id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_fyj7u2k3zbe37osnu6p7k2sv3a	P H Scanlon	Comparison of two reference standards in validating two field mydriatic digital photography as a method of screening for diabetic retinopathy	2003.0	7	.pdf	application/pdf	4821	451	54	people with diabetes receiving an ophthalmologist's examination using slit lamp biomicroscopy, seven Results: In comparison with seven field stereophotography, the ophthalmologist's examination gave a examination, two field mydriatic digital photography gave a sensitivity of 82.8% (78.0 to 87.6), specificity 1.5% of the two field digital photographs, and none of the ophthalmologist's examinations were Conclusion: An ophthalmologist's examination compares favourably with seven field stereophotography, retinopathy (Table 1), and the seven field photographs were ophthalmologist's examination result and in the photographic grading of the seven field photographs. N Two field digital photography compared with the ophthalmologist's examination. eyes showed referable features both on seven field stereophotography and the ophthalmologist's examination. seven field stereophotography, in assessable eyes (Table 5) There were eight eyes which the ophthalmologist's examination had classified as referable retinopathy that had been graded as non-referable by seven field stereophotography. retinopathy by seven field stereophotography and the ophthalmologist's examination had classified as non-referable.	./cache/work_fyj7u2k3zbe37osnu6p7k2sv3a.pdf	./txt/work_fyj7u2k3zbe37osnu6p7k2sv3a.txt