id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
work_f7rrehowdndh7ns7o46vhho754	Alkim Almila Akdağ Salah	Technoscience art: A bridge between neuroesthetics and art history?	2008	9	.pdf	application/pdf	8873	602	56	decade, art history has been lagging behind the current research on vision, cognitive science and neuroscience. He argues that while viewing modern artworks, neurons that respond to visual primitives are consistently activated, naturally leading to pleasing sensations. In contrast to approaches focusing on the artistic abilities and creativity, the third approach investigates aesthetic enjoyment through brain-imaging experiments on subjects looking at pictures. Bogousslavsky, 2003; Otte, De Bondt, Wiele, Audenaert, & Dierckx, 2003; Ravin & Ravin, 1999; Sahlas, 2003; Stewart, 2002). planation of art as a by-product of a more general conceptformation and abstraction function of the brain (Zeki, 2004). particularly important to aesthetics and art history. Contemporary art production and criticism do not essentialize the aesthetic dimension for artworks; the visual aspects of the works are not on equal footing with their conceptual dimension anymore. century art history prefers to disregard the element of emotion in its theories of aesthetics. uses theories from both cognitive sciences and art history,	./cache/work_f7rrehowdndh7ns7o46vhho754.pdf	./txt/work_f7rrehowdndh7ns7o46vhho754.txt