Rode M5 Skip to main content Log in Register Subscribe Shop Help 0 items Search SOUND ON SOUND Home About Advertise Contact Information Readers' Ads Glossary Videos Tutorials Podcasts Search News Latest All News Podcasts Search Forum Latest posts FAQ Members Rules Search Glossary Magazine Latest issue Subscribe Advertise Publication Dates Write for SOS Search All issues Reviews Articles Podcasts Search Techniques Articles Series Tutorials Podcasts Search People Articles Podcasts Search Sound Advice Articles Tutorials Podcasts Search Music Business Articles Podcasts Search You are here Home Reviews Rode M5 Capacitor Microphone Pair Microphones / Miking By Paul White Published February 2014 Making quality stereo recordings has never been cheaper, thanks to the launch of Rode's new M5 mic set. Rode's small-diaphragm NT5 and NT55 models have proven to be very popular in both project and pro studios, though for the past few years the company have been enjoying large-scale success with their video camera microphones, broadcast microphones and some more consumer-style products. Now they have turned their attention back to the project-studio market, with the launch of the new model NT1 large-diaphragm capacitor and the small-diaphragm M5, reviewed here. With the aim of delivering similar quality to the NT5 but at an even lower price, Rode adopted back-electret technology to develop this new end-fire model. Designed and manufactured in Australia, the M5 has a half-inch capsule with a fixed cardioid pattern, and Rode promote its key attributes as being low noise and a wide frequency response. Such small-diaphragm microphones are often the best choice for recording acoustic instruments or ensembles and choirs. Since many of these applications require stereo pairs, Rode are presently only selling the M5s in matched-pair sets. They ensure that there's a variation of no more than 1dB sensitivity between any matched microphones. Rode Works Externally, the microphone employs Rode's proprietary matte-black ceramic coating, which is both durable and attractive. As supplied, the mics come with WS5 foam windshields and RM5 stand mounts, all packaged in a sturdy cardboard box with a form-fitting cardboard tray holding the mics and accessories. There's no plastic storage pouch. Internally, the circuitry employs a J-FET impedance converter feeding a transformerless, bipolar output stage, making good use of surface-mount components to keep things compact. The 20Hz to 20kHz response exhibits a subtle, wide presence hump of no more than a couple of dB centred at around 7kHz, but other than that, the response is sensibly flat until it hits the -3dB points at 20Hz and 20kHz. There are no pads or filter switches on the mic, though it can handle SPLs of up to 140dB (at 1kHz for one percent THD). It has a quoted sensitivity of -34dB ref 1V/P, and with its A-weighted noise figure of 19dB EIN, the background noise is not untypical for a good-quality microphone of this type, and will certainly not pose a problem in normal studio applications. The M5 isnicely compact, at 100mm long and 20mm in diameter, making it easy to position around awkward instruments. Also, not to be undervalued, the 12-month warranty period is extended to 10 years once you register the product with Rode. Driving The M5 My first test was to use a single M5 to record acoustic guitar, the results of which sounded detailed and articulate, with that gentle presence hump bringing out the transients while avoiding harshness or brittleness. At no time did the tonality give away the fact that I was using a budget microphone. Putting up my NT55 (fitted with a cardioid capsule) produced very similar results, though if anything, the NT55 exhibited a slightly more forward character in the highs than did the M5 so, for that particular instrument in that particular room, I actually preferred the sound of the M5, which came as something of a surprise! The two mics are surprisingly close in character though, with no obvious 'tells' to suggest that the M5 is the poor relation. One popular technique for testing a mic's high-frequency response is to record a set of jangling keys, as that sound contains a lot of HF (and even ultrasonic) energy. As an alternative to that, though, I recorded a set of miniature bells (also rich in high frequencies), which in my case was a little more scientific as several of my keys have plastic fobs! Neither the NT55 nor the M5 seemed unduly upset, however, and both gave a good impression of the bells as heard in the room with minimal intermodulation artifacts. As a stereo pair the mics are also very effective, and well matched in sensitivity. They are useful in both spaced and coincident configurations, the low end always sounding tight and controlled. The M5s were very easy to position, as the former are an inch or so shorter than the NT5 and significantly shorter than the NT55. Given their attractive price, the level of performance and that enticingly long warranty, there's little not to like about Rode's new mic. It is a capable general-purpose mic that can handle just about any acoustic instrument source (though it probably wouldn't be my first choice for kick drum), where their ability to sound smooth yet detailed will be appreciated.   Alternatives Most of the familiar names in microphone manufacturing offer small-diaphragm mics, many at a budget price, as with the MXL 606, though the M5's combination of performance, price and warranty surely puts it towards the top end of anyone's shortlist. Pros Surprisingly inexpensive. Nicely engineered. Detailed, clean sound. Long warranty. Available as matched pairs. Cons No plastic storage pouch or box included. Summary Whether used singly or in pairs, the M5 offers a serious level of performance at an entry-level price. information £169 per matched pair, including VAT.Source Distribution +44 (0)20 8962 5080 sales@sourcedistribution.co.uk www.sourcedistribution.co.uk www.rodemic.com $199 per pair.Rode USA +1 562 364 7400 usasupport@rodemic.com www.rodemic.com Test Spec Buy PDF version Published February 2014 Previous articleNext article In this article... Introduction Rode Works Driving The M5 Alternatives SOS Competitions Win! GIK Acoustics Impression Room Kit WIN award-winning Aston Microphones Element mic Readers' Ads View all ads Create free ad On the same subject Melodium 42Bn May 2021 Shure MV7 May 2021 Golden Gear: AKG D19 May 2021 Q. What mic polar pattern is best for recording speech? May 2021 Warm Audio WA‑87 R2 May 2021 From the same manufacturer Rode RodeCaster Pro v2 June 2020 Rode NTG5 March 2020 Rode TF-5 October 2019 Rode RodeCaster Pro April 2019 Session Notes: Magician's Nephew | Big Drum Sound January 2019 Sign Up TO SOS Newsletters Latest Videos Bad Musicians Need Good Engineers 1 month 1 week ago. Using Phaser Effects 6 days 32 min ago. 100 Years Of The Theremin | Podcast 1 month 1 week ago. New forum posts Re: Correct tool to avoid clipping during "hands o... > Wonks > Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:45 pm Recording: Gear & Techniques Re: DDA D Series Manual and Schematics > Hugh Robjohns > Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:39 pm Recording: Gear & Techniques Re: Korg Triton Taktile 49 - problems using with a PC > Wonks > Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:38 pm Keyboards & Synthesis Re: Musician Bios: How to Not Ruin Your Career? > Petros_K > Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:30 pm Music Business Re: DDA D Series Manual and Schematics > Sam Spoons > Tue Apr 27, 2021 5:28 pm Recording: Gear & Techniques Recent topics Speaker - Amp Match  Correct tool to avoid clipping during "hands off t...  Why doesn't my bounce sound like my active mix?  DDA D Series Manual and Schematics  Korg Triton Taktile 49 - problems using with a PC  Musician Bios: How to Not Ruin Your Career?  Loft conversion studio/office  Luthier recommendations Essex (ish) area...  Remote Control of UAD Console - AT Last!  Please Recomend good headphones for mixing.  Recently active forums Mixing, Mastering & Post Production Recording: Gear & Techniques Keyboards & Synthesis Music Business DIY Electronics & Studio Design Guitar Technology Feedback New Products & Industry News Windows Music Mac Music Music Theory, Songwriting & Composition Live Sound & Performance Apps & Other Computers/OS Remote Collaboration User Reviews SOS Support Forum Useful Information Archive You may login with either your assigned username or your e-mail address. The password field is case sensitive. Request new password Create an account Contact Us Cookie Policy Help Privacy Policy Terms of Use        All contents copyright © SOS Publications Group and/or its licensors, 1985-2021. All rights reserved. The contents of this article are subject to worldwide copyright protection and reproduction in whole or part, whether mechanical or electronic, is expressly forbidden without the prior written consent of the Publishers. Great care has been taken to ensure accuracy in the preparation of this article but neither Sound On Sound Limited nor the publishers can be held responsible for its contents. The views expressed are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the publishers. Web site designed & maintained by PB Associates & SOS