id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_l3fz6glh4na4vgystepdr5rwfm	Asko Lehmuskallio	Photorealistic computer-generated images are difficult to distinguish from digital photographs: a case study with professional photographers and photo-editors	2018.0	32	.pdf	application/pdf	10030	729	53	Keywords: Computer-generated images; photography; simulation; digital culture; digital image may look just like a photograph when it is published in a newspaper, it actually differs photography is of importance for their professional practice, distinguish digital photographs from taken with a camera, our understanding of the digital photographic image, and of its relations have alone purely computer-generated pictures – and photographic images taken according to a criteria for choosing computer-generated images was that they looked like photographs taken with These results lead clearly to the conclusion that the studied image professionals, who work day-today with photography as photographers and/or editors, are unable to distinguish correctly between An important diagnostic criteria for distinguishing photographs from computer-generated images if a picture shown is a photograph or a computer-generated image. An important set of justifications for deciding if a picture shown was a photograph or a computergenerated image did not deal with iconic or indexical signs, but with more general, symbolic signs. digital photographs and photorealistic computer-generated images.	./cache/work_l3fz6glh4na4vgystepdr5rwfm.pdf	./txt/work_l3fz6glh4na4vgystepdr5rwfm.txt