A review of the monotypic genus Chilelimnophila Alexander (Diptera: Tipulomorpha: Limoniidae) A review of the monotypic genus Chilelimnophila Alexander (Diptera: Tipulomorpha: Limoniidae) Guilherme Cunha Ribeiro1 AbsTRACT A review of the monotypic genus Chilelimnophila Alexander (Diptera: Tipulomorpha: Limoniidae). The Chilean species Chilelimnophila lyra (Alexander, 1952), the only included species in the genus Chilelimnophila Alexander, 1968, is redescribed on the basis of new available material from adjacencies of the type locality and other areas. Misinterpretations from the original description are corrected. Adult anatomical structures are described and illustrated in detail, including information on the previously unknown female. Better grounds for the recognition of the taxon are provided. Keywords: Chilelimnophila lyra, crane flies, taxonomy, Chile, Neotropical Region. ability of more specimens from Chiloé Island without indicating how many and did not add substantive information on the species morphology. During a research visit by the author to the National Museum of Natural History of the Smith‑ sonian Institution, Washington DC, USA (USNM) in 2004, an effort of examining samples of undeter‑ mined Chilean crane flies in the Alexander Collec‑ tion resulted in the finding of additional material of Chilelimnophila lyra. These specimens, coming from two different localities (including a locality adjacent to Curacautín, the type locality), add considerably to the number of known specimens of this inter‑ esting and poorly known species. These specimens allow for a redescription of the taxon, with a study on its morphology which is more detailed than those by Alexander (1952, 1968). This redescription is aimed to provide better grounds for the recognition of Chilelimnophila (and its single included species). InTRoDuCTIon Alexander (1952), described Limnophila lyra from Chile, referring to a single specimen from Cura‑ cautín (Malleco Province) designated as the holotype. Alexander (1952) considered this fly as a very distinc‑ tive species. Its original placement in Limnophila was admittedly provisional as the distinctive morphology of the antenna and male terminalia would require the erection of a new higher group for it. Alexander (1968) then erected for the inclusion of Limnophila lyra the genus Chilelimnophila. The heterogeneity and artificiality of Limnophila has been previously recognized by Alexander (e.g., Alexander, 1924, 1929), and the proposal of a monotypic genus for this distinctive species seemed fully justified. A more rigorous demonstration of Limnophila para‑ phyly (Ribeiro, 2006a; Ribeiro, 2007) corroborates this decision. Alexander (1968) mentioned the avail‑ Volume 47(18):203-211, 2007 Departamento de Biologia (FFCLRP), Universidade de São Paulo. Avenida Bandeirantes, 3900, 14040‑901, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil. E‑mail: ribeirogc@hotmail.com 1. It may also be useful in the eventual discovery of new taxa related to C. lyra, and for future comparative studies. MATeRIAL AnD MeThoDs The studied specimens belong to the Alexan‑ der Collection of Crane Flies housing at USNM. Descriptive terminology follows McAlpine (1981) for most characters. The adopted terminology for the wing veins is shown in Figure 5. The terminology for the structures of the male gonostylus is in accordance with Ribeiro (2006b). Dissections of the head, thorax, male and female terminalia were cleared in warmed KOH and mounted for study in non‑permanent slides with glycerol. After study and illustration the dissected structures were transferred to microvials with glycerol and pinned with their corresponding specimens. Illustrations were made with a drawing tube attached to a com‑ pound microscope. Measurements were taken with an ocular reticule. Photographs were taken with a digi‑ tal photography system attached to both stereoscopic and compound microscopes. Details on the examined specimens are as follows (label information in italics; information of different labels separated by a verti‑ cal line; precise information on locality within square brackets): Holotype: Male. Chile, Curacautín, Dec. 14. 50, Peña. (pin label); Chile-Malleco, Curacautín, 400 m, XII-14, 50 (Luis E. Peña) (slide label) [Chile, Malleco, Cura‑ cautín, ca. 38°27’S 71°53’W]. Preservation. Pinned parts: head with left antenna; thorax with both midlegs and right hindleg. Slide mounted parts: right antenna; wings; 2 legs; abdo‑ men; terminalia. Non-type specimens identified by Charles Paul Alex- ander: 1 male (pinned with terminalia mounted in slide) and 1 female (pinned). Chile, Arauco, Nahuel- buta, Butamalal, 1100-1400 m, I-23-31 ‘54, Peña. | Chilelimnophila lyra Al. Det. C.P. Alexander [Chile, Arauco, Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, Butamalal, ca. 37°54’S 73°12’W]; 2 males (pinned with terminalia mounted in slide). Chile, Arauco, Nahuelbuta, Pichi- nahuel, 1100-1400 m, I-23/31 ‘54, Peña. | Chilelim- nophila lyra Al. Det. C.P. Alexander [Chile, Arauco, Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, Pichinahuel, ca. 37°47’S 73°02’W]; 3 males (mounted in slide). Chilelim- nophila lyra (Alex), Chile, Chiloe I. Dalcahue, Feb. 1954, (L.E. Peña) [Chile, Chiloé Island, Dalcahue, ca. 42°23’S 73°40’W]. Note: Only the specimens from Chiloé Island were referred to by Alexander (1968), who erroneously indicated them as having being collected in 1945. Specimens found in the USNM collection: 12 males and 2 females. CHILE: Curacautín, Rio Blanco, 12-20 January, 1959 | Chilelimnophila lyra Alex., G C Ribeiro det 2007 [Chile, Malleco, Curacautín, Rio Blanco, ca. 38°27’S 71°53’W]; 9 males. CHILE: Cord. Nahuel- buta, Pichinahuel, 1-10 Jan. 1959 | Chilelimnophila lyra Alex., G C Ribeiro det 2007 [Chile, Arauco, Cordillera de Nahuelbuta, Pichinahuel, ca. 37°47’S 73°02’W]. Note: The labels of these specimens do not include information on collector. Basing on the collecting date and localities, it can be assumed that the collector was L.E. Peña (Oliver Flint, personal communication). Genus Chilelimnophila Alexander, 1968 Chilelimnophila Alexander, 1968: 23. Type species: Limnophila lyra Alexander, 1952. Diagnosis: Chilelimnophila can be recognized by the fol‑ lowing characters combined: first flagellomere ovoid, constricted at base; first three to four flagellomeres partially fused in the male, ovoid and not fused in the female; tibial spurs covered with tiny hairs; clasper of gonostylus glabrous, bifid and with its distalmost branch serrated; lateral process of aedeagal sheath long, narrow and acute, strongly sclerotized, twisted at apex. Chilelimnophila lyra (Alexander, 1952) (Figs. 1‑13) Chilelimnophila lyra (Alexander 1952): 108‑109 (original description); 118, figure 7 (male ter‑ minalia). Alexander (1968): 24, figures 2 (wing) and 7 (male terminalia). Alexander & Alexander (1970): 4.93 (catalogue citation). Oosterbroek (2007) (catalogue citation). Redescription Coloration (male and female): Head brownish yellow, generally darker than thorax; thorax and legs light brown‑yellow; abdomen brownish, darker than tho‑ 204 Ribeiro, G.C.: A review of Chilelimnophila rax, with tergum darker than sternum; last abdominal segment darker than previous segments. Dimensions (male; maximum lengths and widths in millimeters): Head length, 0.40‑0.60; head width, 0.35; wing length, 5.87‑6.25 (5.87 in holotype); wing width, 1.62‑1.70 (1.70 in holotype); gonocoxite length, 0.28‑0.31 (0.28 in holotype); clasper of gono‑ stylus length, 0.21‑0.24 (0.24 in holotype); lobe of gonostylus length, 0.14‑0.17 (0.14 in holotype). FIGuRes 1‑2: Chilelimnophila lyra, male head. 1, lateral view. 2, ventral view. Abbreviations: comp eye, compound eye; lbl, labella; plp, maxillary palpus. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 47(18), 2007 205 Morphology (male and female): Head and append‑ ages (Figures 1‑2, 4‑5): Flagellum 14‑segmented; scape cylindrical, ca. 1.75 X longer than wide; pedicel ovoid, ca. 1.2 X longer than wide; scape and pedicel similar in length; first flagellomere ovoid, constricted at base; first three to four flagellomeres as long as wide and partially fused in the male, ovoid and not fused in the female; flagellomeres length/width ratio gradually increasing toward tip of antenna, with last flagellomere longer than preceding; maxillary palpus 4‑segmented; first palpomere more or less cylindrical, ca. 2.2 X longer than wide; other palpomeres ovoid, shorter than the first; compound yes widely separated dorsally, meeting at median line ventrally; rostrum (including labella) ca. 0.4 X the length of head cap‑ sule. Thorax (Figure 3): almost as long as high; pleural sclerites as figured. Leg (Figure 8): tibial spurs (1:2:2) ca. 0.66 X the width of distal part of tibia, covered with tiny hairs; tarsal claws simple, smooth. Wing (Figure 6): h vein situated between the origin and the fork of M+Cu; Sc ending on C at the level of bifurca‑ tion of Rs and A1; position of sc‑r variable, more or less near the tip of Sc; r‑r linking R1 to R2 faint or lack‑ ing; Rs almost straight, originating well proximally to the level of the tip of A2; Rs three branched; R2+3 ca. 0.46 X the length of R3; R2 running more or less FIGuRe 3: Chilelimnophila lyra, male thorax, lateral view. Abbreviations: anepm, anepimeron; anepst, anepisternum; anepst cleft, anepi‑ sternal cleft; aprn, antepronotum; cerv scl, cervical sclerite; cx, coxa; kepm, katepimeron; kepst, katepisternum; ltg, laterotergite; mtepm, metaepimeron; mtkepst, metakatepisternum; mtanepst, metanepisternum; mr, meron; mtg, mediotergite; pltr2, mesothoracic pleu‑ rotrochantin; pltr3, metathoracic pleurotrochantin; pprn, postpronotum; sct, scutum; sctl, scutellum. 206 Ribeiro, G.C.: A review of Chilelimnophila parallel to R3 in most of its length, turning upwards abruptly at tip; section of R4+5 between its origin and point of contact with r‑m curved; section of R4+5 dis‑ tal to point of contact with r‑m almost straight; r‑m straight, similar to m‑cu in length; M four branched; M1+2 long, ca. 3 X the length of M2; M1 ca. 1.37 X the length of M2; M3 sinuous; M4 almost straight; m‑m ca. 0.20 to 0.40 X the length of r‑m; m‑cu attached to M3+4 near mid‑length of discal cell; A1 almost straight; A2 slightly curved at tip. Male terminalia (Figures 7, 9, 10‑12): posterior margin of tergite 9 produced into two small lobes; gonocoxite conical, gradually narrowed toward tip, bearing a ventromedial exten‑ sion; gonostylus terminal; lobe of gonostylus ca. 3.25 X longer than wide, gradually narrowed toward tip; clasper of gonostylus ca. 5.6 X longer than wide, gla‑ brous, bifid (largest and distalmost bifurcation ser‑ rated); aedeagus relatively long, reaching the level the gonostylus insertion; lateral process of aedeagal sheath long, narrow and acute, strongly sclerotized, twisted at apex; interbase blade‑like, rounded at apex, bearing a stout lateral extension articulating with paramere, and FIGuRes 4‑5: Chilelimnophila lyra, antenna. 4, proximal part of male antenna, showing partial fusion of first four flagellomeres (I‑IV). 5, proximal part of female antenna. Abbreviations: ped, pedicel. FIGuRe 6: Chilelimnophila lyra, wig venation. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 47(18), 2007 207 a longer, more slender medial extension. Female ter‑ minalia (Figure 13): tenth tergite ovoid, ca. 2 X lon‑ ger than ninth tergite; hypogynial valve with a more or less ovoid and less sclerotized internal area rang‑ ing from its midlength to its apex; apex of hypogynial valve reaching midlength of cercus, bearing slender bristle‑like filaments. Pilosity: antenna with verticils longer than individual flagellomeres; wing with mac‑ rotrichia all along longitudinal veins. Remarks: The rounded structure indicated by Alexan‑ der (1952: 118, figure 7; 1968: 24, figure 7) as the ninth tergite is actually the ninth sternite: the poste‑ rior margin of the ninth tergite is not rounded, but produced into two small lobes. The three dimensional structure of the clasper of gonostylus is relatively com‑ plex. Although some variation may occur in the rela‑ tive lengths of its two apical extensions, in flattened slide mounted specimens (Figure 9), the apex of the clasper may be distorted in different ways, giving a false impression of variation. Such a distortion has probably driven Alexander’s (1968: 23) description of the apical part of this structure as “expanded into a triangular blade”. Sexual dimorphism is noticeable in structure of the antenna. In the male, the first three to four flagellomeres are partially fused (Figure 4), while in the female, they are more ovoid than in male and not fused (Figure 5). Distribution: As far as known, Chilelimnophila lyra has a restricted geographical distribution in Chile, rang‑ ing latitudinaly from ca. 37°S (northernmost limit at the Cordillera de Nahuelbuta) to 42°S (southernmost limit at Chiloé Island) within the Subantarctic Bio‑ geographical Province in South America. ResuMo Revisão do gênero monotípico Chilelimnophila Alexander (Diptera: Tipulomorpha: Limoniidae). Chilelimnophila lyra (Alexander, 1952), a única espécie FIGuRe 7: Chilelimnophila lyra, photograph of male terminalia, dorsal view. Abbreviations: aed, aedeagus; cgonst, clasper of gonostylus; goncx, gonocoxite; interb, interbase; lgonst, lobe of gonostylus; lp, lateral process of aedeagal sheath; pm, paramere; t9, ninth tergite. 208 Ribeiro, G.C.: A review of Chilelimnophila FIGuRe 8‑9: Chilelimnophila lyra, male. 8, articulation of tibia with tarsus (foreleg) showing tibial spur (arrow). 9, dorsal aspect of gono‑ stylus in flattened, permanent slide mounted specimen. Abbreviations: cgonst, clasper of gonostylus; lgonst, lobe of gonostylus. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 47(18), 2007 209 FIGuRes 10‑12: Chilelimnophila lyra, male terminalia. 10, general aspect of terminalia, dorsal view. 11, aedeagus and associated struc‑ tures, dorsal view. 12, general aspect of terminalia, lateral view. Abbreviations: aed, aedeagus; aed apod, aedeagus apodeme; cgonst, clasper of gonostylus; goncx, gonocoxite; interb, interbase; lgonst, lobe of gonostylus; lp, lateral process of aedeagal sheath; pm, paramere; s9, ninth sternite; t9, ninth tergite. 210 Ribeiro, G.C.: A review of Chilelimnophila do gênero Chilelimnophila Alexander, 1968, do Chile, é redescrita com base em novos espécimes de áreas próximas à localidade tipo e outras áreas. Interpretações incorretas da descrição original são corrigidas. As estruturas anatômicas do imago são descritas e ilustradas em detalhe, incluindo informações sobre as fêmeas, até então desconhecidas. Melhores subsídios para o reconhecimento do táxon são fornecidos. Palavras‑chave: Chilelimnophila lyra, taxonomia, Chile, Região Neotropical. ACknowLeDGeMenTs I thank Dr. Wayne Mathis for supporting my research at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, and for the loan of several specimens used in this study. During the early phases of this study, I was financially supported by a PhD fellowship by FAPESP (grant # 02/13613‑6). My research visit to the National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC was supported by a fellow‑ ship from CAPES. By the time this paper was sent for publication, I was financially supported by a Post‑ Doc Fellowship by FAPESP (grant # 07/50696‑0). ReFeRenCes Alexander, C.P. 1924. New of little‑known Tipulidae (Diptera). XXI. Australasian species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9(13):359‑380. Alexander, C.P. 1929. Diptera of Patagonia and South Chile. Part I. Crane‑flies (Tipulidae, Trichoceridae, Tanyderidae). British Museum Natural History, London, p. 1‑240. Alexander, C.P. 1952. New or insufficiently‑known crane‑ flies from Chile (Family Tipulidae, Order Diptera). Part IV. Agricultura Técnica, 11:99‑118. Alexander, C.P. 1968. New or little‑known Tipulidae from Chile and Peru (Diptera: Tipulidae). Revista Chilena de Entomología, 6:21‑36. Alexander, C.P. & Alexander, M.M. 1970. 4. Family Tipulidae. In: Departamento de Zoologia, Secretaria da Agriculatura do Estado de São Paulo, A Catalogue of the Diptera of the Americas South of the United States, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, p. 4.1‑4.259. McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology – adults. In: McAlpine, J. F.; Peterson, B.V.; Shewell, G.E.; Teskey, H.J.; Vockeroth, J.R. & Wood, D.M. (Coordinators), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 1. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Monograph 27, p. 9‑63. Oosterbroek, P. 2007. Catalogue of the Craneflies of the World (Insecta, Diptera, Nematocera, Tipuloidea). Available at:< http://ip30.eti.uva.nl/ccw/>. Access in: 2/May/2007. Ribeiro, G.C. 2006a. A cladistic study of the Limnophilinae (Limoniidae) using adult male characters: some light shed on the evolution of Tipulomorpha. In: 6th International Congress of Dipterology. Abstracts, p. 205‑206. Ribeiro, G.C. 2006b. Homology of the gonostylus parts in crane flies, with emphasis on the families Tipulidae and Limoniidae (Diptera, Tipulomorpha). Zootaxa, 1110:47‑57. Ribeiro, G.C. 2007. Filogenia dos Limnophilinae (Limoniidae) e evolução basal dos Tipulomorpha (Diptera). (Dissertação de Mestrado), Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto. Recebido em: 04.05.2007 Aceito em: 03.08.2007 Impresso em: 21.12.2007 FIGuRe 13: Chilelimnophila lyra, female ovipositor. Abbreviations: cerc, cercus; hyp vlv, hypogynial valve; s8, eighth sternite; t8‑10, eighth to tenth tergites. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, 47(18), 2007 211 Se çã o de Pu bl ic aç õe s d o M Z U SP