id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_vs52qr6evnhs5l2bmkcahutxi4	Jose Leal	Cost-effectiveness of digital surveillance clinics with optical coherence tomography versus hospital eye service follow-up for patients with screen-positive maculopathy	2018.0	8	.pdf	application/pdf	5964	566	57	Cost-effectiveness of digital surveillance clinics with optical coherence tomography versus hospital eye service follow-up for patients with screen-positive maculopathy SDOCT imaging in digital surveillance clinics is a cost-effective intervention relative to hospital eye service (HES) followup. Methods We used patient-level data from the Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Service linked to the local digital background diabetic retinopathy (R1) and diabetic maculopathy (M1) following DR screening across the clinic pathways annual cost of assessing and surveillance through the SD-OCT clinic pathway was £101 (95% CI: 91–139) as compared with Conclusions Our analysis shows that SD-OCT surveillance of patients diagnosed as R1M1 at DR screening is not only costeffective but generates considerable cost savings. assess whether the addition of SD-OCT imaging surveillance in a community setting following digital retinal photography is a cost-effective intervention when screening for Secondary NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programme Overview of patient pathway, grading pathway, surveillance pathways and referral pathways 2017.	./cache/work_vs52qr6evnhs5l2bmkcahutxi4.pdf	./txt/work_vs52qr6evnhs5l2bmkcahutxi4.txt