id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_5vp4zqhcbbb5dms5epqqod7qmu	Tháıs de Sous Pereira	A Comparative Study of Clinical vs. Digital Exophthalmometry Measurement Methods	2020.0	6	.pdf	application/pdf	3422	457	54	In this study we compare two exophthalmometry measurement methods (digital photography and clinical) with regard to reproducibility and the level of correlation and agreement with measurements Patients underwent orbital CT, Hertel exophthalmometry (HE) and standardized frontal and side facial photographs by a single trained photographer. compared to the digital photograph method in both groups studied. Although photographic digital exophthalmometry showed strong correlation and agreement with CT scan measurements, it still performs worse than and is not as shows the clinical, radiological, and digital exophthalmometry measurements of the normal and proptosis was observed between clinical and radiological measurements in both the proptosis group and the control group Digital exophthalmometry is a recent method to measure the axial globe position. Table 1: Clinical, radiological, and digital exophthalmometry means and standard deviations (SD) for each group (normal and proptosis). greater variance, lower correlation, and agreement to radiological measurements when compared to clinical	./cache/work_5vp4zqhcbbb5dms5epqqod7qmu.pdf	./txt/work_5vp4zqhcbbb5dms5epqqod7qmu.txt