Classical Latin - Wikipedia





	
	

	
	

	Classical Latin

	
		From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

		

		

		
		

		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		Standard form of the Latin language in the Roman Republic and Empire

This article is about written Classical Latin. For spoken language, see Latin.




	Classical Latin
	LINGVA LATINA, lingua latīna
	Latin inscription in the Colosseum

	Pronunciation	[laˈtiːnɪtaːs]
	Native to	Roman Republic, Roman Empire
	Region	Mare Nostrum region
	Era	75 BC to AD 3rd century, when it developed into Late Latin
	Language family
	Indo-European
	
Italic	Latino-Faliscan	Latin	Classical Latin









	Early form
	Old Latin


	Writing system
	Classical Latin alphabet 
	Official status
	Official language in
	Roman Republic, Roman Empire
	Regulated by	Schools of grammar and rhetoric
	Language codes
	ISO 639-3	–
	Linguist List
	lat-cla
	Glottolog	None
	Linguasphere	51-AAB-aaa
	The range of Latin, AD 60



Classical Latin is the form of Latin language recognized as a standard by writers of the late Roman Republic and early Roman Empire. It was used from 75 BC-3rd century AD when it developed into Late Latin. In some later periods, it was regarded as good or proper Latin, with following versions viewed as debased, degenerate, vulgar, or corrupted. The word Latin is now understood by default to mean "Classical Latin"; for example, modern Latin textbooks almost exclusively teach Classical Latin.

Cicero and his contemporaries of the late republic used lingua latina and sermo latinus versions of the Latin language. Conversely, the Greeks used Vulgar Latin (sermo vulgaris and sermo vulgi) in their vernacular, written as latinitas,[note 1] or "Latinity" (which implies "good") when combined. It was also called sermo familiaris ("speech of the good families"), sermo urbanus ("speech of the city"), and in rare cases sermo nobilis ("noble speech"). Besides latinitas, it was mainly called latine (adverb for "in good Latin"), or latinius (comparative adverb for "in better Latin").

Latinitas was spoken and written. It was the language taught in schools. Prescriptive rules therefore applied to it, and when special subjects like poetry or rhetoric were taken into consideration, additional rules applied. Since spoken Latinitas has become extinct (in favor of subsequent registers), the rules of politus (polished) texts may give the appearance of an artificial language. However, Latinitas was a form of sermo (spoken language), and as such, retains spontaneity. No texts by Classical Latin authors are noted for the type of rigidity evidenced by stylized art, with the exception of repetitious abbreviations and stock phrases found on inscriptions. The best known example, "IESVS NAZARENVS REX IVDAEORVM" ("Jesus Nazarenus Rex Judaeorum", "Jesus The Nasarean - The King Of The Judeans") was the titulus written on the placard above Jesus' head on the Cross, is possibly the most famous example of Classical Latin.


Contents


	1 Philological constructs
	1.1 Classical
	1.2 Canonical
	1.3 Ages of Latin



	2 Authors of the Golden Age
	2.1 Republican
	2.2 Augustan



	3 Authors of the Silver Age
	3.1 From the Ides of March to Trajan
	3.2 Through the death of Marcus Aurelius, 180 AD



	4 Stylistic shifts
	5 See also
	6 Notes
	7 References
	7.1 Citations
	7.2 General sources



	8 Further reading
	9 External links





Philological constructs[edit]

Classical[edit]

"Good Latin" in philology is known as "classical" Latin literature. The term refers to the canonical relevance of literary works written in Latin in the late Roman Republic, and early to middle Roman Empire. "[T]hat is to say, that of belonging to an exclusive group of authors (or works) that were considered to be emblematic of a certain genre."[1] The term classicus (masculine plural classici) was devised by the Romans to translate Greek ἐγκριθέντες (encrithentes), and "select" which refers to authors who wrote in a form of Greek that was considered model. Before then, the term classis, in addition to being a naval fleet, was a social class in one of the diachronic divisions of Roman society in accordance with property ownership under the Roman constitution.[2] The word is a transliteration of Greek κλῆσις (clēsis, or "calling") used to rank army draftees by property from first to fifth class.

Classicus refers to those in the primae classis ("first class"), such as the authors of polished works of Latinitas, or sermo urbanus. It contains nuances of the certified and the authentic, or testis classicus ("reliable witness"). It was under this construct that Marcus Cornelius Fronto (an African-Roman lawyer and language teacher) used scriptores classici ("first-class" or "reliable authors") in the second century AD. Their works were be viewed as models of good Latin.[3] This is the first known reference (possibly innovated during this time) to Classical Latin applied by authors, evidenced in the authentic language of their works.[4]


Canonical[edit]

  
David Ruhnken



Imitating Greek grammarians, Romans such as Quintilian drew up lists termed indices or ordines modeled after the ones created by the Greeks, which were called pinakes. The Greek lists were considered classical, or recepti scriptores ("select writers"). Aulus Gellius includes authors like Plautus, who are considered writers of Old Latin and not strictly in the period of classical Latin. The classical Romans distinguished Old Latin as prisca Latinitas and not sermo vulgaris. Each author's work in the Roman lists was considered equivalent to one in the Greek. In example, Ennius was the Latin Homer, Aeneid was the equivalent of Iliad, etc. The lists of classical authors were as far as the Roman grammarians went in developing a philology. The topic remained at that point while interest in the classici scriptores declined in the medieval period as the best form of the language yielded to medieval Latin, inferior to classical standards.

The Renaissance saw a revival in Roman culture, and with it, the return of Classic ("the best") Latin. Thomas Sébillet's Art Poétique (1548), "les bons et classiques poètes françois", refers to Jean de Meun and Alain Chartier, who the first modern application of the words.[citation needed] According to Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, the term classical (from classicus) entered modern English in 1599, some 50 years after its re-introduction to the continent. In Governor William Bradford's Dialogue (1648), he referred to synods of a separatist church as "classical meetings", defined by meetings between "young men" from New England and "ancient men" from Holland and England.[5] In 1715, Laurence Echard's Classical Geographical Dictionary was published.[6] In 1736, Robert Ainsworth's Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Compendarius turned English words and expressions into "proper and classical Latin."[7] In 1768, David Ruhnken's Critical History of the Greek Orators recast the molded view of the classical by applying the word "canon" to the pinakes of orators after the Biblical canon, or list of authentic books of the Bible. In doing so, Ruhnken had secular catechism in mind.[8]


Ages of Latin[edit]

  
Wilhelm Sigismund Teuffel



In 1870, Wilhelm Sigismund Teuffel's Geschichte der Römischen Literatur (A History of Roman Literature) defined the philological notion of classical Latin based on the metaphoric uses of the ancient myth, Ages of Man. It was viewed as a universal standard, marking the Golden and Silver Ages of classical Latin. Shortly after Wilhem Wagner published Teuffel's work in German, he translated it to English (1873). Teuffel's classification divides the chronology of classical Latin authors into several periods according to political events rather than by style. His work (with modifications) is still in use today.

Teuffel went on to publish other editions, but the English translation of A History of Roman Literature gained immediate success.

In 1877, Charles Thomas Cruttwell produced a similar work in English. In his preface, Cruttwell notes, "Teuffel's admirable history, without which many chapters in the present work could not have attained completeness." He also credits Wagner.

Cruttwell adopts the time periods found in Teuffel's work, but he presents a detailed analysis of style, whereas Teuffel was more concerned with history. Like Teuffel, Cruttwell encountered issues while attempting to condense the voluminous details of time periods in an effort to capture the meaning of phases found in their various writing styles. Like Teuffel, he has trouble finding a name for the first of the three periods (the current Old Latin phase), calling it "from Livius to Sulla." He says the language "is marked by immaturity of art and language, by a vigorous but ill-disciplined imitation of Greek poetical models, and in prose by a dry sententiousness of style, gradually giving way to a clear and fluent strength..." These abstracts have little meaning to those not well-versed in Latin literature. In fact, Cruttwell admits "The ancients, indeed, saw a difference between Ennius, Pacuvius, and Accius, but it may be questioned whether the advance would be perceptible by us."

In time, some of Cruttwell's ideas become established in Latin philology. While praising the application of rules to classical Latin (most intensely in the Golden Age, he says "In gaining accuracy, however, classical Latin suffered a grievous loss. It became cultivated as distinct from a natural language... Spontaneity, therefore, became impossible and soon invention also ceased... In a certain sense, therefore, Latin was studied as a dead language, while it was still a living."[9]

Also problematic in Teuffel's scheme is its appropriateness to the concept of classical Latin. Cruttwell addresses the issue by altering the concept of the classical. The "best" Latin is defined as "golden" Latin, the second of the three periods. The other two periods (considered "classical") are left hanging. By assigning the term "pre-classical" to Old Latin and implicating it to post-classical (or post-Augustan) and silver Latin, Cruttwell realized that his construct was not accordance with ancient usage and assertions: "[T]he epithet classical is by many restricted to the authors who wrote in it [golden Latin]. It is best, however, not to narrow unnecessarily the sphere of classicity; to exclude Terence on the one hand or Tacitus and Pliny on the other, would savour of artificial restriction rather than that of a natural classification." The contradiction remains—Terence is, and is not a classical author, depending on context.[10]


Authors of the Golden Age[edit]

  
At Maecenas' Reception, oil, Stepan Bakalovich, 1890. An artist's view of the classical. Maecenas knew and entertained everyone literary in the Golden Age, especially Augustus.



Teuffel's definition of the "First Period" of Latin was based on inscriptions, fragments, and the literary works of the earliest known authors. Though he does use the term "Old Roman" at one point, most of these findings remain unnamed. Teuffel presents the Second Period in his major work, das goldene Zeitalter der römischen Literatur (Golden Age of Roman Literature), dated 671–767 AUC (83 BC – 14 AD), according to his own recollection. The timeframe is marked by the dictatorship of Lucius Cornelius Sulla Felix and the death of the emperor Augustus.[11][12] Wagner's translation of Teuffel's writing is as follows:


The golden age of the Roman literature is that period in which the climax was reached in the perfection of form, and in most respects also in the methodical treatment of the subject-matters. It may be subdivided between the generations, in the first of which (the Ciceronian Age) prose culminated, while poetry was principally developed in the Augustan Age.


The Ciceronian Age was dated 671–711 AUC (83–43 BC), ending just after the death of Marcus Tullius Cicero. The Augustan 711–67 AUC (43 BC – 14 AD) ends with the death of Augustus. The Ciceronian Age is further divided by the consulship of Cicero in 691 AUC (63 BC) into a first and second half. Authors are assigned to these periods by years of principal achievements.

The Golden Age had already made an appearance in German philology, but in a less-systematic way. In a translation of Bielfeld's Elements of universal erudition (1770):

The Second Age of Latin began about the time of Caesar [his ages are different from Teuffel's], and ended with Tiberius. This is what is called the Augustan Age, which was perhaps of all others the most brilliant, a period at which it should seem as if the greatest men, and the immortal authors, had met together upon the earth, in order to write the Latin language in its utmost purity and perfection...[13] and of Tacitus, his conceits and sententious style is not that of the golden age...[14]

Evidently, Teuffel received ideas about golden and silver Latin from an existing tradition and embedded them in a new system, transforming them as he thought best.

In Cruttwell's introduction, the Golden Age is dated 80 BC – 14 AD (from Cicero to Ovid), which corresponds to Teuffel's findings. Of the "Second Period," Cruttwell paraphrases Teuffel by saying it "represents the highest excellence in prose and poetry." The Ciceronian Age (known today as the "Republican Period") is dated 80–42 BC, marked by the Battle of Philippi. Cruttwell omits the first half of Teuffel's Ciceronian, and starts the Golden Age at Cicero's consulship in 63 BC—an error perpetuated in Cruttwell's second edition. He likely meant 80 BC, as he includes Varro in Golden Latin. Teuffel's Augustan Age is Cruttwell's Augustan Epoch (42 BC – 14 AD).


Republican[edit]

  
Marcus Tullius Cicero, after whom Teuffel named his Ciceronian period of the Golden Age



  
Julius Caesar



The literary histories list includes all authors from Canonical to the Ciceronian Age—even those whose works are fragmented or missing altogether. With the exception of a few major writers, such as Cicero, Caesar, Virgil and Catullus, ancient accounts of Republican literature praise jurists and orators whose writings, and analyses of various styles of language cannot be verified because there are no surviving records. The reputations of Aquilius Gallus, Quintus Hortensius Hortalus, Lucius Licinius Lucullus, and many others who gained notoriety without readable works, are presumed by their association within the Golden Age. A list of canonical authors of the period whose works survived in whole or in part is shown here:


	Marcus Terentius Varro (116–27 BC), highly influential grammarian
	Titus Pomponius Atticus (112/109 – 35/32), publisher and correspondent of Cicero
	Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 BC), orator, philosopher, essayist, whose works define golden Latin prose and are used in Latin curricula beyond the elementary level
	Servius Sulpicius Rufus (106–43 BC), jurist, poet
	Decimus Laberius (105–43 BC), writer of mimes
	Marcus Furius Bibaculus (1st century BC), writer of ludicra
	Gaius Julius Caesar (103–44 BC), general, statesman, historian
	Gaius Oppius (1st century BC), secretary to Julius Caesar, probable author under Caesar's name
	Gaius Matius (1st century BC), public figure, correspondent with Cicero
	Cornelius Nepos (100–24 BC), biographer
	Publilius Syrus (1st century BC), writer of mimes and maxims
	Quintus Cornificius (1st century BC), public figure and writer on rhetoric
	Titus Lucretius Carus (Lucretius; 94–50 BC), poet, philosopher
	Publius Nigidius Figulus (98–45 BC), public officer, grammarian
	Aulus Hirtius (90–43 BC), public officer, military historian
	Gaius Helvius Cinna (1st century BC), poet
	Marcus Caelius Rufus (87–48 BC), orator, correspondent with Cicero
	Gaius Sallustius Crispus (86–34 BC), historian
	Marcus Porcius Cato Uticensis (Cato the Younger; 95–46 BC), orator
	Publius Valerius Cato (1st century BC), poet, grammarian
	Gaius Valerius Catullus (Catullus; 84–54 BC), poet
	Gaius Licinius Macer Calvus (82–47 BC), orator, poet


Augustan[edit]

Main article: Augustan literature (ancient Rome)

The Golden Age is divided by the assassination of Julius Caesar. In the wars that followed, a generation of Republican literary figures were lost. Marcus Tullius Cicero was beheaded in the streets as he inquired among his litter about a disturbance.[citation needed] Cicero and his contemporaries were replaced by a new generation who spent their formidable years under the old constructs, and forced to make their mark under the watchful eye of a new emperor. The demand for great orators had ceased,[15] shifting to an emphasis on poetry. Other than the historian Livy, the most remarkable writers of the period were the poets Virgil, Horace, and Ovid. Although Augustus evidenced some toleration to republican sympathizers, he exiled Ovid, and imperial tolerance ended with the continuance of the Julio-Claudian dynasty.

Augustan writers include:


	Publius Vergilius Maro (Virgil, spelled also as Vergil; 70–19 BC),
	Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horace; 65–8 BC), known for lyric poetry and satires
	Sextus Aurelius Propertius (50–15 BC), poet
	Albius Tibullus (54–19 BC), elegiac poet
	Publius Ovidius Naso (Ovid; 43 BC – AD 18), poet
	Titus Livius (Livy; 64 BC – AD 12), historian
	Grattius Faliscus (a contemporary of Ovid), poet
	Marcus Manilius (1st century BC and AD), astrologer, poet
	Gaius Julius Hyginus (64 BC – AD 17), librarian, poet, mythographer
	Marcus Verrius Flaccus (55 BC – AD 20), grammarian, philologist, calendarist
	Marcus Vitruvius Pollio (80-70 BC — after 15 BC), engineer, architect
	Marcus Antistius Labeo (d. AD 10 or 11), jurist, philologist
	Lucius Cestius Pius (1st century BC & AD), Latin educator
	Gnaeus Pompeius Trogus (1st century BC), historian, naturalist
	Marcus Porcius Latro (1st century BC), rhetorician
	Gaius Valgius Rufus (consul 12 BC), poet


Authors of the Silver Age[edit]

  
The frowning second emperor, Tiberius, limited free speech, precipitating the rise of Silver Latin, with its emphasis on mannerism rather than on solid content, according to Teuffel's model



In his second volume, Imperial Period, Teuffel initiated a slight alteration in approach, making it clear that his terms applied to Latin and not just to the period. He also changed his dating scheme from AUC to modern BC/AD. Though he introduces das silberne Zeitalter der römischen Literatur, (The Silver Age of Roman Literature)[16] from the death of Augustus to the death of Trajan (14–117 AD), he also mentions parts of a work by Seneca the Elder, a wenig Einfluss der silbernen Latinität (a slight influence of silver Latin). It's clear that his mindset had shifted from Golden and Silver Ages to Golden and Silver Latin, also to include Latinitas, which at this point must be interpreted as Classical Latin. He may have been influenced in that regard by one of his sources E. Opitz, who in 1852 had published specimen lexilogiae argenteae latinitatis, which includes Silver Latinity.[17] Though Teuffel's First Period was equivalent to Old Latin and his Second Period was equal to the Golden Age, his Third Period die römische Kaiserheit encompasses both the Silver Age and the centuries now termed Late Latin, in which the forms seemed to break loose from their foundation and float freely. That is, men of literature were confounded about the meaning of "good Latin." The last iteration of Classical Latin is known as Silver Latin. The Silver Age is the first of the Imperial Period, and is divided into die Zeit der julischen Dynastie (14–68); die Zeit der flavischen Dynastie (69–96), and die Zeit des Nerva und Trajan (96–117). Subsequently, Teuffel goes over to a century scheme: 2nd, 3rd, etc., through 6th. His later editions (which came about towards the end of the 19th century) divide the Imperial Age into parts: 1st century (Silver Age), 2nd century ( the Hadrian and the Antonines), and the 3rd through 6th centuries. Of the Silver Age proper, Teuffel points out that anything like freedom of speech had vanished with Tiberius:[18]



...the continual apprehension in which men lived caused a restless versatility...  Simple or natural composition was considered insipid; the aim of language was to be brilliant...  Hence it was dressed up with abundant tinsel of epigrams, rhetorical figures and poetical terms...  Mannerism supplanted style, and bombastic pathos took the place of quiet power.


The content of new literary works was continually proscribed by the emperor, who exiled or executed existing authors and played the role of literary man, himself (typically badly). Artists therefore went into a repertory of new and dazzling mannerisms, which Teuffel calls "utter unreality." Cruttwell picks up this theme:[19]



The foremost of these [characteristics] is unreality, arising from the extinction of freedom...  Hence arose a declamatory tone, which strove by frigid and almost hysterical exaggeration to make up for the healthy stimulus afforded by daily contact with affairs. The vein of artificial rhetoric, antithesis and epigram... owes its origin to this forced contentment with an uncongenial sphere. With the decay of freedom, taste sank...


  
Marcus Aurelius, emperor over the last generation of classicists and himself a classicist.



In Cruttwell's view (which had not been expressed by Teuffel), Silver Latin was a "rank, weed-grown garden," a "decline."[20] Cruttwell had already decried what he saw as a loss of spontaneity in Golden Latin. Teuffel regarded the Silver Age as a loss of natural language, and therefore of spontaneity, implying that it was last seen in the Golden Age. Instead, Tiberius brought about a "sudden collapse of letters." The idea of a decline had been dominant in English society since Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Once again, Cruttwell evidences some unease with his stock pronouncements: "The Natural History of Pliny shows how much remained to be done in fields of great interest." The idea of Pliny as a model is not consistent with any sort of decline. Moreover, Pliny did his best work under emperors who were as tolerant as Augustus had been. To include some of the best writings of the Silver Age, Cruttwell extended the period through the death of Marcus Aurelius (180 AD). The philosophic prose of a good emperor was in no way compatible with either Teuffel's view of unnatural language, or Cruttwell's depiction of a decline. Having created these constructs, the two philologists found they could not entirely justify them. Apparently, in the worst implication of their views, there was no such thing as Classical Latin by the ancient definition, and some of the very best writing of any period in world history was deemed stilted, degenerate, unnatural language.

The Silver Age furnishes the only two extant Latin novels: Apuleius's The Golden Ass and Petronius's Satyricon.

Perhaps history's best-known example of Classical Latin was written by Pontius Pilate on the placard placed above Jesus' Cross: Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum, which translates to Jesus the Nazarean the King of the Judeans (Jesus of Nazareth the King of the Jews).

Writers of the Silver Age include:


From the Ides of March to Trajan[edit]

  
Germanicus Caesar



  
Ancient bust of Seneca, part of a double herm (Antikensammlung Berlin)



	Aulus Cremutius Cordus (died AD 25), historian
	Marcus Velleius Paterculus (19 BC – 31 AD), military officer, historian
	Valerius Maximus (1st century AD), rhetorician
	Masurius Sabinus (1st century AD), jurist
	Phaedrus (15 BC – AD 50), fabulist
	Germanicus Julius Caesar (15 BC – AD 19), royal family, imperial officer, translator
	Aulus Cornelius Celsus (25 BC – AD 50), physician, encyclopedist
	Quintus Curtius Rufus (1st century AD), historian
	Cornelius Bocchus (1st century AD), natural historian
	Pomponius Mela (d. AD 45), geographer
	Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4 BC – AD 65), educator, imperial advisor, philosopher, man of letters
	Titus Calpurnius Siculus (1st century AD or possibly later), poet
	Marcus Valerius Probus (1st century AD), literary critic
	Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus (10 BC – AD 54), emperor, man of letters, public officer
	Gaius Suetonius Paulinus (1st century AD), general, natural historian
	Lucius Junius Moderatus Columella (AD 4 – 70), military officer, agriculturalist
	Quintus Asconius Pedianus (9 BC – 76 AD), historian, Latinist
	Gaius Musonius Rufus (AD 20 – 101), stoic philosopher
	Quintus Marcius Barea Soranus (1st century AD), imperial officer and public man
	Gaius Plinius Secundus (AD 23 – 79), imperial officer and encyclopedist
	Gaius Valerius Flaccus (1st century AD), epic poet
	Tiberius Catius Silius Italicus (AD 28 – 103), epic poet
	Gaius Licinius Mucianus (d. AD 76), general, man of letters
	Lucilius Junior (1st century AD), poet
	Aulus Persius Flaccus (34–62 AD), poet and satirist
	Marcus Fabius Quintilianus (35–100 AD), rhetorician
	Sextus Julius Frontinus (AD 40 – 103), engineer, writer
	Marcus Annaeus Lucanus (AD 39 – 65), poet, historian
	Publius Juventius Celsus Titus Aufidius Hoenius Severianus (1st and early 2nd centuries AD), imperial officer, jurist
	Aemilius Asper (1st and 2nd centuries AD), grammarian, literary critic
	Marcus Valerius Martialis (AD 40 – 104), poet, epigrammatist
	Publius Papinius Statius (AD 45 – 96), poet
	Decimus Junius Juvenalis (1st and 2nd centuries AD), poet, satirist
	Publius Annaeus Florus (1st and 2nd centuries AD), poet, rhetorician and probable author of the epitome of Livy
	Velius Longus (1st and 2nd centuries AD), grammarian, literary critic
	Flavius Caper (1st and 2nd centuries AD), grammarian
	Publius or Gaius Cornelius Tacitus (AD 56 − 120), imperial officer, historian and in Teuffel's view "the last classic of Roman literature."
	Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus (AD 62 – 114), historian, imperial officer and correspondent


Through the death of Marcus Aurelius, 180 AD[edit]

  
Sketch of Apuleius



Of the additional century granted by Cruttwell to Silver Latin, Teuffel says: "The second century was a happy period for the Roman State, the happiest indeed during the whole Empire... But in the world of letters the lassitude and enervation, which told of Rome's decline, became unmistakeable... its forte is in imitation."[21] Teuffel, however, excepts the jurists; others find other "exceptions", recasting Teuffels's view.[clarification needed]


	Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus (70/75 – after 130 AD), biographer
	Marcus Junianus Justinus (2nd century AD), historian
	Lucius Octavius Cornelius Publius Salvius Julianus Aemilianus (AD 110–170), imperial officer, jurist
	Sextus Pomponius (2nd century AD), jurist
	Quintus Terentius Scaurus (2nd century AD), grammarian, literary critic
	Aulus Gellius (AD 125 – after 180), grammarian, polymath
	Lucius Apuleius Platonicus (123/125–180 AD), novelist
	Marcus Cornelius Fronto (AD 100–170), advocate, grammarian
	Gaius Sulpicius Apollinaris (2nd century AD), educator, literary commentator
	Granius Licinianus (2nd century AD), writer
	Lucius Ampelius (2nd century AD), educator
	Gaius (AD 130–180), jurist
	Lucius Volusius Maecianus (2nd century AD), educator, jurist
	Marcus Minucius Felix (d. AD 250), apologist of Christianity, "the first Christian work in Latin" (Teuffel)
	Sextus Julius Africanus (2nd century AD), Christian historian
	Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus (121–180 AD, stoic philosopher, Emperor in Latin, essayist in ancient Greek, role model of the last generation of classicists (Cruttwell)


Stylistic shifts[edit]

Style of language refers to repeatable features of speech that are somewhat less general than the fundamental characteristics of a language. The latter provides unity, allowing it to be referred to by a single name. Thus Old Latin, Classical Latin, Vulgar Latin, etc., are not considered different languages, but are all referred to by the term, Latin. This is an ancient practice continued by moderns rather than a philological innovation of recent times. That Latin had case endings is a fundamental feature of the language. Whether a given form of speech prefers to use prepositions such as ad, ex, de, for "to," "from" and "of" rather than simple case endings is a matter of style. Latin has a large number of styles. Each and every author has a style, which typically allows his prose or poetry to be identified by experienced Latinists. Problems in comparative literature have risen out of group styles finding similarity by period, in which case one may speak of Old Latin, Silver Latin, Late Latin as styles or a phase of styles.

The ancient authors themselves first defined style by recognizing different kinds of sermo, or "speech". By valuing Classical Latin as "first class", it was better to write with Latinitas selected by authors who were attuned to literary and upper-class languages of the city as a standardized style. All sermo that differed from it was a different style. Thus, in rhetoric, Cicero was able to define sublime, intermediate, and low styles within Classical Latin. St. Augustine recommend low style for sermons.[22] Style was to be defined by deviation in speech from a standard. Teuffel termed this standard "Golden Latin".

John Edwin Sandys, who was an authority in Latin style for several decades, summarizes the differences between Golden and Silver Latin as follows:[23]

Silver Latin is to be distinguished by:


	"an exaggerated conciseness and point"
	"occasional archaic words and phrases derived from poetry"
	"increase in the number of Greek words in ordinary use" (the Emperor Claudius in Suetonius refers to "both our languages," Latin and Greek[24])
	"literary reminiscences"
	"The literary use of words from the common dialect" (dictare and dictitare as well as classical dicere, "to say")


See also[edit]


	Languages portal



	Classic
	Classical antiquity
	Classics
	Late Latin
	Latin
	Latin literature
	Medieval Latin
	New Latin
	Social class in ancient Rome


Notes[edit]


	^ When rarely used in English, the term is capitalized: Latinitas. In Latin it was written all in uppercase: LATINITAS, as were all words in Latin.





References[edit]

Citations[edit]


	^ Citroni 2006, p. 204.

	^ Citroni 2006, p. 205.

	^ Citroni 2006, p. 206, reported in Aulus Gellius, 9.8.15.

	^ Citroni 2006, p. 207.

	^ Bradford, William (1855) [1648]. "Gov. Bradford's Dialogue".  In Morton, Nathaniel (ed.). New England's Memorial. Boston: Congregational Board of Publication. p. 330.

	^ Littlefield 1904, p. 301.

	^ Ainsworth, Robert (January 1736). "Article XXX: Thesaurus Linguae Latinae Compendarius". The Present State of the Republic of Letters. London: W. Innys and R. Manby. XVII.


	^ Gorak, Jan (1991). The making of the modern canon: genesis and crisis of a literary idea. London: Athlone. p. 51.


	^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 3.

	^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 142.

	^ Teuffel 1873, p. 216.

	^ Teuffel 1873, p. 226.

	^ Bielfeld 1770, p. 244.

	^ Bielfeld 1770, p. 345.

	^ Teuffel 1873, p. 385, "Public life became extinct, all political business passed into the hands of the monarch..."

	^ Teuffel 1873, p. 526.

	^ Teuffel 1873, p. 530.

	^ Teuffel & Schwabe 1892, pp. 4–5.

	^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 6.

	^ Cruttwell 1877, p. 341.

	^ Teuffel & Schwabe 1892, p. 192.

	^ Auerbach, Erich; Mannheim, Ralph (Translator) (1965) [1958]. Literary Language and its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Bollingen Series LXXIV. Pantheon Books. p. 33.


	^ Sandys, John Edwin (1921). A Companion to Latin Studies Edited for the Syndics of the University Press (3rd ed.). Cambridge: University Press. pp. 824–26.


	^ Suetonius, Claudius, 24.1.





General sources[edit]


	Bielfeld, Baron (1770), The Elements of Universal Erudition, Containing an Analytical Abridgement of the Science, Polite Arts and Belles Lettres, III, translated by Hooper, W., London: G Scott

	Citroni, Mario (2006), "The Concept of the Classical and the Canons of Model Authors in Roman Literature",  in Porter, James I. (ed.), The Classical Tradition of Greece and Rome, translated by Packham, RA, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 204–34

	Cruttwell, Charles Thomas (1877), A History of Roman Literature from the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius, London: Charles Griffin & Co.

	Littlefield, George Emery (1904), Early Schools and School-books of New England, Boston, MA: Club of Odd Volumes

	Settis, Salvatore (2006), The Future of the "Classical", translated by Cameron, Allan, Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press

	Teuffel, Wilhelm Sigismund (1873), A History of Roman Literature, translated by Wagner, Wilhelm, London: George Bell & Sons

	Teuffel, Wilhelm Sigismund; Schwabe, Ludwig (1892), Teuffel's History of Roman Literature Revised and Enlarged, II, The Imperial Period, translated by Warr, George C.W. (from the 5th German ed.), London: George Bell & Sons





Further reading[edit]

	Library resources about 
 Classical Latin 

	
	Online books
	Resources in your library
	Resources in other libraries




	Allen, William Sidney. 1978. Vox Latina: A Guide to the Pronunciation of Classical Latin. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
	Cruttwell, Charles Thomas (2005) [1877]. A History of Roman Literature from the Earliest Period to the Death of Marcus Aurelius. London: Charles Griffin and Company, Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 26 September 2009.

	Dickey, Eleanor. 2012. "How to Say 'Please' in Classical Latin". The Classical Quarterly 62, no. 2: 731–48. doi:10.1017/S0009838812000286.
	Getty, Robert J. 1963. "Classical Latin meter and prosody, 1935–1962". Lustrum 8: 104–60.
	Levene, David. 1997. "God and man in the Classical Latin panegyric". Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43: 66–103.
	Lovric, Michelle, and Nikiforos Doxiadis Mardas. 1998. How to Insult, Abuse & Insinuate In Classical Latin. London: Ebury Press.
	Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine Loqui: Trends and Directions In the Crystallization of Classical Latin. München: W. Fink.
	Spevak, Olga. 2010. Constituent Order In Classical Latin Prose. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
	Teuffel, W. S. (2001) [1870]. Geschichte der Römischen Literatur (in German). Leipzig: B.G. Teubner. Retrieved 25 September 2009.



External links[edit]

	The Latin Library—Public domain Latin texts
	Latin Texts at the Perseus Collection
	Greek and Roman Authors on LacusCurtius
	Classical Latin Texts at the Packard Humanities Institute
	Latin Texts at Attalus
	A collection of Latin and Greek texts at the Schola Latina


		v
	t
	e


Ages of Latin

		
until 75 BC
Old Latin



	
75 BC – 200 AD
Classical Latin



	
200–900
Late Latin



	
900–1300
Medieval Latin



	
1300–1500
Renaissance Latin



	
1500–1900
New Latin



	
1900–present
Contemporary Latin







	
	History of Latin
	Latin literature
	Vulgar Latin
	Ecclesiastical Latin
	Romance languages
	Latino sine flexione
	Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum
	Hiberno-Latin
	Judeo-Latin







	
	v
	t
	e


Ancient Rome topics

	
	Outline
	Timeline




	History	
	
	Foundation
	Kingdom
	overthrow


	Republic




	Empire	
	History
	Pax Romana
	Principate
	Dominate
	Western Empire
	fall
	historiography of the fall


	Byzantine Empire
	decline
	fall









	Constitution	
	History
	Kingdom
	Republic
	Empire
	Late Empire
	Senate
	Legislative assemblies
	Curiate
	Centuriate
	Tribal
	Plebeian


	Executive magistrates
	SPQR




	Law	
	Twelve Tables
	Mos maiorum
	Citizenship
	Auctoritas
	Imperium
	Status
	Litigation




	Government	
	Curia
	Forum
	Cursus honorum
	Collegiality
	Emperor
	Legatus
	Dux
	Officium
	Prefect
	Vicarius
	Vigintisexviri
	Lictor
	Magister militum
	Imperator
	Princeps senatus
	Pontifex Maximus
	Augustus
	Caesar
	Tetrarch
	Optimates
	Populares
	Province




	Magistrates	
	Ordinary	
	Consul
	Censor
	Praetor
	Tribune
	Tribune of the Plebs
	Military tribune
	Quaestor
	Aedile
	Promagistrate
	Governor




	Extraordinary	
	Rex
	Interrex
	Dictator
	Magister Equitum
	Decemviri
	Consular Tribune
	Triumvir







	Military	
	History
	Borders
	Establishment
	Structure
	Campaigns
	Political control
	Strategy
	Engineering
	Frontiers and fortifications
	castra


	Technology
	Army
	Legion
	Infantry tactics
	Personal equipment
	Siege engines


	Navy
	Auxiliaries
	Decorations and punishments
	Hippika gymnasia




	Economy	
	Agriculture
	Deforestation
	Commerce
	Finance
	Currency
	Republican currency
	Imperial currency




	Culture	
	Architecture
	Art
	Bathing
	Calendar
	Clothing
	Cosmetics
	Cuisine
	Hairstyles
	Education
	Literature
	Music
	Mythology
	Religion
	Deities


	Romanization
	Roman people
	Sexuality
	Theatre
	Wine




	Society	
	Patricians
	Plebs
	Conflict of the Orders
	Secessio plebis
	Equites
	Gens
	Tribes
	Assembly


	Naming conventions
	Demography
	Women
	Marriage
	Adoption
	Slavery
	Bagaudae




	Technology	
	Amphitheatres
	Aqueducts
	Bridges
	Circuses
	Civil engineering
	Concrete
	Domes
	Metallurgy
	Numerals
	Roads
	Temples
	Theatres
	Sanitation
	Thermae




	Latin	
	History
	Alphabet
	Versions
	Old
	Classical
	Vulgar
	Late
	Medieval
	Renaissance
	New
	Contemporary
	Ecclesiastical


	Romance languages




	Writers	
	Latin	
	Aelius Donatus
	Ammianus Marcellinus
	Appuleius
	Asconius Pedianus
	Augustine
	Aurelius Victor
	Ausonius
	Boëthius
	Caesar
	Catullus
	Cassiodorus
	Censorinus
	Cicero
	Claudian
	Columella
	Cornelius Nepos
	Ennius
	Eutropius
	Fabius Pictor
	Sextus Pompeius Festus
	Rufus Festus
	Florus
	Frontinus
	Fronto
	Fulgentius
	Gellius
	Horace
	Hydatius
	Hyginus
	Jerome
	Jordanes
	Julius Paulus
	Justin
	Juvenal
	Lactantius
	Livy
	Lucan
	Lucretius
	Macrobius
	Marcellus Empiricus
	Marcus Aurelius
	Manilius
	Martial
	Nicolaus Damascenus
	Nonius Marcellus
	Obsequens
	Orosius
	Ovid
	Petronius
	Phaedrus
	Plautus
	Pliny the Elder
	Pliny the Younger
	Pomponius Mela
	Priscian
	Propertius
	Quadrigarius
	Quintilian
	Quintus Curtius Rufus
	Sallust
	Seneca the Elder
	Seneca the Younger
	Servius
	Sidonius Apollinaris
	Silius Italicus
	Statius
	Suetonius
	Symmachus
	Tacitus
	Terence
	Tertullian
	Tibullus
	Valerius Antias
	Valerius Maximus
	Varro
	Velleius Paterculus
	Verrius Flaccus
	Vergil
	Vitruvius




	Greek	
	Aelian
	Aëtius of Amida
	Appian
	Arrian
	Cassius Dio
	Diodorus Siculus
	Diogenes Laërtius
	Dionysius of Halicarnassus
	Dioscorides
	Eusebius of Caesaria
	Galen
	Herodian
	Josephus
	Julian
	Libanius
	Lucian
	Pausanias
	Philostratus
	Phlegon of Tralles
	Photius
	Plutarch
	Polyaenus
	Polybius
	Porphyrius
	Priscus
	Procopius
	Simplicius of Cilicia
	Sozomen
	Stephanus Byzantinus
	Strabo
	Themistius
	Theodoret
	Zonaras
	Zosimus







	Major cities	
	Alexandria
	Antioch
	Aquileia
	Berytus
	Bononia
	Carthage
	Constantinopolis
	Eboracum
	Leptis Magna
	Londinium
	Lugdunum
	Lutetia
	Mediolanum
	Pompeii
	Ravenna
	Roma
	Smyrna
	Vindobona
	Volubilis




	Lists and other
topics	
	Cities and towns
	Climate
	Consuls
	Dictators
	Distinguished women
	Dynasties
	Emperors
	Generals
	Gentes
	Geographers
	Institutions
	Laws
	Legacy
	Legions
	Magistri equitum
	Nomina
	Pontifices Maximi
	Praetors
	Quaestors
	Tribunes
	Roman–Iranian relations
	Wars and battles
	Civil wars and revolts




	Fiction
	Films














Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Classical_Latin&oldid=996319355"


		Categories: 	Classical Latin literature
	1st-century BC establishments in the Roman Republic
	3rd-century disestablishments
	Classical languages
	Forms of Latin
	Languages attested from the 1st century BC
	Languages extinct in the 3rd century
	Latin language in ancient Rome


Hidden categories: 	Articles with short description
	Short description is different from Wikidata
	Use dmy dates from November 2015
	Articles containing Latin-language text
	Languages without Glottolog code
	Historical forms of languages with ISO codes
	Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Linguist List code
	Languages without ISO 639-3 code but with Linguasphere code
	Language articles with unreferenced extinction date
	All articles with unsourced statements
	Articles with unsourced statements from December 2010
	Articles with unsourced statements from July 2013
	Wikipedia articles needing clarification from March 2014
	CS1: long volume value
	CS1 German-language sources (de)




	




	





	Navigation menu

	
		

	
		Personal tools
	

	
			Not logged in
	Talk
	Contributions
	Create account
	Log in


		
	



		
			

	
		Namespaces
	

	
			Article
	Talk


		
	



			

	
	
		Variants
	

	
		

		
	



		

		
			

	
		Views
	

	
			Read
	Edit
	View history


		
	



			

	
	
		More
	

	
		

		
	



			
	
		Search
	

	
		
			
			
			
			
		

	




		

	

	

	
		
	

	

	
		Navigation
	

	
			Main page
	Contents
	Current events
	Random article
	About Wikipedia
	Contact us
	Donate


		
	



	

	
		Contribute
	

	
			Help
	Learn to edit
	Community portal
	Recent changes
	Upload file


		
	




	
		Tools
	

	
			What links here
	Related changes
	Upload file
	Special pages
	Permanent link
	Page information
	Cite this page
	Wikidata item


		
	




	
		Print/export
	

	
			Download as PDF
	Printable version


		
	



	

	
		Languages
	

	
			العربية
	تۆرکجه
	Boarisch
	Català
	Deutsch
	Español
	Esperanto
	Euskara
	فارسی
	Français
	한국어
	Bahasa Indonesia
	Қазақша
	لۊری شومالی
	Lumbaart
	Македонски
	Nederlands
	日本語
	Norsk bokmål
	Occitan
	پنجابی
	Papiamentu
	Português
	Русский
	Simple English
	Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
	Українська
	اردو
	中文


		Edit links

	









		 This page was last edited on 25 December 2020, at 21:41 (UTC).
	Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply.  By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



		Privacy policy
	About Wikipedia
	Disclaimers
	Contact Wikipedia
	Mobile view
	Developers
	Statistics
	Cookie statement