id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_pdki4fybifdqblxwrhto77hw7q	Sandra Umeda Sasaki	An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: single bundle versus anatomical double bundle techniques	2008.0	6	.pdf	application/pdf	2877	290	58	comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: single bundle versus anatomical double bundle techniques. through double bone tunnels in the femur and tibia (anatomical reconstruction). OBJECTIVES: To compare, through biomechanical tests, the practice of anatomical double bundle anterior cruciate ligament CONCLUSION: The technique of anatomical double bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft has a similar biomechanical behavior with regard to anterior tibial dislocation, rigidity, and passive internal biomechanical evaluation of the single bundle ACL technique versus anatomical double bundle reconstruction using cadaveric knees and patellar grafts (with no graft Recently, there has been a tendency towards the "anatomical double bundle reconstruction" technique with four bone CLINICS 2008;63(1):71-6An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction CLINICS 2008;63(1):71-6An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction CLINICS 2008;63(1):71-6An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction anatomical double – bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction	./cache/work_pdki4fybifdqblxwrhto77hw7q.pdf	./txt/work_pdki4fybifdqblxwrhto77hw7q.txt