Brand University Press Faculty Boards are often overlooked, especially in terms of the peer review process.	./cache/work_jpkzqd4svvfgbeoc7v4etzqiem.pdf	./txt/work_jpkzqd4svvfgbeoc7v4etzqiem.txt