id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_dh2dspsrafdztgaebkodjnkt7u	Michael B Pohl	A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography and calliper methods	2010.0	7	.pdf	application/pdf	4350	383	59	A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography and calliper methods Pohl and Farr, A comparison of foot arch measurement reliability using both digital photography Background: Both calliper devices and digital photographic methods have been used to quantify foot arch height Results: The reliability for both the AHIMS and digital photographic methods was excellent with ICC values exceeding Conclusion: Digital photographic methods offer equivalent intra-tester reliability to previously established calliper Therefore, it is difficult to interpret whether the digital photographic method of assessing arch height is as reliable as the equivalent purpose of this study was to compare the intra-tester reliability of determining arch height when using both a calliper device and digital photographic methods. Briefly, this software allowed the digitizing of selected co-ordinates to calculate the foot measurements needed to determine AHI (Figure 3). The intra-tester reliability values for foot arch measurements using both methods are shown in Table 2.	./cache/work_dh2dspsrafdztgaebkodjnkt7u.pdf	./txt/work_dh2dspsrafdztgaebkodjnkt7u.txt