id	author	title	date	pages	extension	mime	words	sentences	flesch	summary	cache	txt
cord-296028-hqrd1e8p	Rozell, Daniel J.	Assessing and Managing the Risks of Potential Pandemic Pathogen Research	2015-07-21		.txt	text/plain	2584	133	45	Ultimately, the purpose of summarizing and critiquing some of the arguments within the GOF/PPP debate is to emphasize the many epistemic and ethical value judgments inherent to RBA and to provide evidence for prior claims that a consensus-building quantitative assessment is unlikely (1). As summarized here, many of the disagreements within the GOF/PPP debate involve epistemic and ethical value judgments that suggest that definitive quantitative risk-benefit analysis is not possible. Risks and benefits of gain-of-function experiments with pathogens of pandemic potential, such as influenza virus: a call for a science-based discussion mBio addresses the pause in gain-offunction (GOF) experiments involving pathogens with pandemic potential (PPP) Conducting risk and benefit analysis on gain-of-function research involving pathogens with pandemic potential An epistemological perspective on the value of gain-of-function experiments involving pathogens with pandemic potential Vagueness and costs of the pause on gain-of-function (GOF) experiments on pathogens with pandemic potential, including influenza virus	./cache/cord-296028-hqrd1e8p.txt	./txt/cord-296028-hqrd1e8p.txt